HBG Directors give themselves Pay rise

It’s been dubbed ‘the most chaotic board in NSW’. But Wests Tigers’ owners are pushing for a pay rise

By Chris Barrett

March 7, 2026 — 4.21pm
Wests Tigers’ owners are bidding to give themselves a pay rise three months after a shambolic episode in which they sacked chairman Barry O’Farrell and three other directors before backflipping at the behest of the NRL.

The Holman Barnes Group, which owns 90 per cent of the Tigers and holds the licence for the NRL team, has for the past year been embroiled in turmoil that has threatened to spill over into the football club.

Now, its board members are seeking a boost which would see them collect more than their counterparts at most other Sydney clubs with ties to NRL teams.

HBG is proposing that its chairman’s annual honorarium be lifted from $51,341 to $65,000, the deputy chair’s fee to be raised from $33,371 to $50,000, and all other directors to get $32,500 instead of $25,670. All would also receive an extra $5000 if they sit on a club committee.

The effective $70,000 payment per annum for the chairman would eclipse the amounts paid to those in charge at most of Sydney’s major NRL-affiliated leagues clubs, including those with much larger membership bases.

Parramatta Leagues Club, which owns the Eels and has 65,000 members, gives its president $30,000 a year and other directors $20,000.

The 60,000-member Canterbury League Club, which is strongly linked to the Bulldogs and backs them financially, allows for a total of $229,801 to be paid to its seven directors including the chairman – an average of $32,828, although the chair and deputy chair receive a greater share.

St George Leagues Club, which owns 50 per cent of the Dragons and has 25,000 members, hands its chair $16,000 a year and ordinary directors $12,000, plus $2000 for each committee they sit on.

HBG has 27,000 members and the proposed honoraria for its board are exceeded only by those at Penrith NRL team owners Panthers Group, where total revenue was nearly $180 million in 2025 and which has a membership base of 148,000. The Panthers’ chairman receives $80,000 a year, its two deputies get $40,000 each and the remaining directors pick up $20,000 per annum.

Like those at other clubs, the HBG board members can take advantage of other perks of the position such as food and drinks. At the club’s annual general meeting on March 21 members will also be asked to approve its chairman and deputy receiving $500 per month hospitality cards.

As Holman Barnes Group’s business has expanded, the workload and governance responsibilities placed on directors have increased substantially,” said HBG vice-chairman Frank Primerano, who also sits on the Wests Tigers board.

“The proposed adjustments simply bring board honorariums into line with the scale of the organisation and the time commitment required, particularly as directors are increasingly involved in committees and strategic projects during this period of significant growth and investment.”

A source familiar with the activities of HBG, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said: “How can the most chaotic board in NSW simultaneously become one of the highest paid?

“If the stipend for the board were based on performance then quite obviously these people would be getting a pay cut, not a pay day.”

HBG, which oversees venues including Wests Ashfield, returned a net profit of $11.9 million in 2025 after raking in $52 million from poker machines and recording overall revenue of $100 million, according to its annual report.

But the organisation has been plagued by dysfunction during the past 18 months, with several board members controversially removed and former NSW premier O’Farrell and three other independent directors then sensationally axed from the Tigers last December less than a year after they were installed following a governance review.

After concerns were raised by the NRL, HBG reinstated them days later and O’Farrell was Tigers chairman. But the club was forced into a costly payout to Tigers chief executive Shane Richardson, who resigned amid the boardroom chaos 18 months into a four-year contract, and settled out of court with former HBG director Rick Wayde, a key instigator of the Tigers review, after he was banned for eight years.

HBG, which owns the NRL team via its control of Wests Magpies, has since beefed up its representation on the Tigers board, giving it an effective majority.

While the Tigers are governed separately to their owners, NRL funding for the team flows through HBG.

According to its latest financial report, HBG received $20 million from the NRL in 2025 and owes $36 million to players and head coach Benji Marshall over the next five years.

HBG is unusual in that the balance of power lies with 20 so-called debenture holders, who choose the majority of its directors under a decades-old, undemocratic system.

Only two of nine board seats are directly elected by the wider membership and there will not be a ballot for those spots at this month’s AGM after one of the three nominations withdrew.

