Greg Inglis ruling gives Bennett's Bunnies $1m cap relief

@Harvey said in [Greg Inglis ruling gives Bennett's Bunnies $1m cap relief](/post/1014711) said:
Greg has been admitted to rehab. He obviously can’t fulfil the obligations in the role that Souths are paying him for.

Assume any payments being made will now be included in the cap. He is a contracted player who is unfit to play


I agree, but don’t hold your breath
 
I wonder what was in the loaded gun to get all the CEO’s to agree to the NRL deal with Souths on the Inglis thing. I guess it now sets a precedent for all clubs.
Just seems funny that clubs like Manly would agree after getting knocked back for a similar request and as far as I recall we had to carry Liam Fulton’s contract for a while.
Maybe with big question marks over Sydney franchises, clubs are two scared to rock the boat
 
@supercoach said in [Greg Inglis ruling gives Bennett's Bunnies $1m cap relief](/post/1014721) said:
I wonder what was in the loaded gun to get all the CEO’s to agree to the NRL deal with Souths on the Inglis thing. I guess it now sets a precedent for all clubs.
Just seems funny that clubs like Manly would agree after getting knocked back for a similar request and as far as I recall we had to carry Liam Fulton’s contract for a while.
Maybe with big question marks over Sydney franchises, clubs are two scared to rock the boat

Good post supercoach. The issue is consistency and when Watmough and Inglis received this treatment compared to Fulton, it is easy to come to the conclusion that our club doesn't have the profile necessary to warrant favourable decisions. I await the landslide of clubs wanting similar treatment.,
 
Back
Top