HBG Directors give themselves Pay rise

It’s been dubbed ‘the most chaotic board in NSW’. But Wests Tigers’ owners are pushing for a pay rise

By Chris Barrett

March 7, 2026 — 4.21pm
Wests Tigers’ owners are bidding to give themselves a pay rise three months after a shambolic episode in which they sacked chairman Barry O’Farrell and three other directors before backflipping at the behest of the NRL.

The Holman Barnes Group, which owns 90 per cent of the Tigers and holds the licence for the NRL team, has for the past year been embroiled in turmoil that has threatened to spill over into the football club.

Now, its board members are seeking a boost which would see them collect more than their counterparts at most other Sydney clubs with ties to NRL teams.

HBG is proposing that its chairman’s annual honorarium be lifted from $51,341 to $65,000, the deputy chair’s fee to be raised from $33,371 to $50,000, and all other directors to get $32,500 instead of $25,670. All would also receive an extra $5000 if they sit on a club committee.

The effective $70,000 payment per annum for the chairman would eclipse the amounts paid to those in charge at most of Sydney’s major NRL-affiliated leagues clubs, including those with much larger membership bases.

Parramatta Leagues Club, which owns the Eels and has 65,000 members, gives its president $30,000 a year and other directors $20,000.

The 60,000-member Canterbury League Club, which is strongly linked to the Bulldogs and backs them financially, allows for a total of $229,801 to be paid to its seven directors including the chairman – an average of $32,828, although the chair and deputy chair receive a greater share.

St George Leagues Club, which owns 50 per cent of the Dragons and has 25,000 members, hands its chair $16,000 a year and ordinary directors $12,000, plus $2000 for each committee they sit on.

HBG has 27,000 members and the proposed honoraria for its board are exceeded only by those at Penrith NRL team owners Panthers Group, where total revenue was nearly $180 million in 2025 and which has a membership base of 148,000. The Panthers’ chairman receives $80,000 a year, its two deputies get $40,000 each and the remaining directors pick up $20,000 per annum.

Like those at other clubs, the HBG board members can take advantage of other perks of the position such as food and drinks. At the club’s annual general meeting on March 21 members will also be asked to approve its chairman and deputy receiving $500 per month hospitality cards.

As Holman Barnes Group’s business has expanded, the workload and governance responsibilities placed on directors have increased substantially,” said HBG vice-chairman Frank Primerano, who also sits on the Wests Tigers board.

“The proposed adjustments simply bring board honorariums into line with the scale of the organisation and the time commitment required, particularly as directors are increasingly involved in committees and strategic projects during this period of significant growth and investment.”

A source familiar with the activities of HBG, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said: “How can the most chaotic board in NSW simultaneously become one of the highest paid?

“If the stipend for the board were based on performance then quite obviously these people would be getting a pay cut, not a pay day.”

HBG, which oversees venues including Wests Ashfield, returned a net profit of $11.9 million in 2025 after raking in $52 million from poker machines and recording overall revenue of $100 million, according to its annual report.

But the organisation has been plagued by dysfunction during the past 18 months, with several board members controversially removed and former NSW premier O’Farrell and three other independent directors then sensationally axed from the Tigers last December less than a year after they were installed following a governance review.

After concerns were raised by the NRL, HBG reinstated them days later and O’Farrell was Tigers chairman. But the club was forced into a costly payout to Tigers chief executive Shane Richardson, who resigned amid the boardroom chaos 18 months into a four-year contract, and settled out of court with former HBG director Rick Wayde, a key instigator of the Tigers review, after he was banned for eight years.

HBG, which owns the NRL team via its control of Wests Magpies, has since beefed up its representation on the Tigers board, giving it an effective majority.

While the Tigers are governed separately to their owners, NRL funding for the team flows through HBG.

According to its latest financial report, HBG received $20 million from the NRL in 2025 and owes $36 million to players and head coach Benji Marshall over the next five years.

HBG is unusual in that the balance of power lies with 20 so-called debenture holders, who choose the majority of its directors under a decades-old, undemocratic system.

Only two of nine board seats are directly elected by the wider membership and there will not be a ballot for those spots at this month’s AGM after one of the three nominations withdrew.

The two remaining are well known to HBG board members: Shannon Cavanagh, a director of Wests Magpies alongside HBG chairman Dennis Burgess and Primerano, and Aldo Di Mento, a director of APIA Leichardt FC – the inner-west soccer team in which HGB bought a stake last year and on whose board Primerano and HBG chief executive Daniel Paton also sit.
 
The magpies are respected. Foundation club. Were all part of an incredible history and one i still want reflected in the club as it makes us richer.

Our leadership are the issue. Not magpies. HBG cop it because they have had full control since 2016, and have done some real idiotic moves. Same for stupid balmain that left them carrying the baton.

If they had left the independant board, theyd be heros.
This
 
All Wests Tigers fans should also follow Wests Magpies being our feeder team.
Remember the team that feeds players to become Wests Tigers players, does Makasini ring a bell ?
Im out at lidcombe regularly.

