HBG Directors give themselves Pay rise

Status
Not open for further replies.

It’s been dubbed ‘the most chaotic board in NSW’. But Wests Tigers’ owners are pushing for a pay rise

By Chris Barrett

March 7, 2026 — 4.21pm
Wests Tigers’ owners are bidding to give themselves a pay rise three months after a shambolic episode in which they sacked chairman Barry O’Farrell and three other directors before backflipping at the behest of the NRL.

The Holman Barnes Group, which owns 90 per cent of the Tigers and holds the licence for the NRL team, has for the past year been embroiled in turmoil that has threatened to spill over into the football club.

Now, its board members are seeking a boost which would see them collect more than their counterparts at most other Sydney clubs with ties to NRL teams.

HBG is proposing that its chairman’s annual honorarium be lifted from $51,341 to $65,000, the deputy chair’s fee to be raised from $33,371 to $50,000, and all other directors to get $32,500 instead of $25,670. All would also receive an extra $5000 if they sit on a club committee.

The effective $70,000 payment per annum for the chairman would eclipse the amounts paid to those in charge at most of Sydney’s major NRL-affiliated leagues clubs, including those with much larger membership bases.

Parramatta Leagues Club, which owns the Eels and has 65,000 members, gives its president $30,000 a year and other directors $20,000.

The 60,000-member Canterbury League Club, which is strongly linked to the Bulldogs and backs them financially, allows for a total of $229,801 to be paid to its seven directors including the chairman – an average of $32,828, although the chair and deputy chair receive a greater share.

St George Leagues Club, which owns 50 per cent of the Dragons and has 25,000 members, hands its chair $16,000 a year and ordinary directors $12,000, plus $2000 for each committee they sit on.

HBG has 27,000 members and the proposed honoraria for its board are exceeded only by those at Penrith NRL team owners Panthers Group, where total revenue was nearly $180 million in 2025 and which has a membership base of 148,000. The Panthers’ chairman receives $80,000 a year, its two deputies get $40,000 each and the remaining directors pick up $20,000 per annum.

Like those at other clubs, the HBG board members can take advantage of other perks of the position such as food and drinks. At the club’s annual general meeting on March 21 members will also be asked to approve its chairman and deputy receiving $500 per month hospitality cards.

As Holman Barnes Group’s business has expanded, the workload and governance responsibilities placed on directors have increased substantially,” said HBG vice-chairman Frank Primerano, who also sits on the Wests Tigers board.

“The proposed adjustments simply bring board honorariums into line with the scale of the organisation and the time commitment required, particularly as directors are increasingly involved in committees and strategic projects during this period of significant growth and investment.”

A source familiar with the activities of HBG, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said: “How can the most chaotic board in NSW simultaneously become one of the highest paid?

“If the stipend for the board were based on performance then quite obviously these people would be getting a pay cut, not a pay day.”

HBG, which oversees venues including Wests Ashfield, returned a net profit of $11.9 million in 2025 after raking in $52 million from poker machines and recording overall revenue of $100 million, according to its annual report.

But the organisation has been plagued by dysfunction during the past 18 months, with several board members controversially removed and former NSW premier O’Farrell and three other independent directors then sensationally axed from the Tigers last December less than a year after they were installed following a governance review.

After concerns were raised by the NRL, HBG reinstated them days later and O’Farrell was Tigers chairman. But the club was forced into a costly payout to Tigers chief executive Shane Richardson, who resigned amid the boardroom chaos 18 months into a four-year contract, and settled out of court with former HBG director Rick Wayde, a key instigator of the Tigers review, after he was banned for eight years.

HBG, which owns the NRL team via its control of Wests Magpies, has since beefed up its representation on the Tigers board, giving it an effective majority.

While the Tigers are governed separately to their owners, NRL funding for the team flows through HBG.

According to its latest financial report, HBG received $20 million from the NRL in 2025 and owes $36 million to players and head coach Benji Marshall over the next five years.

HBG is unusual in that the balance of power lies with 20 so-called debenture holders, who choose the majority of its directors under a decades-old, undemocratic system.

Only two of nine board seats are directly elected by the wider membership and there will not be a ballot for those spots at this month’s AGM after one of the three nominations withdrew.

The two remaining are well known to HBG board members: Shannon Cavanagh, a director of Wests Magpies alongside HBG chairman Dennis Burgess and Primerano, and Aldo Di Mento, a director of APIA Leichardt FC – the inner-west soccer team in which HGB bought a stake last year and on whose board Primerano and HBG chief executive Daniel Paton also sit.
 
