The Chad
Well-known member
The Wests Tigers board of directors?Who oversaw all those people and appointments?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Wests Tigers board of directors?Who oversaw all those people and appointments?
Fair enough- was this before or after the radio stations started talking about it, taking calls, online articles coming out?Ink posted above that the media leak and video ammouncement were on the same day, so it rules this theory out.
I must misunderstand this statement, because surely you are not suggesting that fans were requesting to oust the independent board members?Maybe they felt responsible to explain to fans why they were changing it BECAUSE they were looking to change something largely driven by fan requests?
Maybe.
But your speculation & mine are neither more right or wrong.
This is why I keep saying- don't know.
What nobody (bar the Pro Magpies shills or whatever we are calling them today) wants to acknowledge is that HBG may have had a point. The fans are convinced that HBG is Emperor Palpatine & his cronies at work.
And that is fine. But it doesn't make it true.
From what I can see it was all on the same day. They would have hired someone to come and film the statement - its not like they had a media room to jump into an hour after the news broke. So it appears to be premeditated... not reactionary as suggested here.Fair enough- was this before or after the radio stations started talking about it, taking calls, online articles coming out?
Sorry mate- I brushed over something.Chad i admire your calmness in discussing things and your obviously more eloquent than they likes of me, however I sort of feel like your calling people out for speculating, but in a way your doing the same speculation, just throwing in the odd "no one knows" line to deflect away your point of view and opinion that you are pushing.
That is possible.From what I can see it was all on the same day. They would have hired someone to come and film the statement - its not like they had a media room to jump into an hour after the news broke. So it appears to be premeditated... not reactionary as suggested here.
Yeah, to a degree I agree.I feel sorry the champion old Magpie folk who have fully embraced the Wests Tigers and see just as clearly as the rest of us. They unfortunately may feel like they get put into the bracket you just described, but in reality, that bracket is a tiny minority who want to hurt the only thing our kids know. Shame on them
Sorry mate- I brushed over something.
I do call out people for speculating to a degree.
Speculate away- honestly.
It's what a forum should be for.
BUT.
Speculating & being adamant that the speculation is RIGHT is where I call it out.
We've had organised marches, people wanting to send back their memberships, demands for HBG board members to step down- but we have not heard the outcome of the HBG claims.
It's a terrible shame to hang someone as guilty only to find out years later they were not.
Sorry- not very clear.I must misunderstand this statement, because surely you are not suggesting that fans were requesting to oust the independent board members?
No mate- that is a perfectly reasonable take.You always seem to skip over the part where they had years being in control and failed. That is the most significant thing here. Thats the part where the negative speculation towards them comes in. That is not just fair enough and reasonable thinking, its human nature. Theres a reason the majority dont like HBG and its a minority defending them. Usually that tells you something. Its like watching your sister get cheated on, she takes him back with the promise of not doing it again...as a brother, its human nature to be negative to the guy that failed your sister and not trust him...why should we trust a group that has gone behind the fans back?
No mate- that is a perfectly reasonable take.
I think that then takes the conversation to what are success factors, and who is responsible for it?
My take- the team in 2025 improved. Not because of the board.
But because the right coach with the right players were doing things on the field.
If you take away on-field success & failure- how have HBG performed over the last decade or so? Did they stop funding Wests & Balmain juniors? Did the Leagues club run dry on money?
We want to argue that HBG & Wests Tigers boards are separate.
Ok.
Who hires the coach? HBG? Or Wests Tigers?
And you and others only know exactly the same as Chad as to the reasons for what went down. You and others keep making statements saying that they are fact with no evidence whatsoever but then get on your high horse and belittle others who do the same with a different view.Good old Chad doesnt know anything when defending HBG's actions but defends them consistently as the aggressors, but when it comes to Richardson and OFarrelll still doesn't know anything but comes up with a theory to discredit them.
Patronising bullshitI feel sorry the champion old Magpie folk who have fully embraced the Wests Tigers and see just as clearly as the rest of us. They unfortunately may feel like they get put into the bracket you just described, but in reality, that bracket is a tiny minority who want to hurt the only thing our kids know. Shame on them
Not fully.Ink posted above that the media leak and video ammouncement were on the same day, so it rules this theory out.
Lets talk facts then.And you and others only know exactly the same as Chad as to the reasons for what went down. You and others keep making statements saying that they are fact with no evidence whatsoever but then get on your high horse and belittle others who do the same with a different view.
Patronising bullshit
Everyone knows the outcome when HBG has been in total controlAnd you and others only know exactly the same as Chad as to the reasons for what went down. You and others keep making statements saying that they are fact with no evidence whatsoever but then get on your high horse and belittle others who do the same with a different view.
If that is the case, why did they say Richo had their full support.I don't know. Honestly- I've said this quite a lot- I don't know why they have done some of the things they have.
Tucker might have the right of it- more a PR exercise as they were getting roundly berated at the time.
Maybe they felt responsible to explain to fans why they were changing it BECAUSE they were looking to change something largely driven by fan requests?
What I will say is, despite taking O'Farrell back, at no point have HBG changed that statement/given a new one. So, on face value of it, they felt, as a group, that they were left out of significant financial decisions at a board level.
How that came about is open to speculation.
What I believe/suspect is- with the way HBG shifted gears on the board members post the Richardson resignation- having Richardson out of the club eased the situation.
Read into that what you like, but the two things together, combined with O'Farrell & Richardson signing off on the ground allocations.. I imagine this is the focal point.
If I was a betting man, my guess would be that HBG felt Richardson (and to a lesser degree O'Farrell/independent board members) was making decisions that HBG felt should have been run past them as the main financial partner of the Wests Tigers (not including grants etc).