The two remaining are well known to HBG board members: Shannon Cavanagh, a director of Wests Magpies alongside HBG chairman Dennis Burgess and Primerano, and Aldo Di Mento, a director of APIA Leichardt FC – the inner-west soccer team in which HGB bought a stake last year and on whose board Primerano and HBG chief executive Daniel Paton also sit.
 
I'm sure they don't think so.

Remember that they were being the target of a rally directed at them at the time. Rolling over & saying "you got me" sounds more like incompetence. This sounds more like someone trying to put their perspective on things.
How about instead of taking pot shots on social media they hold a press conference, state why they made the changes they made, why they reappointed directors they removed and what their plans are for the future of the Wests Tigers.

You know show leadership and act like a professional organisation instead of a fan on the hill.

If you are going to appoint yourself leaders of our club then you sure as hell better act like it.
 
Find me a business board that doesn't increase wages each year after an addition to their portfolio.

This reads exactly like that, along with performance based increases.

Show me where HBG didn't perform at their board level.
They sacked the independent directors of the football club then reinstated them after the nrl boss met with them? They pushed out the ceo of the football club who turned a profit? Two straight forward examples.
 
From a Wests Tigers point of view, one can only hope in the near future another inevitable shit decision they make will push them on to walking the plank and we will finally be rid of them.
I’d say they’re one boardroom scandal away from license removal. PVL will be letting them dig their own grave. The game has never been in a better position and he’s not gonna let some debenture embarrassments drag the game down.
 
Apparently we had the best membership numbers & ran a profit, along with a better result on the field.

It doesn't look like we went backwards.

This year hasn't happened yet. If we go forward again- what happens?

The HBG pay rise is based on 2025 results, across all their spectrums, I would assume.
You cannot use this as a case in point because they sacked the people responsible for the success...

That my friend is gross incompetence.
 
The reason was richo..

But ok mate, you are making this argument so I will hear you out..

Come back in here with details of the arms of their business and the growth on each of them..

Lets see how much is actually a result of hard work and initiatives vs dependence on degenerate gamblers.

Don't side step this one.. present the actual details of the results and I will hear you out.
Do I have access to their profit & loss statements for each part of their business?

No. And you know that.

This is a forum, and a discussion. This is a point of view- and like it or not, it can be different from yours.

They had a successful year (in some regard) at Wests Tigers- you attribute that all to Richo. You can't back that up. Where did the Wests Tigers board & Benji come into it? How much was Richo, how much was the board? How much was from the financial assistance of HBG? How do you begin to quantify that argument?

This was thrown out a few times on the other thread as some kind of 'victory point'- asking for details that are not obvious, in a thread based on opinion- while any opposing view was shut down based on assumptions.

Just agree- this is about perception- and a conversation can be had.

I BELIEVE HBG aligned products had a successful year. They added that APIA soccer side to their portfolio too. If they performed HBG set tasks well, and added additional tasks to their role- why are we debating a pay rise at their level?
 
Find me a business board that doesn't increase wages each year after an addition to their portfolio.

This reads exactly like that, along with performance based increases.

Show me where HBG didn't perform at their board level.

I won't argue with you there but would you prefer that they would give more money to the football club or themsleves?
 
You cannot use this as a case in point because they sacked the people responsible for the success...

That my friend is gross incompetence.
People get let go from companies EVERYWHERE & boards/managers still get pay increases based on performance of the company.
 
I won't argue with you there but would you prefer that they would give more money to the football club or themsleves?
It would be great if they invest more in their portfolio. I assume not ALL their profits are going to bard member increases.
 
Did you read the article? it showed examples of comparable boards, with lower payments not increasing their payments.
It did.

What difference does HBG wage increases at board level make to anything Wests Tigers though?

There are companies that pay themselves more than others. That's totally up to them. It shouldn't have a modicum of impact on Wests Tigers.
 
Do I have access to their profit & loss statements for each part of their business?

No. And you know that.

This is a forum, and a discussion. This is a point of view- and like it or not, it can be different from yours.

They had a successful year (in some regard) at Wests Tigers- you attribute that all to Richo. You can't back that up. Where did the Wests Tigers board & Benji come into it? How much was Richo, how much was the board? How much was from the financial assistance of HBG? How do you begin to quantify that argument?

This was thrown out a few times on the other thread as some kind of 'victory point'- asking for details that are not obvious, in a thread based on opinion- while any opposing view was shut down based on assumptions.