Im sure ink still engages with the Magpies, what evidence do you have he doesn't follow them?
 
Im out at lidcombe regularly.

Im sure ink still engages with the Magpies, what evidence do you have he doesn't follow them?
His comments that are getting more and more constant in ridiculing anyone who expresses their support for the Magpies.
Ink and yourself frustrate me as I know deep down you are 2 of our very best supporters, but you both do not realise how influential you are to our supporter base and you can both help unite the club better than anyone if you go about it the right way.
 
His comments that are getting more and more constant in ridiculing anyone who expresses their support for the Magpies.
Ink and yourself frustrate me as I know deep down you are 2 of our very best supporters, but you both do not realise how influential you are to our supporter base and you can both help unite the club better than anyone if you go about it the right way.
We were united in November, it wasn't our actions that caused division.
 
All Wests Tigers fans should also follow Wests Magpies being our feeder team.
Remember the team that feeds players to become Wests Tigers players, does Makasini ring a bell ?
All Wests Tigers fans should put their allegiance to Wests Magpies aside when judging there poor sustained performance of our governance - but they don't.
The very reason why we have had trouble convincing players like Makasini that he can achieve success at this club.
Who was the last player that achieved any level of success by committing to this club compared to those who have left and found it elsewhere?
 
His comments that are getting more and more constant in ridiculing anyone who expresses their support for the Magpies.
Ink and yourself frustrate me as I know deep down you are 2 of our very best supporters, but you both do not realise how influential you are to our supporter base and you can both help unite the club better than anyone if you go about it the right way.
I think nearly everyone supports an individuals support of Wests magpies or Balmain tigers, with the flow on support for Wests Tigers NRL team.

The only constant argument I see is in regard to HBG actions in relation to Wests Tigers, that ‘some’ seem to want to translate as a slight on Wests magpies.

HBG is the main entity that needs to unite the club, if they go about it the right way.
 
Stick with your expert player ID analysis.
Purdue would not be a top class fullback, that tells me everything about your knowledge.
So not only is Purdue all of a sudden a fullback (despite never playing there against men)
Now he’s a top line fullback…
Yeah - righto bro!!

This time next week, he’ll be a dally m, Clive Churchill and premiership winning, leading try scorer and future immortal fullback - all before ever playing there.

You gotta be his manager or his mum…
Either way, you look Stupider every time you mention him.

Have a word to Payto on the weekend mate - you just might single handedly save his career with your wisdom.
 
People are making out they are outraged by a photo that you yourself admitted earlier is nothing to be outraged over.
You know, I know, everyone knows it’s a nothing story that some people want to try and make into a big issue.
I never said anything about my opinion . I said it was irrelevant . Because it is . I never gave it though. I know standards and what it allowed at leadership positions . And that isn’t it . No matter what squirming and contorting you want to do . The things you walk past are the things you accept .
And that is once again a sign of the poor leadership we have in our club . And the poor leadership quality in the spotlight … decision making . Regardless of what moral opinion he may have , only the dumbest human alive would think that in the current climate of being on a board associated with wests tigers would you think that is. A good idea . Purely on perception and making good choices around the brand you represent re. HBG and its subsidiary and ultimately bigger brand the wests tigers . And to double down on that stupidity and defend it. Even worse decision making . And ultimately really poor leadership .
 
So are yoh doubting his ability as a fullback ?
I’m fairly certain Drinkwater is playing, so I don’t think we will know anymore about it this weekend.
All I keep hearing from everybody analysing the game including our own fans is the Cowboys have 3 extremely dangerous players being Dearden, Drinkwater and Purdue.
He will get less opportunities in the centres which is a good thing for us.
No I’m saying Purdue will be a gun at fullback . I think I’ve misunderstood your post . If you’re saying Purdue is a weapon and could be anything at fullback .. If that’s the case I apologise .
 
So not only is Purdue all of a sudden a fullback (despite never playing there against men)
Now he’s a top line fullback…
Yeah - righto bro!!

This time next week, he’ll be a dally m, Clive Churchill and premiership winning, leading try scorer and future immortal fullback - all before ever playing there.

You gotta be his manager or his mum…
Either way, you look Stupider every time you mention him.

Have a word to Payto on the weekend mate - you just might single handedly save his career with your wisdom.
Have you watched him in broken field . Like when he tore us apart down the edge last year . He did that multiple times . Really good out of yardage , sniffing around the ruck when they get half opportunities , all natural signs that the transition to fullback is a great decision if he makes it Z
He’s big and fast and strong and skilful , so my guess is most teams he would have been in as a junior would have had him at 6 because he would be on the ball all the time. But that doesn’t mean that’s ultimately his best position. Like putting the really fast , agile kid at fullback . When he comes to grade often that kid transitions to the wing .
And often the big strong fast skilful kid transitions out of five eighth. Sometimes to fullback and centre , others to the edge backrow or lock , depending on where they sit on the spectrum of size —- speed .
 
Back
Top