@OldMagpie said in [JAC](/post/1255587) said:I must be in the wrong place. Does anybody know where the JAC thread went ?
Maybe the 9 posts above you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@OldMagpie said in [JAC](/post/1255587) said:I must be in the wrong place. Does anybody know where the JAC thread went ?
@YesHeCheeKam said in [JAC](/post/1255593) said:@jrtiger said in [JAC](/post/1255544) said:@gallagher said in [JAC](/post/1255543) said:@Jedi_Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1255451) said:Our pack should be good next year
Easter Island Head
Garlick sauce
Blore
McIntyre
Garner
Luciano
Stefano
Twal
we look promising
Pretty much the same pack that got owned most weeks this year.
I think our pack improves next year. Stefano and Musgrove will add much needed impact off the bench. we should have a very dangerous back row pairing if Blore has a big preseason. Tamou will have one starting spot and Aloiai and Twal should build on what were good seasons this year. still missing a tearaway that will go to war with the opposition, but for the most part I think we're doing ok.
I think our starting pack improves. Something like:
8 Tamou
9 Liddle
10 Mikaele
11 Luciano
12 Garner
13 Twal
14 Stefano
15 Aloiai
16 Blore
17 Musgrove
Mcintyre, Seyfarth, Chee Kam and Packer as back ups. Its a solid pack but really lacking quality depth in the backrow once some injuries hit like they did this year. Think you may find one of those props move into the back row potentially. We are really 1-2 backrowers short, but have a host of props in Mikaele, Tamou, Steafno, Aloiai, Musgrove, Packer and Twal (Is ore a prop tbh).
@twentyforty said in [JAC](/post/1255698) said:The Andrew Webster article in the Herald yesterday was throwing a few stiff arms at Solly and Souths for not being able to hang onto Suaalii. Interestingly he claims the youngster was earmarked as Souths FB from 22. He goes onto explain it was the reason for Mitchell getting a one year contract. My question is, now they’re out of the race for Suaalii, do Souths still think there is a better FB in Addo-Carr available? Has the Mitchell experiment run it’s course?
@happy_tiger said in [JAC](/post/1255710) said:@YesHeCheeKam said in [JAC](/post/1255593) said:@jrtiger said in [JAC](/post/1255544) said:@gallagher said in [JAC](/post/1255543) said:@Jedi_Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1255451) said:Our pack should be good next year
Easter Island Head
Garlick sauce
Blore
McIntyre
Garner
Luciano
Stefano
Twal
we look promising
Pretty much the same pack that got owned most weeks this year.
I think our pack improves next year. Stefano and Musgrove will add much needed impact off the bench. we should have a very dangerous back row pairing if Blore has a big preseason. Tamou will have one starting spot and Aloiai and Twal should build on what were good seasons this year. still missing a tearaway that will go to war with the opposition, but for the most part I think we're doing ok.
I think our starting pack improves. Something like:
8 Tamou
9 Liddle
10 Mikaele
11 Luciano
12 Garner
13 Twal
14 Stefano
15 Aloiai
16 Blore
17 Musgrove
Mcintyre, Seyfarth, Chee Kam and Packer as back ups. Its a solid pack but really lacking quality depth in the backrow once some injuries hit like they did this year. Think you may find one of those props move into the back row potentially. We are really 1-2 backrowers short, but have a host of props in Mikaele, Tamou, Steafno, Aloiai, Musgrove, Packer and Twal (Is ore a prop tbh).
I'm not sure how anyone can get excited by our back row ....Lucy is doing a good job and probably gets a B ...no one else would get a C ...no matter how much potential they have shown
@mike said in [JAC](/post/1255699) said:@tiger05premier said in [JAC](/post/1255660) said:@insideman said in [JAC](/post/1251029) said:JAC will be announced after the Grand Final with the Tigers. Also Edene Gebbie is on our radar and I think he has agreed to join.
I take it your not so confident about this now?
It’s still after the Grand Final.
@tony-soprano said in [JAC](/post/1255737) said:Hoops saying dogs
@Rusty said in [JAC](/post/1255689) said:@Mighty_Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1255605) said:@frullens said in [JAC](/post/1255572) said:Re: JAC
Trent Barrett on Triple M today said it was a complicated one and didn't think it wo uuld be resolved anytime soon.
