HBG Directors give themselves Pay rise

It’s been dubbed ‘the most chaotic board in NSW’. But Wests Tigers’ owners are pushing for a pay rise

By Chris Barrett

March 7, 2026 — 4.21pm
Wests Tigers’ owners are bidding to give themselves a pay rise three months after a shambolic episode in which they sacked chairman Barry O’Farrell and three other directors before backflipping at the behest of the NRL.

The Holman Barnes Group, which owns 90 per cent of the Tigers and holds the licence for the NRL team, has for the past year been embroiled in turmoil that has threatened to spill over into the football club.

Now, its board members are seeking a boost which would see them collect more than their counterparts at most other Sydney clubs with ties to NRL teams.

HBG is proposing that its chairman’s annual honorarium be lifted from $51,341 to $65,000, the deputy chair’s fee to be raised from $33,371 to $50,000, and all other directors to get $32,500 instead of $25,670. All would also receive an extra $5000 if they sit on a club committee.

The effective $70,000 payment per annum for the chairman would eclipse the amounts paid to those in charge at most of Sydney’s major NRL-affiliated leagues clubs, including those with much larger membership bases.

Parramatta Leagues Club, which owns the Eels and has 65,000 members, gives its president $30,000 a year and other directors $20,000.

The 60,000-member Canterbury League Club, which is strongly linked to the Bulldogs and backs them financially, allows for a total of $229,801 to be paid to its seven directors including the chairman – an average of $32,828, although the chair and deputy chair receive a greater share.

St George Leagues Club, which owns 50 per cent of the Dragons and has 25,000 members, hands its chair $16,000 a year and ordinary directors $12,000, plus $2000 for each committee they sit on.

HBG has 27,000 members and the proposed honoraria for its board are exceeded only by those at Penrith NRL team owners Panthers Group, where total revenue was nearly $180 million in 2025 and which has a membership base of 148,000. The Panthers’ chairman receives $80,000 a year, its two deputies get $40,000 each and the remaining directors pick up $20,000 per annum.

Like those at other clubs, the HBG board members can take advantage of other perks of the position such as food and drinks. At the club’s annual general meeting on March 21 members will also be asked to approve its chairman and deputy receiving $500 per month hospitality cards.

As Holman Barnes Group’s business has expanded, the workload and governance responsibilities placed on directors have increased substantially,” said HBG vice-chairman Frank Primerano, who also sits on the Wests Tigers board.

“The proposed adjustments simply bring board honorariums into line with the scale of the organisation and the time commitment required, particularly as directors are increasingly involved in committees and strategic projects during this period of significant growth and investment.”

A source familiar with the activities of HBG, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said: “How can the most chaotic board in NSW simultaneously become one of the highest paid?

“If the stipend for the board were based on performance then quite obviously these people would be getting a pay cut, not a pay day.”

HBG, which oversees venues including Wests Ashfield, returned a net profit of $11.9 million in 2025 after raking in $52 million from poker machines and recording overall revenue of $100 million, according to its annual report.

But the organisation has been plagued by dysfunction during the past 18 months, with several board members controversially removed and former NSW premier O’Farrell and three other independent directors then sensationally axed from the Tigers last December less than a year after they were installed following a governance review.

After concerns were raised by the NRL, HBG reinstated them days later and O’Farrell was Tigers chairman. But the club was forced into a costly payout to Tigers chief executive Shane Richardson, who resigned amid the boardroom chaos 18 months into a four-year contract, and settled out of court with former HBG director Rick Wayde, a key instigator of the Tigers review, after he was banned for eight years.

HBG, which owns the NRL team via its control of Wests Magpies, has since beefed up its representation on the Tigers board, giving it an effective majority.

While the Tigers are governed separately to their owners, NRL funding for the team flows through HBG.

According to its latest financial report, HBG received $20 million from the NRL in 2025 and owes $36 million to players and head coach Benji Marshall over the next five years.

HBG is unusual in that the balance of power lies with 20 so-called debenture holders, who choose the majority of its directors under a decades-old, undemocratic system.

Only two of nine board seats are directly elected by the wider membership and there will not be a ballot for those spots at this month’s AGM after one of the three nominations withdrew.

The two remaining are well known to HBG board members: Shannon Cavanagh, a director of Wests Magpies alongside HBG chairman Dennis Burgess and Primerano, and Aldo Di Mento, a director of APIA Leichardt FC – the inner-west soccer team in which HGB bought a stake last year and on whose board Primerano and HBG chief executive Daniel Paton also sit.
 
