HBG Directors give themselves Pay rise

It’s been dubbed ‘the most chaotic board in NSW’. But Wests Tigers’ owners are pushing for a pay rise

By Chris Barrett

March 7, 2026 — 4.21pm
Wests Tigers’ owners are bidding to give themselves a pay rise three months after a shambolic episode in which they sacked chairman Barry O’Farrell and three other directors before backflipping at the behest of the NRL.

The Holman Barnes Group, which owns 90 per cent of the Tigers and holds the licence for the NRL team, has for the past year been embroiled in turmoil that has threatened to spill over into the football club.

Now, its board members are seeking a boost which would see them collect more than their counterparts at most other Sydney clubs with ties to NRL teams.

HBG is proposing that its chairman’s annual honorarium be lifted from $51,341 to $65,000, the deputy chair’s fee to be raised from $33,371 to $50,000, and all other directors to get $32,500 instead of $25,670. All would also receive an extra $5000 if they sit on a club committee.

The effective $70,000 payment per annum for the chairman would eclipse the amounts paid to those in charge at most of Sydney’s major NRL-affiliated leagues clubs, including those with much larger membership bases.

Parramatta Leagues Club, which owns the Eels and has 65,000 members, gives its president $30,000 a year and other directors $20,000.

The 60,000-member Canterbury League Club, which is strongly linked to the Bulldogs and backs them financially, allows for a total of $229,801 to be paid to its seven directors including the chairman – an average of $32,828, although the chair and deputy chair receive a greater share.

St George Leagues Club, which owns 50 per cent of the Dragons and has 25,000 members, hands its chair $16,000 a year and ordinary directors $12,000, plus $2000 for each committee they sit on.

HBG has 27,000 members and the proposed honoraria for its board are exceeded only by those at Penrith NRL team owners Panthers Group, where total revenue was nearly $180 million in 2025 and which has a membership base of 148,000. The Panthers’ chairman receives $80,000 a year, its two deputies get $40,000 each and the remaining directors pick up $20,000 per annum.

Like those at other clubs, the HBG board members can take advantage of other perks of the position such as food and drinks. At the club’s annual general meeting on March 21 members will also be asked to approve its chairman and deputy receiving $500 per month hospitality cards.

As Holman Barnes Group’s business has expanded, the workload and governance responsibilities placed on directors have increased substantially,” said HBG vice-chairman Frank Primerano, who also sits on the Wests Tigers board.

“The proposed adjustments simply bring board honorariums into line with the scale of the organisation and the time commitment required, particularly as directors are increasingly involved in committees and strategic projects during this period of significant growth and investment.”

A source familiar with the activities of HBG, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said: “How can the most chaotic board in NSW simultaneously become one of the highest paid?

“If the stipend for the board were based on performance then quite obviously these people would be getting a pay cut, not a pay day.”

HBG, which oversees venues including Wests Ashfield, returned a net profit of $11.9 million in 2025 after raking in $52 million from poker machines and recording overall revenue of $100 million, according to its annual report.

But the organisation has been plagued by dysfunction during the past 18 months, with several board members controversially removed and former NSW premier O’Farrell and three other independent directors then sensationally axed from the Tigers last December less than a year after they were installed following a governance review.

After concerns were raised by the NRL, HBG reinstated them days later and O’Farrell was Tigers chairman. But the club was forced into a costly payout to Tigers chief executive Shane Richardson, who resigned amid the boardroom chaos 18 months into a four-year contract, and settled out of court with former HBG director Rick Wayde, a key instigator of the Tigers review, after he was banned for eight years.

HBG, which owns the NRL team via its control of Wests Magpies, has since beefed up its representation on the Tigers board, giving it an effective majority.

While the Tigers are governed separately to their owners, NRL funding for the team flows through HBG.

According to its latest financial report, HBG received $20 million from the NRL in 2025 and owes $36 million to players and head coach Benji Marshall over the next five years.

HBG is unusual in that the balance of power lies with 20 so-called debenture holders, who choose the majority of its directors under a decades-old, undemocratic system.

Only two of nine board seats are directly elected by the wider membership and there will not be a ballot for those spots at this month’s AGM after one of the three nominations withdrew.

The two remaining are well known to HBG board members: Shannon Cavanagh, a director of Wests Magpies alongside HBG chairman Dennis Burgess and Primerano, and Aldo Di Mento, a director of APIA Leichardt FC – the inner-west soccer team in which HGB bought a stake last year and on whose board Primerano and HBG chief executive Daniel Paton also sit.
 
6I see your point.

