The Taylor thing and the Farah thing is very much like labor/liberal or holden/ford, there are people in both camps who would not swap sides no matter what happened. As I have said a million times,we just can not keep flicking coaches every time we have a bad season and we have to get behind our coaches and let them see out their contract and than make a call, but I also respect other people who have a totally different view…that is what a forum is all about
Coaches have a very small window these days to achieve success. I maintain if any coach is not successful in moving their team out of a bottom four position after a two, maximum three year period then the likelihood of them keeping their job is minimal. This does not apply just at our club. If Taylors results remain the same or even similar as this year, then the club may see out his contract but they would be very unlikely to renew it. As for Taylor/Farah - I have always been pro Farah but not anti Taylor. However Taylor has created a situation that has forced fans into another divisive situation which the club could have well done without. With no outcome insight I question his judgement, and his ability to critically reflect on his own performance.
I am a supporter of Farah as a player but not as a leader or captain. I am a fence sitter as far as Taylor is concerned. I have a few of my own theories about why he has coached the way he has, and I've posted those previously. However I believe the Farah/coach pattern has repeated itself too many times to be a coincidence. As a result, I am no longer a Farah supporter as far as Wests Tigers go.
In my view, your statement about Taylor forcing fans into a divisive situation is completely incorrect. In doing his job as coach, Taylor freed a player from his contractual obligations for reasons unknown to us. That player and his agent then made a big public sob story out of the situation whereas Taylor did his job and then stayed out of the media.
So the divisive situation that club could have done without was created by the same player that created a divisive situation that club could have done without last year. The same player that snuck away under a fence to escape public scrutiny of his actions.
The way I see it. Farah is a specialist hooker and nothing else. The timing allowed him very few options to secure a contract in a Sydney club, his preferred option, and why should he settle for anything less when he has a binding contract with the club he wants to play for? Until it was made known that he was not in Taylors plans moving forward, there was little or no controversy surrounding Farah this year. The talk was more about how the halves had not progressed under Taylor, and how Farah had taken a step back to allow them more control. If anything there was more criticism directed at Taylor for the so called Taylor Ball approach. As soon as the announcement was made the assumption immediately became that Farah was causing trouble, ( unfounded) and every failure that the club has endured over the past ten years is attributed to him by his detractors - the club is damage control again. Unless there is an outcome soon, Taylor is left with a big problem - one that he created.