Simplify it further.

The purpose of the press release was to update fans and stakeholders on significant changes impacting the wests tigers football club. Paton basically said this himself in the statement (im not going back to watch it again).

Since that press release:
- the ceo resigned
- hbg met with PVL
- the board members were invited to return
- an interim ceo has been appointed

So if paton was being truthful about keeping everyone updated, they would have made another statement given the raft of significant changes that have taken place.

Professional organisations communicate. Lets use big technology companies as an example. They get on the front foot every time they have a tech failure or network outage; they own their mistakes.

Weak organisations hide in the shadows and blame others.

HBG's lack of communication indicates they never actually cared about the wests tigers fans and that they only made the statement to protect their own self interest.
It didn’t work though . It was extremely transparent at the first bit of inquiry . Especially when they brought up communication being the main issue … but thier chairman was on the wests tigers board.
And then when the news leaked out about the wests tigers board taking proposals to HBG about even further independence… well that’s why they acted .
I actually think the threat of easts tigers through Richo and a hostile takeover , should certain constitutional changes be approved was their main concern . I’m almost convinced of it . Which is why the board sacking they knew was bullshit , and not lawful , but Richo was the ultimate target .
 
Simplify it further.

The purpose of the press release was to update fans and stakeholders on significant changes impacting the wests tigers football club. Paton basically said this himself in the statement (im not going back to watch it again).

Since that press release:
- the ceo resigned
- hbg met with PVL
- the board members were invited to return
- an interim ceo has been appointed

So if paton was being truthful about keeping everyone updated, they would have made another statement given the raft of significant changes that have taken place.

Professional organisations communicate. Lets use big technology companies as an example. They get on the front foot every time they have a tech failure or network outage; they own their mistakes.

Weak organisations hide in the shadows and blame others.

HBG's lack of communication indicates they never actually cared about the wests tigers fans and that they only made the statement to protect their own self interest.
But-
Richo's resignation was covered on the Wests Tigers website
Barry O'Farrell's return covered on the Wests Tigers website
Shawn Mielekamp's appointment covered on the Wests Tigers website.

You have been kept informed.
 
But-
Richo's resignation was covered on the Wests Tigers website
Barry O'Farrell's return covered on the Wests Tigers website
Shawn Mielekamp's appointment covered on the Wests Tigers website.

You have been kept informed.

Surely your just taking the piss? You know full well being informed is all about the backflip from the original statement. Your either burrying your head in the same or playing games.
 
Announce the board! 🙂
Well yea true . Thats HBG bro…. They keep telling everyone they own the club . Make a decision then and let’s get on with life .
I actually think Denis is a weak man , whos main priority is keeping his seat . People can take that as an attack on him , but I mean it more as an observation . And the reason I say that , is because, I genuinely feel we have gone from bad leadership to bad leadership at HBG , ever since Mike Bailey passed away . Who seemed to command respect and do a decent job . Until the Denis burgess's of the world are replaced by men/ women with strong governance , and good leadership , then HBG is going to continue to be game of thrones on repeat . There’s a power vacuum and it’s been there for 4 years , and will continue until someone with real gravitas gets in there and gets everyone to put the knives away .
 
Technically it is tge Wests Tigers board as they are the majority now. Though i doubt the ridicule is due to the actual ammount of money but more that the HBG believe they are entitled to a payrise making them the highest paid board of an N.R.L team "owner". After all the chaos theyve caused and failure at N.R.L level theyve overseen since becoming majority "owners". True it is the HBG board though now they are in the majority on the Wests Tigers board, they are one and the same imo. Not to mention the constant game of thrones thats happening in the boardroom, its proof of how out of touch, delusional and untouchable they are.
nek minute the WestTigers board is stacked with hbg flunkies ,they also will give themselves a pay rise
Double dip and take the piss out of all of us that can see they should hand their NRL license in
 
Surely your just taking the piss? You know full well being informed is all about the backflip from the original statement. Your either burrying your head in the same or playing games.
No, I'm not.

I'm not sure if legally HBG are in a position to say "We sacked so-and-so because he was rubbish at his job & didn't change his underwear" to appease fans curiosity or not.

The information some people want isn't 'necessary' to supporting a football club. You don't NEED to know who or why any of these people are removed. You want to know. I want to know.