Fridgey - I dont think anyone is trying to turn the tide toward HBG.

But even you, peering through your red mist must acknowledge, there's a political game being played here. One or two of us here are simply playing devil's advocate against the maelstrom of the mob.
Political game playing is a load of balls, it's your pin up boys making the never-ending blunders, no one else.
 
Because Vicious can't provide facts... he tried to claim last week that after Galvins contract situation the club wanted Richo as far away from recruiting & player retention as possible. When I brought up that Terrell recently said him & his manager were speaking with Richo about extending his contract up until the time Richo had left he stopped replying.

Galvin asked for his first release before Richo actually started yeah?
 
He has already been found out as using gullible mainly young Wests Tigers fans to try and push his own agendas.
So anyone who doesnt see things through your eyes is gullible.
JUst for one minute look at the calamity that has occured at board level at this club for - just the last two seasons without going back any further - opinions have been formed about WTs governance based on their own actions given that HBG/ Wests Ashfield are in control and turn on each other - say one thing then self sabotage.
There is no outside influence responsible for their actions - who else should be held accountable?
Is that not a fact?
 
Also "reportedly" didn't think the coaching team - specifically Benji - could take his game to the next level.
Ok you know better and Richo was brilliant during all player negotiations.
Nobody was unhappy with any of his negotiations and everything good was done was because of him and very little to do with Benji.
Sounds pretty stupid doesn’t it ?
But we will run with that if it makes you happy and suits your agenda.
 
Last edited:
Ok you know better and Richo was brilliant during all player negotiations.
Nobody was unhappy with any of his negotiations and everything done was because of him and very little to do with Benji.
Sounds pretty stupid doesn’t it ?
But we will run with that if it makes you happy and suits your agenda.
Didn't say that at all. Im sure Benji was also a factor in recruitment. Together they had most say in assembling the squad - as it should be in clubs with harmonious governance pulling in the same direction and allowing people to do the jobs that their role requires.
Your the one attributing individual blame on Richardson, when there is just as much evidence to suggest that the Galvins did not have faith in the club or the coach and it didn't matter who was doing the negotiations.
 
Didn't say that at all. Im sure Benji was also a factor in recruitment. Together they had most say in assembling the squad - as it should be in clubs with harmonious governance pulling in the same direction and allowing people to do the jobs that their role requires.
Your the one attributing individual blame on Richardson, when there is just as much evidence to suggest that the Galvins did not have faith in the club or the coach and it didn't matter who was doing the negotiations.
Richo has not been actively involved for a few months now and the rugby league department has not fallen apart without him.
Why are we even still talking about Richo when Shaun Mielekamp is doing a great job ?
 
Well....harassing females on the forum isnt an endearing trait to most...pretty gutless really
What a disgraceful thing to say.
I have never brought gender into any of my posts.
I debate the topic at hand, I answer, rebuke or agree with posts from all forum contributors.
I haven’t “harassed” anyone

And this is what you come up with in response to my playful post.
Geez mate, you’ve crossed a line here.
An apology is due 🥴
 
Why?
because thats where you diverted this topic ...post 1034
Forget about it, it’s now old news.
Have you got something constructive to say about the positive on field results or would you prefer to keep the focus on stalking board members or associates social media pages to see if you can find some more dirt on them ?
 
That’s probably his best one.
He’s no longer part of Wests Tigers, stop talking about him and focus on the future, not the past.
So you can downgrade him to defend the actions of those you blindly support but then want to shut down chat when any of the numerous positives are pointed out...don't think it works that way on here.
 
So what happens if we win the Premiership this season, will you still be focusing on the HBG ownership and Richo choosing to leave, or will you finally be over it ?

Are you suggesting HBG blowing the board up in December would have been the catalyst of us winning the comp if it indeed happened?
 
Are you suggesting HBG blowing the board up in December would have been the catalyst of us winning the comp if it indeed happened?
No I didn’t suggest that at all.
I’m suggesting anyone that continues to try and unnecessarily dig up dirt and cause trouble for the sake of it, is not doing it with the best interests of Wests Tigers rugby league club who are currently heading in a good direction.
At least you have a very good knowledge of all things rugby league which you demonstrate in some of your posts, but there are a few people who clearly lack general rugby league knowledge yet love getting involved in anything that could potentially cause trouble and effect Wests Tigers rugby league operation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Back
Top