Didn't sound that confident.
Not sure how it's complicated when he can sign on for 2022 next week.
Surely things fall into place after that.
Its JAC... whoever he joins wants he wants then to sign him for next season not the one after. This means player swap has to happen. For that to happen the other player has to agree and has to be wanted by the Storm.
We can offer him a deal for 2022 but thats not what JAC wants. The storm also wouldn’t have an issue with him playing another year for them (they did it this year).
It’s not about money hence why it's complicated
Surely JAC has signed somewhere... The Storm is a professional outfit and will not be paying a player salary (from Nov 1) if he does intend to leave.
@Rusty said in [JAC](/post/1255689) said:@Mighty_Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1255605) said:@frullens said in [JAC](/post/1255572) said:Re: JAC
Trent Barrett on Triple M today said it was a complicated one and didn't think it wo uuld be resolved anytime soon.
Didn't sound that confident.
Not sure how it's complicated when he can sign on for 2022 next week.
Surely things fall into place after that.
Its JAC... whoever he joins wants he wants then to sign him for next season not the one after. This means player swap has to happen. For that to happen the other player has to agree and has to be wanted by the Storm.
We can offer him a deal for 2022 but thats not what JAC wants. The storm also wouldn’t have an issue with him playing another year for them (they did it this year).
It’s not about money hence why it's complicated
Surely JAC has signed somewhere... The Storm is a professional outfit and will not be paying a player salary (from Nov 1) if he does intend to leave.
@Earl said in [JAC](/post/1255718) said:@happy_tiger said in [JAC](/post/1255710) said:@YesHeCheeKam said in [JAC](/post/1255593) said:@jrtiger said in [JAC](/post/1255544) said:@gallagher said in [JAC](/post/1255543) said:@Jedi_Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1255451) said:Our pack should be good next year
Easter Island Head
Garlick sauce
Blore
McIntyre
Garner
Luciano
Stefano
Twal
we look promising
Pretty much the same pack that got owned most weeks this year.
I think our pack improves next year. Stefano and Musgrove will add much needed impact off the bench. we should have a very dangerous back row pairing if Blore has a big preseason. Tamou will have one starting spot and Aloiai and Twal should build on what were good seasons this year. still missing a tearaway that will go to war with the opposition, but for the most part I think we're doing ok.
I think our starting pack improves. Something like:
8 Tamou
9 Liddle
10 Mikaele
11 Luciano
12 Garner
13 Twal
14 Stefano
15 Aloiai
16 Blore
17 Musgrove
Mcintyre, Seyfarth, Chee Kam and Packer as back ups. Its a solid pack but really lacking quality depth in the backrow once some injuries hit like they did this year. Think you may find one of those props move into the back row potentially. We are really 1-2 backrowers short, but have a host of props in Mikaele, Tamou, Steafno, Aloiai, Musgrove, Packer and Twal (Is ore a prop tbh).
I'm not sure how anyone can get excited by our back row ....Lucy is doing a good job and probably gets a B ...no one else would get a C ...no matter how much potential they have shown
The reality is we need a lot of guys to step up next year. Some of them look likely but there aren't a lot of week in week out consistent performers. Aloiai and Lucy are our only two consistent performers. Eisenhuth was pretty consistent but he is going.
Then again Musgrove, Blore and even Twal may have much better seasons next year plus Tamou & Stefano may be good.
I suppose I like the look of the pack but a lot of guys have to prove themselves next year. It's unlikely a 4 or 5 of them improve significantly but I hope they do.
@balmain-boy said in [JAC](/post/1255745) said:getting what they want is more important than paying a couple weeks salary.
@Littlebittipsy said in [JAC](/post/1255754) said:https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/teams/storm/premiershipwinner-josh-addocarr-refuses-to-rule-out-a-return-to-melbourne-as-he-edges-closer-to-signing-with-a-sydney-club/news-story/cda51f498d34ef6e1929e5db513a1984
Gee, he doesn’t sound too committed to whoever he ends up with. Do we really want that?