I hope we find out.

But if we don't- HBG don't HAVE to tell anyone why they removed people. They released a statement. You can take it for it's worth or you can call it rubbish.

We may never know the truth of it. The results of what they did are the most important thing to come out of it all.
 
Birds release hasn't been announced because if we do announce it after round 1 he can be included in our top 30 for 2026 and we don't need to replace him.
Hey because we haven’t announced it yet, does that affect bird being able to play in the uk ? Ie. he can’t play for Leeds until we make a formal announcement
 
No, I'm not.

I'm not sure if legally HBG are in a position to say "We sacked so-and-so because he was rubbish at his job & didn't change his underwear" to appease fans curiosity or not.

The information some people want isn't 'necessary' to supporting a football club. You don't NEED to know who or why any of these people are removed. You want to know. I want to know.

I hope we find out.

But if we don't- HBG don't HAVE to tell anyone why they removed people. They released a statement. You can take it for it's worth or you can call it rubbish.

We may never know the truth of it. The results of what they did are the most important thing to come out of it all.

What? They were forced to reinstate them. No one is asking for them to tell us again why they sacked them, we want to know why they were reinstated. That wpuld then help us understand how bad the original decision was. And that there is why they dont want to tell us
 
Well yea true . Thats HBG bro…. They keep telling everyone they own the club . Make a decision then and let’s get on with life .
I actually think Denis is a weak man , whos main priority is keeping his seat . People can take that as an attack on him , but I mean it more as an observation . And the reason I say that , is because, I genuinely feel we have gone from bad leadership to bad leadership at HBG , ever since Mike Bailey passed away . Who seemed to command respect and do a decent job . Until the Denis burgess's of the world are replaced by men/ women with strong governance , and good leadership , then HBG is going to continue to be game of thrones on repeat . There’s a power vacuum and it’s been there for 4 years , and will continue until someone with real gravitas gets in there and gets everyone to put the knives away .
I don't disagree. Pretty sure Dennis isn't the type of guy I'd choose to hang out with.

Be very interesting to see the direction of their board in the future & if guys like Allan Fallah play a role.
 
But-
Richo's resignation was covered on the Wests Tigers website
Barry O'Farrell's return covered on the Wests Tigers website
Shawn Mielekamp's appointment covered on the Wests Tigers website.

You have been kept informed.
Im talking to a brick wall.

HBG decided to own the sacking with the presser... and have outsourced all accountability and responsibility when it hit the fan.

They are different entities when they want to be.. but now your playing that it's all wests tigers football club

And they wonder why we all hate them.

Edit - they havent updated anyone on the reinstatement of the directors, which was their doing.
 
What? They were forced to reinstate them. No one is asking for them to tell us again why they sacked them, we want to know why they were reinstated. That wpuld then help us understand how bad the original decision was. And that there is why they dont want to tell us
I wrote this earlier-

I'm not 100% sure the issue was ever the independent directors & more a case that HBG didn't feel things were working as stipulated in what they agreed on- and therefore removed all the independents to go back to Ground Zero.

It could go some way to why they offered some of those roles back at a later date. It wasn't about the individuals on the board so much as the composition. Maybe?

Could it be to do with the legal terminology used in how the board was put together? The only way to restructure it was to dismantle it? Start again?
 
I don't disagree. Pretty sure Dennis isn't the type of guy I'd choose to hang out with.

Be very interesting to see the direction of their board in the future & if guys like Allan Fallah play a role.
I actually don’t give a shit who’s on the wests tigers board , and I think @cochise is the same ; as long as they have the right skills to be there and those skills are being correctly utilised .
The issue has and always was , for the largest portion of wests tigers history we’ve had 80s pop stars , used car salesmen and real estate agents making huge decisions on governance , somethings involving state and federal parliament like the COE funding and LO upgrades , and these guys having the ability to dictate to coaches on player retentions and signings .
The biggest one I can remember was when we signed Willie Mason , and someone on the board had a massive sook , and we had to reneg on the deal . He played another 2-3 years for Newcastle from memory , with those first 2 years being high quality . It was brain dead .
 
Im talking to a brick wall.

HBG decided to own the sacking with the presser... and have outsourced all accountability and responsibility when it hit the fan.

They are different entities when they want to be.. but now your playing that it's all wests tigers football club

And they wonder why we all hate them.
Other than what PVL told them in their secret meeting, what were you not kept up to date on?
 
Back
Top