Humphreys and Skando disappointed with Campbelltown's crowd

@tiger4ever said:
What facts have i wrong…i know whos making an ass of himself....box of tissues maybe.

Well the fact we barely win at C-town for one. We've won 9 of our last 14 there
 
You people behave like children. And what is it with the strong Anti-Wests sentiment on this forum? I was warned by someone before coming on here and I have to say she was right.

Why do the moderators allow and in some cases help nurture hatred on this forum. Everybody should be pro Wests -Tigers. That means everything which is Wests Tigers. You people need to take a cold hard look at yourselves.
 
Personal attacks will not be tolerated on here, so keep it clean please people.
 
@hybrid_tiger said:
Blocker is an idiot.

There is no anti-Wests sentiment on here. There is a lot of Wests whingers though.

No I disagree. I have spent the last few days reading some of the old topics and there is a very heavy agenda on this forum and it is against Wests. Im only 22 so im not aligned to anyone but the Anti-Wests sentiment is extremely strong on here. I have not seen whingers just people arguing for fairness.

Why do you refer to them as Wests whingers? Aren't Wests the Wests Tigers ???
 
Back on topic please. This thread is about the crowd's at Campbelltown - Not the Wests Magpies or petty agendas.
 
@tiger4ever said:
lol…Yeah i have before but still always behind leichhardts average...

Always? Wrong.

When looking at crowds since inception, Campbelltown's rolling average since inception was higher than Leichhardt for the first 4 seasons of the merger. 2004 saw Leichhardt's rolling average since inception over take Campbelltown. Coincidentally, that is when Wests Tigers started to perform on the field….

The current average since inception for both grounds is 13,657 (L) and 13,056 (C).
 
Yeah there are far too many variables with comparisons like that when the figures are so even. If one averaged 18,000 and the other 10,000 there might be something in it. As it is they seem to be within a statistical deadheat that outside factors will influence individual outcomes.

Moving right along!
 
@Gary Bakerloo said:
@tiger4ever said:
lol…Yeah i have before but still always behind leichhardts average...

Always? Wrong.

When looking at crowds since inception, Campbelltown's rolling average since inception was higher than Leichhardt for the first 4 seasons of the merger. 2004 saw Leichhardt's rolling average since inception over take Campbelltown. Coincidentally, that is when Wests Tigers started to perform on the field….

The current average since inception for both grounds is 13,657 (L) and 13,056 (C).

Thanks for those figures Gary…... But unfortunately we'll be back here in a couple of weeks trying to prove the same point to the same people.
They'll never let it go.
 
@hybrid_tiger said:
Blocker is an idiot.

There is no anti-Wests sentiment on here. There is a lot of Wests whingers though.

There seems to be a lot of unreasonable whinging in this thread about crowd figures. And none of it is coming from 'Wests' like your alluding to. I guess its ok to whinge about stupid things like attracting 13, 000 when other Sydney teams lately can barely attract 10,000 when the shoe is on the other foot. Also the way a couple usual suspects came and hijacked the Magpie emblem thread resulting in it being locked proved that both sides are as good as each other at whinging about petty things. Anyway better stay on topic, i can't believe that a crowd of 13, 000 has attracted 8 pages of complaints, when its just about been the highest number Sydney crowd for the last month :crazy
 
@Yossarian said:
Yeah there are far too many variables with comparisons like that when the figures are so even. If one averaged 18,000 and the other 10,000 there might be something in it. As it is they seem to be within a statistical deadheat that outside factors will influence individual outcomes.

Moving right along!

Ed Zachary…

Rather than dwelling on a crowd that was still higher than the round average against a team that would have very little local representation, we should be looking at LO this weekend. If the weather is fine, there's no reason why that game should not sell out.

Potential eight wins on the trot, Sunday afternoon, another Sydney team in the Roosters looking at five losses. The stars are aligning for what should be a good game.

And finally, it's the responsibility of Wests Tigers fans in general to get to the games, not just the local populace who support the team!
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@hybrid_tiger said:
Blocker is an idiot.

There is no anti-Wests sentiment on here. There is a lot of Wests whingers though.

There seems to be a lot of unreasonable whinging in this thread about crowd figures. And none of it is coming from 'Wests' like your alluding to. I guess its ok to whinge about stupid things like attracting 13, 000 when other Sydney teams lately can barely attract 10,000 when the shoe is on the other foot. Also the way a couple usual suspects came and hijacked the Magpie emblem thread resulting in it being locked proved that both sides are as good as each other at whinging about petty things. Anyway better stay on topic, i can't believe that a crowd of 13, 000 has attracted 8 pages of complaints, when its just about been the highest number Sydney crowd for the last month :crazy

Exactly Right… Sydney doesnt deserve a team like the Tigers. The Club should be relocated to Queensland, renamed the East Coast Tigers :smiley: and play out of Lang Park. Minimum 30k people every game.

Get on to it Humpty!!!
 
@simonthetiger said:
Im sure it will draw more than 13k.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_

And who cares if it does? only people who get a kick out of some kind of bragging rights over the other. Its meaningless, the main thing is that day we won and made it 5 in a row, but you wouldn't think it going by this thread. Arguing about which ground gets better results and better crowds is like kids fighting over who has a better action figure.
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@simonthetiger said:
Im sure it will draw more than 13k.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_

And who cares if it does? only people who get a kick out of some kind of bragging rights over the other. Its meaningless, the main thing is that day we won and made it 5 in a row, but you wouldn't think it going by this thread. Arguing about which ground gets better results and better crowds is like kids fighting over who has a better action figure.

x2

Go Tigers
 
@Jackie Chiles said:
@hybrid_tiger said:
Blocker is an idiot.

There is no anti-Wests sentiment on here. There is a lot of Wests whingers though.

No I disagree. I have spent the last few days reading some of the old topics and there is a very heavy agenda on this forum and it is against Wests. Im only 22 so im not aligned to anyone but the Anti-Wests sentiment is extremely strong on here. I have not seen whingers just people arguing for fairness.

Why do you refer to them as Wests whingers? Aren't Wests the Wests Tigers ???

Sorry, I'll rephrase that then. Magpie whingers. That better?
 
Ok Ok Ok. Let's start a blue now. Is it not fair to say that what where Balmain's Tigers are now the Wests Tigers. But hey who's bitching.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
@tigermaniac said:
Ok Ok Ok. Let's start a blue now. Is it not fair to say that what where Balmain's Tigers are now the Wests Tigers. But hey who's [automatically edited].
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_

Start a blue? I don't even understand what you're saying!
 
@Yossarian said:
@tigermaniac said:
Ok Ok Ok. Let's start a blue now. Is it not fair to say that what where Balmain's Tigers are now the Wests Tigers. But hey who's [automatically edited].
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_

Start a blue? I don't even understand what you're saying!

Relax Yoss I was being a smart as$. Referring to ownership. Eg Mick's Ferrari is now my Ferrari.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
Back
Top