HBG Directors give themselves Pay rise

It’s been dubbed ‘the most chaotic board in NSW’. But Wests Tigers’ owners are pushing for a pay rise

By Chris Barrett

March 7, 2026 — 4.21pm
Wests Tigers’ owners are bidding to give themselves a pay rise three months after a shambolic episode in which they sacked chairman Barry O’Farrell and three other directors before backflipping at the behest of the NRL.

The Holman Barnes Group, which owns 90 per cent of the Tigers and holds the licence for the NRL team, has for the past year been embroiled in turmoil that has threatened to spill over into the football club.

Now, its board members are seeking a boost which would see them collect more than their counterparts at most other Sydney clubs with ties to NRL teams.

HBG is proposing that its chairman’s annual honorarium be lifted from $51,341 to $65,000, the deputy chair’s fee to be raised from $33,371 to $50,000, and all other directors to get $32,500 instead of $25,670. All would also receive an extra $5000 if they sit on a club committee.

The effective $70,000 payment per annum for the chairman would eclipse the amounts paid to those in charge at most of Sydney’s major NRL-affiliated leagues clubs, including those with much larger membership bases.

Parramatta Leagues Club, which owns the Eels and has 65,000 members, gives its president $30,000 a year and other directors $20,000.

The 60,000-member Canterbury League Club, which is strongly linked to the Bulldogs and backs them financially, allows for a total of $229,801 to be paid to its seven directors including the chairman – an average of $32,828, although the chair and deputy chair receive a greater share.

St George Leagues Club, which owns 50 per cent of the Dragons and has 25,000 members, hands its chair $16,000 a year and ordinary directors $12,000, plus $2000 for each committee they sit on.

HBG has 27,000 members and the proposed honoraria for its board are exceeded only by those at Penrith NRL team owners Panthers Group, where total revenue was nearly $180 million in 2025 and which has a membership base of 148,000. The Panthers’ chairman receives $80,000 a year, its two deputies get $40,000 each and the remaining directors pick up $20,000 per annum.

Like those at other clubs, the HBG board members can take advantage of other perks of the position such as food and drinks. At the club’s annual general meeting on March 21 members will also be asked to approve its chairman and deputy receiving $500 per month hospitality cards.

As Holman Barnes Group’s business has expanded, the workload and governance responsibilities placed on directors have increased substantially,” said HBG vice-chairman Frank Primerano, who also sits on the Wests Tigers board.

“The proposed adjustments simply bring board honorariums into line with the scale of the organisation and the time commitment required, particularly as directors are increasingly involved in committees and strategic projects during this period of significant growth and investment.”

A source familiar with the activities of HBG, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said: “How can the most chaotic board in NSW simultaneously become one of the highest paid?

“If the stipend for the board were based on performance then quite obviously these people would be getting a pay cut, not a pay day.”

HBG, which oversees venues including Wests Ashfield, returned a net profit of $11.9 million in 2025 after raking in $52 million from poker machines and recording overall revenue of $100 million, according to its annual report.

But the organisation has been plagued by dysfunction during the past 18 months, with several board members controversially removed and former NSW premier O’Farrell and three other independent directors then sensationally axed from the Tigers last December less than a year after they were installed following a governance review.

After concerns were raised by the NRL, HBG reinstated them days later and O’Farrell was Tigers chairman. But the club was forced into a costly payout to Tigers chief executive Shane Richardson, who resigned amid the boardroom chaos 18 months into a four-year contract, and settled out of court with former HBG director Rick Wayde, a key instigator of the Tigers review, after he was banned for eight years.

HBG, which owns the NRL team via its control of Wests Magpies, has since beefed up its representation on the Tigers board, giving it an effective majority.

While the Tigers are governed separately to their owners, NRL funding for the team flows through HBG.

According to its latest financial report, HBG received $20 million from the NRL in 2025 and owes $36 million to players and head coach Benji Marshall over the next five years.

HBG is unusual in that the balance of power lies with 20 so-called debenture holders, who choose the majority of its directors under a decades-old, undemocratic system.

Only two of nine board seats are directly elected by the wider membership and there will not be a ballot for those spots at this month’s AGM after one of the three nominations withdrew.

The two remaining are well known to HBG board members: Shannon Cavanagh, a director of Wests Magpies alongside HBG chairman Dennis Burgess and Primerano, and Aldo Di Mento, a director of APIA Leichardt FC – the inner-west soccer team in which HGB bought a stake last year and on whose board Primerano and HBG chief executive Daniel Paton also sit.
 
Definitley not the same as the Riff, but that was not the point I was making. It is the transformation of the owners from seeing WT as a financial burden to giving us money and considering us as an asset at the same time.

I don't understand the reasoning behind the scheduling at Lidcombe, but suspect it is probably driven by Wests Magpies for the reasons you outlined. As for which game they attend - probably depends on where the centre of gravity lies with the debenture holders as that is the entity that gets you elected and your new blazer.
I understand what your point is.. I also understand what the vision is..

