How much money will we have to spend on the open market for 2018?

GNR4LIFE

Well-known member
Considering there's no one contracted beyond 2017, it appears the club will have a war chest with Farah gone, possibly the halves, Siro etc. The only player on our roster worth throwing any significant cash at would be the Camden kid. You could maybe make a case for Woods, but he's coasting on his reputation so far this yr.

So what are the predictions for what will be the amount we will have to play with? The whole cap? Half? And what players that are taking the field this week that you believe will still be at the club come 2018\. Imo the side will be unrecognisable.
 
10.9754 million dollars..

And will still sign Charlie Gubb..
 
In regards to the last question, the first graders I think we should keep are below. I'm tryng to be realistic, reward effort and keep in mind your top 25 has to include a fair few squad players like Lovett and Rankin who offer depth and professionalism.

Teddy
Simona
Rankin as a half, #14 or 1st drop
Possibly Moses but no at this stage
Sue
Woods
Grant
Ava
Lawrence
Controversial but I'd keep Lovett, he is improving and I've kept pretty much anyone who isn't incompetent and understands the word effort
Taylor, that is et not jt lol
Aloiai maybe
Felise looks good so far

From Reggies id be keeping mck, fine, hunt, jac and a few others like Edwards or griffin who need a stint in fg to see if they have it or not.

Most telling for me is the list of players I rated 6 weeks ago and now want gone asap. Top of the list nofo, kev, brooks, sirro and finally cherry, who went backwards this year.
 
We have some big decisions to make. A lot of our players have flaws in their game but who knows if the right coaching would fix that.

For instance Sue can be great but he comes up with the occasional dumb play can kill us. Lawrence has improved a lot but last week you saw him not moving up on the inside and we got busted out wide. Naiqama has been great but is rushing up in defence way too much and we are getting smashed on that side.

Going to the market is hit and miss as well. This year I think we've recruited really well but we haven't bought anyone who can really make a difference to our squad. We don't need though another Blair signing for instance.
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
I was waiting for Geo's one liner

You said yourself we have no player contracted past 2017…so....we have the entire Cap to spend in 2018..

Tedesco
Woods..

Clean slate......
 
I think Noffa is one that has to go. I've soured on him big time this yr. Has totally lost the plot.
 
We have the whole cap at this stage but Lawrence will probably be renegotiated into a 2018 or 2019 deal. My priorities at this stage would be:

Tedesco
Woods
Taylor
Sue
Ava
Moses (too hard to replace both)
Simona (if he needs to be moved to the wing then so be it)

Of the juniors I hope the following come on and demand re-signing:
Liddle
JJ Felise
Junior Tatola
Esan Marsters

And in a couple more years Papenhuyzen
 
The reality if that if we want big change, we need to make big changes. So plenty have to go…

I agree with keeping;
Tedesco
Woods
Taylor
Ava
Moses
Simona

I like the look of MCK and some of the young ones like JAC, Liddle, Felise will be worth hanging onto but too early to tell for sure yet.

A lot depends on who else we might secure which of course determines who we might need to hang onto. A good squad still needs toilers like Lovett and all-rounders like Rankin (just not on the damn wing!).

Most of all we need to invest in size. We've been too small right across the squad in various positions, for too many years.
 
@barra said:
Most of all we need to invest in size. We've been too small right across the squad in various positions, for too many years.

We have some decent forward size coming through the juniors like Felise, Tatola, Marsters and Paseka (120kg at age 18) but who knows how many of them will kick on. Felise looks likely but the rest are wait and see prospects.
 
@Nelson said:
@barra said:
Most of all we need to invest in size. We've been too small right across the squad in various positions, for too many years.

We have some decent forward size coming through the juniors like Felise, Tatola, Marsters and Paseka (120kg at age 18) but who knows how many of them will kick on. Felise looks likely but the rest are wait and see prospects.

Nelson in another thread FOX announces Paseka has been signed for two more years… so he's in the 2018 squad right now...
 
Id be concentrating on 2017 right now and trying to get that right first, imo id be letting either one of Brooks or Moses go preferably Brooks under this season's showing and trying to get Corey Norman in. Parra have only offered him $500 k give him the $600 k Brooks is supposed to get and build from there.

In saying that with our club thats pie in the sky stuff…
 
We could have all the money in the world to spend, but how are we going to attract a quality player to our club. Even paying massive overs we will struggle to attract the real quality we need.

