@Strongee said in [JAC](/post/1258752) said:@Russell said in [JAC](/post/1258725) said:@Strongee said in [JAC](/post/1258634) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [JAC](/post/1258626) said:@Strongee said in [JAC](/post/1258435) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [JAC](/post/1258375) said:@Strongee said in [JAC](/post/1258358) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [JAC](/post/1258353) said:@Strongee said in [JAC](/post/1258350) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [JAC](/post/1258339) said:@Strongee said in [JAC](/post/1258259) said:@fibrodreaming said in [JAC](/post/1258130) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [JAC](/post/1258070) said:These so called ‘dirt hitups’ are a blight on rugby league. Wingers are being de-skilled. Give me a winger any day with the pace to be put into the clear and sprint 60 or. 70 metres to score. If you don’t have genuine pace you have no business being on the wing.
I agree. I speculated in an earlier post regarding Ken Irvine that as wingers have got bigger and stronger they have been sacrificing some pace in order to make the "dirty hit-ups".
Ken Irvine was only 5ft 8in and 78 kilos. He won a professional spring race over 100 yards in 9.3 seconds. Coincidentally Mike Cleary, who played for Souths in the 1960s, won a bronze in the Perth Commonwealth Games 100 yards timed at 9.3 seconds also.
It's hard to believe that with all the improvements in sports science and training methods over the past 60 years, no-one would get close to them today.
So I agree. The game is less of a spectacle with wingers doing the work of forwards, but most lacking the blistering pace of the old timers.
Dude ,that’s not true. It just seems it because they’re absolutely huge now. For the most part a lot of these guys are faster over shorter distances ,they just die really quickly .
I think the nostalgia fairy has sprinkled its dust on you . I watched games recently from the 80s , 90s , 00s early 10s and today .
And whilst the older games , had much more “action “, the general skill level was well below today’s game . It was extremely noticeable. From the way they pass , to offloading the ball with 2 hands , to the ball always hitting the deck , knock backs being actually called knock backs , so it lead to the call on the deck much more often .
The reality is , the wests tigers , would play the Aus team of the 90s and 80s , full of all those legends , and they would put 50 on them .
Just simple things like scooping the ball ip with 1 hand , no look passes , Backline plays , today are so crisp , they are played virtually at the defensive line . I watched the raiders of the 90s and all their moves were so predictable , and they played a lot of early ball. Long , slow build up . Hugely exciting innovative for the time . But not in 2020. The sheer size and power and speed of the average player is noticeable . People say guys like Nofa are slow . If he played back then he’d be the starting winger for the Aus team.
Larry Corowa, Russell Gartner and David Michael would all have carved up Nofoaluma. No doubt quite a few others.
Mate , that’s absolute rubbish ! The difference between 80s players and the ones today is astronomical. If your saying same skill, same era . Then who knows , but the advancements in technology and training full time alone , would make the gulf insurmountable
You forget, these players were far better athletes than Nofoaluma. All tall, all lightning quick and knowing how to read defence. These are capabilities Nofoaluma doesn't have in his kit bag. Remember there were no DVDs to tell you what to do, no robotic wingers,
I don’t forget at all . The reality is if you went into any of these clubs and had a look at all the metrics that would quantify who was a superior athlete , the difference between any athletic 70s player and 1 from current a NRL squad wouldn’t even be close . From strength to speed to agility to vertical leap , lateral movement . The only thing that may be close is sprint speed over 100m . But.most clubs don’t even look to develop that. It’s about over 10m and 40m.
Yes there were no modern training methods. Many drank and smoked on game day or at half time. But, the players I mentioned were superior athletes. Irvine was one of the finest of all time. His name lives on, see if Nofoaluma's does in 30 years.
That’s got nothing to do with anything . It’s basic science and evolution of sport . But yea a fast player from the 50s and 60s is a superior athlete to today , because he ran faster than everyone.
The eye test shows everything . Like I said watch games from 70s 80s 90s 00s 10s to day and you will notice the evolution of the athlete .
Nofoaluma is a superior athlete to any previous generation , mainly because he’s from the current generation and benefits from that .
All the rest is noise, rubbish and nostalgia , not bearing The remotest resemblance of fact .
Irvine, Gasnier, Langlands, Boustead, Corowa, Etinghausen all backs who will be remembered as being outstanding. All superior athletes and footballers.. There is no shame in it, it is reality.
I don’t understand what’s so hard about the fact , that the greatest athletes of all time , if your put them in a time machine , and had them compete today , would get absolutely hammered . Not because they’re not amazing freaks of nature , but because the kids today eat ,sleep , training and sports science .
Eg. The 1500m swim . Kieran Perkins was so good nobody would get anywhere near his 14. 49 I think was the time . Then grant hacket comes along and swims a 14.35 or something like that.
It was unheard of . Now in today’s racing if your not swimming 14.35 as a base time , you’re probably not even making the final .
It is the evolution of sport . I shouldn’t have had to explain this .
It seems fairly obvious to me .
You can't pull Ken Irvine, Reg Gasnier etc. out of the past put them in 2020 as say they would get creamed.
In your hypothetical scenario (which we all know is extreme daydreaming), if you were realistic in your daydream you would have to have the past players train like present players or present players working in a real job and only training two nights a week.
NOW..... if you did that I'd be with rare exceptions going for the "Old Guys."
What do you think would happen if you put a T-Rex in Martin Place this arvo? I think evolution would get a shake up right there.
Mate your over thinking it . It’s a simple equation “due to training techniques and evolution of sports science , todays players are better athletes “.
That’s it . There’s no nuance . It’s a statement based in fact . There’s multiple articles , documentaries , studies proving this .
The athletes of today are far superior , and it’s not even close
Ok, I will concede better athletes - not necessarily better players.