If we need to make a halfback into a fullback, Miller is it

[MacDougall]

Seriously, the dude is just far more confident than Moltzen and that's what makes a fullback. Miller runs 100 miles an hour at the defense and seems to have every skill Moltzen has. If Sheens really wants to manufacture his fullback (I have no idea why?) then Miller is a better option that Moltzen. Yeah?

 

[Ayden]

Mitch Brown, Sean Meany and possibly Jake Mullaney should be the only players Sheens should consider to have fullback if Wade is out

 

[Demps]

Miller > Moltzen, Imo.
Iunno about full back though, If Wade is out I'd like…
Mitch Brown > Beau Ryan > Meany > Moltzen, last on the totem pole for sure.
He's been terrible the last few weeks.

 

[MacDougall]

Oh yeah I agree. But if Sheens needs his ball playing fullback, Miller has aggression and confidence that Moltzen doesn't have.

 

[Moh]

Please, Miller might have the agro but he is even smaller than Moltzen.

Mitch Brown has to be, HAS TO BE, fullback if McKinnon is out again.

 

[tiger05]

Forget it. Moltzen is learning how to play there and he is copping it left right and centre. Miller would be in the same boat.

We need a better fullback than McKinnon and Moltzen is the best player we have that might fill the role. I say give him a go. He was definitely better than most of our outside backs last night.

I still feel Moltzen is our best bet at fullback.

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

Miller is a halfback. Why would you ruin his development trying to utilize him as a fullback. That smacks of Blake Lazarus all over again.
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED

 

[alexaki]

Forget it. Moltzen is learning how to play there and he is copping it left right and centre. Miller would be in the same boat.

We need a better fullback than McKinnon and Moltzen is the best player we have that might fill the role. I say give him a go. He was definitely better than most of our outside backs last night.

**I still feel Moltzen is our best bet at fullback.**

Have you watched the last 2 games?

 

[innsaneink]

Miller is a halfback. Why would you ruin his development trying to utilize him as a fullback. That smacks of Blake Lazarus all over again.
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED

Agree.
Miller has a terrific passing game that would be wasted at fullback

 

[Geo]

Wow….how many halves do we want to stuff up...Miller slotted straight back in and NYC destroyed the high flying Broncos...

 

[magpiecol]

Forget it. Moltzen is learning how to play there and he is copping it left right and centre. Miller would be in the same boat.

We need a better fullback than McKinnon and Moltzen is the best player we have that might fill the role. I say give him a go. He was definitely better than most of our outside backs last night.

I still feel Moltzen is our best bet at fullback.

You have got to be kidding!!!!!

Ever heard of Jake Mullaney?

God help me. Some people do not have a clue.

 

[Tigerdave]

:bash

 

[happy_tiger]

What is wrong with our other 2 fullbacks Nackinnon and Brown

 

[Peaches]

Have people not read the topic title and his 1st post here?

He is saying he disagrees with having a half (Moltzen) at fullback but Sheens seems to want one there. He than says he thinks Jacob Miller is a better option than Moltzen at fullback if a half had to play in that position.

I agree here. Miller does seem to be a bit tougher than Moltzen and you can not play fullback if you have as many errors as Moltzen has had.

 

[Tigerdave]

no no I think everyone here read the post, but why try to convert yet another half to the fullback role when we have a perfectly fine back up in Brown?

 

[Peaches]

no no I think everyone here read the post, but why try to convert yet another half to the fullback role when we have a perfectly fine back up in Brown?

I agree with you. Brown is the man. I was calling for him to start from round 1 though those calls haven't been as loud since McKinnon picked up his form. The thread starter seems to believe that for some reason only known to Sheens, Sheens wants his fullback to ball-play, be a reliable passer or something like that.

 

[happy_tiger]

Have people not read the topic title and his 1st post here?

He is saying he disagrees with having a half (Moltzen) at fullback but Sheens seems to want one there. He than says he thinks Jacob Miller is a better option than Moltzen at fullback if a half had to play in that position.

I agree here. Miller does seem to be a bit tougher than Moltzen and you can not play fullback if you have as many errors as Moltzen has had.

But why would you do it ??? :unamused:

 

[innsaneink]

Have people not read the topic title and his 1st post here?

He is saying he disagrees with having a half (Moltzen) at fullback but Sheens seems to want one there. He than says he thinks Jacob Miller is a better option than Moltzen at fullback if a half had to play in that position.

I agree here. Miller does seem to be a bit tougher than Moltzen and you can not play fullback if you have as many errors as Moltzen has had.

But why would you do it ??? :unamused:

ego