I have a very long wish list, but no1 would be a big class centre and if they could goal kick that would be a bonus
 
@The_Doc said:
Id be concentrating on 2017 right now and trying to get that right first, imo id be letting either one of Brooks or Moses go preferably Brooks under this season's showing and trying to get Corey Norman in. Parra have only offered him $500 k give him the $600 k Brooks is supposed to get and build from there.

In saying that with our club thats pie in the sky stuff…

I think Norman will re-sign with Parra and I suspect he'll be getting more than $500K with them. He's worth more than that on the open market (probably more like $750K) and he would not come here of all places for only $600K…plus we can't just release Brooks when the option is in his favour. He wants it he can stay and there's nothing we can do about it (unless there's a performance clause in there).
 
@Nelson said:
@The_Doc said:
Id be concentrating on 2017 right now and trying to get that right first, imo id be letting either one of Brooks or Moses go preferably Brooks under this season's showing and trying to get Corey Norman in. Parra have only offered him $500 k give him the $600 k Brooks is supposed to get and build from there.

In saying that with our club thats pie in the sky stuff…

I think Norman will re-sign with Parra and I suspect he'll be getting more than $500K with them. He's worth more than that on the open market (probably more like $750K) and he would not come here of all places for only $600K…plus we can't just release Brooks when the option is in his favour. He wants it he can stay and there's nothing we can do about it (unless there's a performance clause in there).

Yeah i understand theres an option in both their favours, seen a few on twitter (yes I know) saying Brooks is as good as gone, they did report on the news Para's offer was in the region of $500k for Norman initially, and with all the scrutiny on them they may not have a great deal of room to move.
So IF Brooks does go or Moses id love us to have a crack at him $600k plus third party payments might not be out of the question considering the rumours about harry willing to kick in some 3rd party payments for players. Doesnt hurt to dream one day our club may actually pull its finger out and get it right.
 
@The_Doc said:
@Nelson said:
@The_Doc said:
Id be concentrating on 2017 right now and trying to get that right first, imo id be letting either one of Brooks or Moses go preferably Brooks under this season's showing and trying to get Corey Norman in. Parra have only offered him $500 k give him the $600 k Brooks is supposed to get and build from there.

In saying that with our club thats pie in the sky stuff…

I think Norman will re-sign with Parra and I suspect he'll be getting more than $500K with them. He's worth more than that on the open market (probably more like $750K) and he would not come here of all places for only $600K…plus we can't just release Brooks when the option is in his favour. He wants it he can stay and there's nothing we can do about it (unless there's a performance clause in there).

Yeah i understand theres an option in both their favours, seen a few on twitter (yes I know) saying Brooks is as good as gone, they did report on the news Para's offer was in the region of $500k for Norman initially, and with all the scrutiny on them they may not have a great deal of room to move.
So IF Brooks does go or Moses id love us to have a crack at him $600k plus third party payments might not be out of the question considering the rumours about harry willing to kick in some 3rd party payments for players. Doesnt hurt to dream one day our club may actually pull its finger out and get it right.

Haha fair enough, I'll leave you to your dreams and hope they come true :wink:
 
I'd say we should have more than half of our cap. Current firsts I'd keep…

Tedesco
Woods
Moses
Seumanufagai
Lawrence
Taylor

Current reggies I'd keep (despite them doing so well this year)

JAC

Current twenties

Liddle
Felise
Marsters
Papenhuyzen
Paseka
Suli

So we'd need 12 other players to fill out a first grade squad. I'd look between now and then at having signed 5 quality first graders and then depth from other WINNING clubs.
 
@The_Doc said:
Id be concentrating on 2017 right now and trying to get that right first, imo id be letting either one of Brooks or Moses go preferably Brooks under this season's showing and trying to get Corey Norman in. Parra have only offered him $500 k give him the $600 k Brooks is supposed to get and build from there.

In saying that with our club thats pie in the sky stuff…

Norman is asking Parramatta for at least 700k.
 
@Geo. said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
I was waiting for Geo's one liner

You said yourself we have no player contracted past 2017…so....we have the entire Cap to spend in 2018..

Tedesco
Woods..

Clean slate......

Only problem Geo, is that everyone elses, bank account will have the same amount as us to start.
I still think that all that will happen, is that players will cost more, and the good players will still go elsewhere, to where the TPAs ARE greener.

Players to some extent have more bargaining strength next year, as they know that most clubs are in the same boat, and dont have many signed. In a lot of cases this year it has been players who wanted to be off contract when the rise comes in , so they can cash in on the extra money
i cant see us being any better off , as far as costs are concerned, and well still have to pay overs in most cases.
Maybe Im wrong, but I dont see the extra money helping clubs any more, than the current money does now ,
 

Staff online

Back
Top