To counterbalance that- what has happened since December that has made you feel like we are going backwards? (ie- since the board/Richo departure- what has HBG/Wests Tigers done toh make you fear things are going backwards),
December 1st happened and HBG pushed out their video release.
Wests tigers ceo resigned.
HBG then reversed their decision and reinstated the directors.

We have heard nothing from hbg since. Not about the decision to reinstate the directors. Not about the CEO resigning. Not about the future.

What have they done to regain a single fans trust? Absolutely squat.

The fact you lot are so oblivious to it once again highlights the complete disconnect with wests tigers fans. It really is quite simple stuff.
 
That's Wests Tigers board, one of several things HBG are affiliated with. While they did remove the board members, and reinstated them later (reasons unclear), the CEO resigned- officially. (Yes, it looks designed).

The pay increase, if it works like any other company, will be based on the results. Not the staff movements.
They would get a whopping salary increase if it was based on staff movements (sackings)
 
December 1st happened and HBG pushed out their video release.
Wests tigers ceo resigned.
HBG then reversed their decision and reinstated the directors.

We have heard nothing from hbg since. Not about the decision to reinstate the directors. Not about the CEO resigning. Not about the future.

What have they done to regain a single fans trust? Absolutely squat.

The fact you lot are so oblivious to it once again highlights the complete disconnect with wests tigers fans. It really is quite simple stuff.
Would HBG getting a media release out regarding how/why things happened ease your mind?
 
Financial records show that HBG are currently liable for $36 million in future player payments and the numbers from their current business takings don't seem to add up. The NRL is doing most of the hard financial lifting to keep us buoyant. We ranked last with a $1.4m loss in 24 / 25.

The AFR wrote an article about HBG's questionable business and accounting practices, as well as our true paying membership statistics in late '24. Previous to '23, HBG would not disclose the paying member tally. The numbers speak for themselves.


Screenshot 2026-03-08 at 3.23.20 pm.png
 
Financial records show that HBG are currently liable for $36 million in future player payments and the numbers from their current business takings don't seem to add up. The NRL is doing most of the hard financial lifting to keep us buoyant. We ranked last with a $1.4m loss in 24 / 25.

The AFR wrote an article about HBG's questionable business and accounting practices, as well as our true paying membership statistics in late '24. Previous to '23, HBG would not disclose the paying member tally. The numbers speak for themselves.


View attachment 35051
It’s a massive concern. And their first point of action is to pay themselves more
 
Financial records show that HBG are currently liable for $36 million in future player payments and the numbers from their current business takings don't seem to add up. The NRL is doing most of the hard financial lifting to keep us buoyant. We ranked last with a $1.4m loss in 24 / 25.

The AFR wrote an article about HBG's questionable business and accounting practices, as well as our true paying membership statistics in late '24. Previous to '23, HBG would not disclose the paying member tally. The numbers speak for themselves.


View attachment 35051
Can you share the AFR article?
 
You know what’s annoying the same 4 people are literally the only people defending this . They never waiver, there’s never nuance or any offers of partisanship. It’s just defend, defend , defend .
It’s to this that you know these people are full of shit and just cheerleading .
Because everyone else goes in and out I’ve noticed . Sometimes on certain subjects they’re staunch anti HBG , yet on others they offer defence , and explanation , or at least apathy .
But the most frustrating thing . Is they frame people with opposing views as having agendas . When all they do is seek repeat , regurgitate the party line ad nauseam .
They won’t even concede the obvious that our governance on all levels has been a joke . My point in all this , is anyone who iis trying to determine what’s up and down in this mess , need only look at people who don’t have the answers. It’s to those people where you can find your North Star in all this .
If you’re a magpies supporter but you see the stench a mile away don’t get sucked into this Balmain v magpies horseshit . It’s all games to stop you questioning people friends and families about thier incompetence .
Can;t be bothered tracking it but its like they are on a roster, punching a timecard taking it in shifts,
A handful have constantly muddied the waters, ran diversion tactics since the hbg thread opened.
But just as humorous are the hand full of the other side, expecting some sensible, reasonable debate and constantly get stone walled and that just turns the whole discussion into a circle jerk
 
Can;t be bothered tracking it but its like they are on a roster, punching a timecard taking it in shifts,
A handful have constantly muddied the waters, ran diversion tactics since the hbg thread opened.
But just as humorous are the hand full of the other side, expecting some sensible, reasonable debate and constantly get stone walled and that just turns the whole discussion into a circle jerk
Guilty as charged. I tried to convince myself that these were just random fans on a forum with a different opinion. The last few days has made it abundantly clear they are not.
 
Back
Top