Just agree- this is about perception- and a conversation can be had.

I BELIEVE HBG aligned products had a successful year. They added that APIA soccer side to their portfolio too. If they performed HBG set tasks well, and added additional tasks to their role- why are we debating a pay rise at their level?
Here ya go...

Profitability & Debt Elimination: Richardson revealed in late 2025 that the club had moved from a $5.5 million loss over the previous two fiscal years to a reported profit. He successfully cleared the club's existing debts, leaving "money in the bank" for future investment.

Commercial Growth: Under his leadership, key revenue streams saw unprecedented year-on-year growth:
Sponsorship: Increased by approximately 30–40%, including securing blue-chip partners like Pepper Money.

Membership: Surged by 27–40%, a significant feat following years of poor on-field performance.

Corporate Hospitality: Witnessed a 51% increase as the club professionalized its game-day offerings.

Stadium Strategy & Infrastructure: He secured a landmark 15-year stadium strategy. This included obtaining $110 million in government funding for the redevelopment of Leichhardt Oval and Campbelltown Sports Stadium, ensuring the club remained in its traditional "heartlands" while gaining access to modern facilities.
On-Field Improvement: While not reaching the finals, the team jumped from 17th to 13th in 2025, winning 9 games. This relative success stabilized the "product" on the field, leading to a 45% increase in crowd attendance.

Key Responsibilities
Shane Richardson was brought in specifically as a "fixer" to implement the findings of the independent Crawford-Barnier review. His primary responsibilities included:

- Governance Overhaul: Dissolving the old board structure and implementing a new, independent board of directors to remove factionalism and political infighting.

- Strategic Planning: Authoring and locking in a Club Strategic Plan through 2028, covering all departments from football operations to commercial sales.

- Roster & Salary Cap Management: Overseeing a "clean out" of the roster. He was responsible for the strategic recruitment of marquee players like Jarome Luai and managing the delicate balance between high-profile signings and promoting local talent from the Western Sydney nursery.

- Pathways & Community: Expanding the Empower program, which embedded the club into 60 local schools. He prioritized the "long game" by ensuring local juniors saw a clear path to the NRL, reducing the likelihood of losing stars to rival clubs.

- Coaching Support: Acting as a mentor and shield for rookie head coach Benji Marshall, allowing Marshall to focus on football while Richardson handled the media and corporate pressures.

----

So now please tell us about the initiatives and growth HBG are responsible for...
 
How about instead of taking pot shots on social media they hold a press conference, state why they made the changes they made, why they reappointed directors they removed and what their plans are for the future of the Wests Tigers.

You know show leadership and act like a professional organisation instead of a fan on the hill.

If you are going to appoint yourself leaders of our club then you sure as hell better act like it.
That's fair. HBG should address the issue. I assume they will once the new Wests Tigers board is in place.
 
They sacked the independent directors of the football club then reinstated them after the nrl boss met with them? They pushed out the ceo of the football club who turned a profit? Two straight forward examples.
That's Wests Tigers board, one of several things HBG are affiliated with. While they did remove the board members, and reinstated them later (reasons unclear), the CEO resigned- officially. (Yes, it looks designed).

The pay increase, if it works like any other company, will be based on the results. Not the staff movements.
 
I've asked several times where the money should be spent.

Football club or themselves?
Why not both?

I'm saying- in any company, if it performs & you get new tasks added- you get compensated for it.

So long as they are not sinking ALL the profit into board wages- that seems fair.
 
Why not both?

I'm saying- in any company, if it performs & you get new tasks added- you get compensated for it.

So long as they are not sinking ALL the profit into board wages- that seems fair.

Because the football club has been under supported for so long and the football club is very, very important.

Well thats what Parra, Dogs, Souths, Roosters etc think.

HBG should have the same mindset, board members should be last on the pecking order, its the fricken Pokies that do all the work, anyway.
 
That's Wests Tigers board, one of several things HBG are affiliated with. While they did remove the board members, and reinstated them later (reasons unclear), the CEO resigned- officially. (Yes, it looks designed).

The pay increase, if it works like any other company, will be based on the results. Not the staff movements.
Sure.. so ill ask again.. please provide the details of their results so we can assess their input into the results (as opposed to the results being largely driven by poker machine revenue).
 
Back
Top