HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

I'd like to hear from Chad 🇹🇩

@The Chad
What's your take on all this?
I'll do this in point form so that people can pick me apart individually.

If Barry O'Farrell is the best choice- that's fantastic news.

It's interesting that O'Farrell would agree to work with HBG again. It would seem unlikely he would do it under duress. Maybe some home truths were meshed out between the two parties?

Nothing changes my stance that people are reacting like they 'know' more than they actually do. Even now- there's been 3 or 4 theories being treated as fact.

None of the things I've said about HBG have changed.

None of the things I've said about how I want the club to be have changed.

People trying to take shots at me...hasn't changed. 😀

And I still don't know anything- other than how to cut & paste now.
 
So they blow the joint up whilst we were in the best standings and are we've had for over a decade for what getting rid of Richo perhaps. All this on the say so of some deviant that quite frankly looks like something the cat dragged in. Unbelievable but yet so very believable, if you didn't laugh you could cry. Deadset we must be the laughing stock of the nrl, for the record i don't see second coming of Richo, i think a line could have been drawn in the sand there particularly if even some of what Chammas said has a grain of truth to it.
 
After reading the embarrassing attempts at logic by those puppets of HBG on this forum, may I suggest that the erstwhile controllers of this excellent vehicle for mostly sensible conversation, take a less generous tolerance to their bile. I for one, would like to see them banned for life and indeed in other times people like this where dealt with in the appropriate manner. I know that public floggings and the occasional guillotining is frowned upon these days (more the pity) but I think there is a very strong case for this in such dire times. For your consideration.
Well, you've just proven a lot of what I've been saying.

Get on board the company line or get ready to be abused without controls in place.
 
I'll do this in point form so that people can pick me apart individually.

If Barry O'Farrell is the best choice- that's fantastic news.

It's interesting that O'Farrell would agree to work with HBG again. It would seem unlikely he would do it under duress. Maybe some home truths were meshed out between the two parties?

Nothing changes my stance that people are reacting like they 'know' more than they actually do. Even now- there's been 3 or 4 theories being treated as fact.

None of the things I've said about HBG have changed.

None of the things I've said about how I want the club to be have changed.

People trying to take shots at me...hasn't changed. 😀

And I still don't know anything- other than how to cut & paste now.
thank you for taking the time to present your thoughts in such a neatly structured format.

You are right that it will make it easier for everyone to dismantle your arguments one bullet point at a time.
 
As a forum content creator, you really should expect this level of audience interaction, Chad. Some of us are only here for your plot twists.
I'm not that interesting.

But what IS interesting is that it appears to be perfectly acceptable for a large number of people to join in on a mob mentality of 'pick on the weaker number' if the opinion doesn't exactly match the company line.

Call people what you like, if they don't agree with the majority.

In fact, make an open suggestion to ban those posters for having a contrary opinion.

And nobody calls it out.
 
You and I are friends. I agree with everything you say. At least publicly. I simply facilitate discussion between you and the wider group. I'm trying to help you!
I know that. (Didn't expect to know so much in one day).

I try real hard not to tell people they are 'wrong'. I do try to give an alternative view point. I think you get that. Not everyone can see through the mock self-induce rage over things out of their control.
 
I'm not that interesting.

But what IS interesting is that it appears to be perfectly acceptable for a large number of people to join in on a mob mentality of 'pick on the weaker number' if the opinion doesn't exactly match the company line.

Call people what you like, if they don't agree with the majority.

In fact, make an open suggestion to ban those posters for having a contrary opinion.

And nobody calls it out.
Now you know how criminal defense lawyers feel.
 
I know that. (Didn't expect to know so much in one day).

I try real hard not to tell people they are 'wrong'. I do try to give an alternative view point. I think you get that. Not everyone can see through the mock self-induce rage over things out of their control.
Perhaps I could put it into perspective?

You're trying to offer an obscure viewpoint to people that have had their club systematically destroyed over a 10 year period. Maybe you're super chilled about everything, but I know you're smart enough to realise that you'd be in the minority.

All this at a time when the latest balls up is not only fresh, but developing and getting more outrageous with every news report.

if you were expecting people to engage in a rational and unemotional way to a contrarian viewpoint, that some may argue was stirring the pot, then perhaps you need to lower your expectations a little.
 

Staff online

Back
Top