My point is that HBG/Wests Ashfiled had 8 opportunities to promote the magpies KOE side infront of packed nrl crowds this year, but are instead of playing them at lidcombe oval in front of 300 people.

They wouldnt know opportunity if it landed on their lap.

The wests tigers brand will always be 2nd to the wests magpies. Thats just the way it will always be when the wests magpies own the wests tigers.

Until they get new blood on their boards (all of them), then meaningful change is a pipe dream
 
I understand what your point is.. I also understand what the vision is..

My point is that HBG/Wests Ashfiled had 8 opportunities to promote the magpies KOE side infront of packed nrl crowds this year, but are instead of playing them at lidcombe oval in front of 300 people.

They wouldnt know opportunity if it landed on their lap.

The wests tigers brand will always be 2nd to the wests magpies. Thats just the way it will always be when the wests magpies own the wests tigers.

Until they get new blood on their boards (all of them), then meaningful change is a pipe dream
Sorry, I misunderstood your post.

Yep definitely a steep hill to climb; but I think it is the only option and HBG either need to become self aware and act or the pressure from outside will continue to mount.

It will be intersting to see if @Chunk gets a reply to his question about the scheduling.
 
I understand what your point is.. I also understand what the vision is..

My point is that HBG/Wests Ashfiled had 8 opportunities to promote the magpies KOE side infront of packed nrl crowds this year, but are instead of playing them at lidcombe oval in front of 300 people.

They wouldnt know opportunity if it landed on their lap.

The wests tigers brand will always be 2nd to the wests magpies. Thats just the way it will always be when the wests magpies own the wests tigers.

Until they get new blood on their boards (all of them), then meaningful change is a pipe dream
To be fair, I've been to cup games prior to the NRL game and there's also only hundreds, not thousands there.
The hour between games for the NRL team to warm up kills the chance of any decent size crowd..
 
You can run an NRL club with that grant. It is exactly $19m ($14m for players and $5m for support staff).

You need a lot more money than that to run a successful club and entire football department IMO.
That's true. It's up to the club to get sponsors , members/ game day income and merchandise to make it profitable. I think they need to address that before asking for grants.
Everytime a new club comes in we're just getting further behind.
 
That's true. It's up to the club to get sponsors , members/ game day income and merchandise to make it profitable. I think they need to address that before asking for grants.
Everytime a new club comes in we're just getting further behind.
HBG Annual statement said we had $6.4m of sponsorship and I think Brisbane Annual report said $9m (for 2024, after their GF year)

Considering the sizes of two clubs, not that big a difference imo.

That's not saying that we are doing good, I just don't think a million dollars extra would help.

Also sponsorship is usually annually. If you make some good purchases, you may get good sponsors on board but it won't sustain if your team isn't performing.

Its not a long term viable option.

As I mentioned to Hammer before, I understand what you guys are saying is important, but I think the biggest priority has to be to get the owners to invest. They're the ones with the most to gain. They have the biggest purse, the brand and the stakes.
 
Sorry, I misunderstood your post.

Yep definitely a steep hill to climb; but I think it is the only option and HBG either need to become self aware and act or the pressure from outside will continue to mount.

It will be intersting to see if @Chunk gets a reply to his question about the scheduling.
I just think it’s mental to own a sporting franchise in 2026 , anywhere in the world , and be talking about profit and tha team being a black hole . The more you spend the more success , the more the asset grows in value . The biggest clubs in the world lose money most years , but each year hire value grows exponentially. I think the lakers, and Man U are worth 4-5 billion dollars ,and each of those teams have found it near on impossible to win because they chose to run thier teams as a business , rather than when they did have success it was run to win .
Having tight arses as owners has never been a recipe for success.
 
Magpies have a 20 odd year lease at Lidcombe it aint changing anytime soon...especially after they.secured the $3m upgrade of which WTs contributed $300k

I think the important thing is that we’re working really closely with Wests Tigers, because we always said that we wanted Lidcombe Oval to be an outlet if they needed it in any way for games or training.

Leo Epifania
🤣 🤣 🤣
 

The notice of the HBG AGM is linked from the home page above including the pay rise resolutions and election of director resolutions.
 
Triple M NRL Daily includes a discussion between Pengilly & Weidler on the HBG board (about 17 minute mark). Apparently Dennis Burgess & Daniel Paton did not return any calls or messages to Pengilly, was passed onto a crisis management PR person lol

 
Triple M NRL Daily includes a discussion between Pengilly & Weidler on the HBG board (about 17 minute mark). Apparently Dennis Burgess & Daniel Paton did not return any calls or messages to Pengilly, was passed onto a crisis management PR person lol

FF to 17 minute mark.

Scathing assessment of the corruption ans self interest at HBG
 
To be fair, I've been to cup games prior to the NRL game and there's also only hundreds, not thousands there.
The hour between games for the NRL team to warm up kills the chance of any decent size crowd..
Yeah thats true...
At leichardt the players used to warm up on one of those ovals at the back. Same with the bears at north Sydney oval. I preferred it that way, made the build up to the game better where you didnt see the players
 
Back
Top