HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

Hand picking what to argue.

I've not said there is no information. Just that we don't have all the information.

I don't think ANY of those people lied. That's the difference. The anti-HBG mob will have you believe that their reasoning was a lie.

I'm suggesting that they completely believe the reasoning they gave- maybe at the time, maybe still, I can't say.

I've given some theories on why I think they reversed their stance on some board members. But that's all it is. Theory.

Until more information comes out, if it does, I choose to run with the HBG board believe decisions were made that they felt were not conducted with their proper input.

The question should be asked- if HBG were completely unreasonable in their decision, why would O'Farrell agree to come back, without his running mate as CEO who stood down because he felt HBG were unable to be worked with? Was there a conflict? Is there more going on than being reported?

My 'crusade'? I'm not going to harpoon HBG on half a story. Is that a crusade? Or is it just independent thinking?

I don't have to agree with the group narrative. It doesn't make me a "HBG stooge", a Wests Magpies supporter or some part of an agenda. At no point have I championed HBG. At no point have I ever agreed that I'm an 'old Magpies fan'.

Assumptions have run this entire thread.
You gaslight your wife like this?
 
There's 468 pages.

Pretty sure I've answered those questions in there.

It appears some posters are more interested in trying to belittle people than read though.
I'm not even going to respond with what I would have liked to say because you've started the "belittling", "bullying" victim show.

The fact you've gone down that route says enough.
 

Members online

Back
Top