@balmain-boy said in [JAC](/post/1255745) said:@Rusty said in [JAC](/post/1255689) said:@Mighty_Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1255605) said:@frullens said in [JAC](/post/1255572) said:Re: JAC
Trent Barrett on Triple M today said it was a complicated one and didn't think it wo uuld be resolved anytime soon.
Didn't sound that confident.
Not sure how it's complicated when he can sign on for 2022 next week.
Surely things fall into place after that.
Its JAC... whoever he joins wants he wants then to sign him for next season not the one after. This means player swap has to happen. For that to happen the other player has to agree and has to be wanted by the Storm.
We can offer him a deal for 2022 but thats not what JAC wants. The storm also wouldn’t have an issue with him playing another year for them (they did it this year).
It’s not about money hence why it's complicated
Surely JAC has signed somewhere... The Storm is a professional outfit and will not be paying a player salary (from Nov 1) if he does intend to leave.
That wouldn't come into it at all.
If they want a replacement, getting what they want is more important than paying a couple weeks salary. Our management was very weak for using this as a reason not to negotiate a swap for Matto.
@tiger05premier said in [JAC](/post/1255740) said:@tony-soprano said in [JAC](/post/1255737) said:Hoops saying dogs
That's what all the noise is now
@happy_tiger said in [JAC](/post/1255710) said:@YesHeCheeKam said in [JAC](/post/1255593) said:@jrtiger said in [JAC](/post/1255544) said:@gallagher said in [JAC](/post/1255543) said:@Jedi_Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1255451) said:Our pack should be good next year
Easter Island Head
Garlick sauce
Blore
McIntyre
Garner
Luciano
Stefano
Twal
we look promising
Pretty much the same pack that got owned most weeks this year.
I think our pack improves next year. Stefano and Musgrove will add much needed impact off the bench. we should have a very dangerous back row pairing if Blore has a big preseason. Tamou will have one starting spot and Aloiai and Twal should build on what were good seasons this year. still missing a tearaway that will go to war with the opposition, but for the most part I think we're doing ok.
I think our starting pack improves. Something like:
8 Tamou
9 Liddle
10 Mikaele
11 Luciano
12 Garner
13 Twal
14 Stefano
15 Aloiai
16 Blore
17 Musgrove
Mcintyre, Seyfarth, Chee Kam and Packer as back ups. Its a solid pack but really lacking quality depth in the backrow once some injuries hit like they did this year. Think you may find one of those props move into the back row potentially. We are really 1-2 backrowers short, but have a host of props in Mikaele, Tamou, Steafno, Aloiai, Musgrove, Packer and Twal (Is ore a prop tbh).
I'm not sure how anyone can get excited by our back row ....Lucy is doing a good job and probably gets a B ...no one else would get a C ...no matter how much potential they have shown
@cktiger said in [JAC](/post/1255746) said:@Earl said in [JAC](/post/1255718) said:@happy_tiger said in [JAC](/post/1255710) said:@YesHeCheeKam said in [JAC](/post/1255593) said:@jrtiger said in [JAC](/post/1255544) said:@gallagher said in [JAC](/post/1255543) said:@Jedi_Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1255451) said:Our pack should be good next year
Easter Island Head
Garlick sauce
Blore
McIntyre
Garner
Luciano
Stefano
Twal
we look promising
Pretty much the same pack that got owned most weeks this year.
I think our pack improves next year. Stefano and Musgrove will add much needed impact off the bench. we should have a very dangerous back row pairing if Blore has a big preseason. Tamou will have one starting spot and Aloiai and Twal should build on what were good seasons this year. still missing a tearaway that will go to war with the opposition, but for the most part I think we're doing ok.
I think our starting pack improves. Something like:
8 Tamou
9 Liddle
10 Mikaele
11 Luciano
12 Garner
13 Twal
14 Stefano
15 Aloiai
16 Blore
17 Musgrove
Mcintyre, Seyfarth, Chee Kam and Packer as back ups. Its a solid pack but really lacking quality depth in the backrow once some injuries hit like they did this year. Think you may find one of those props move into the back row potentially. We are really 1-2 backrowers short, but have a host of props in Mikaele, Tamou, Steafno, Aloiai, Musgrove, Packer and Twal (Is ore a prop tbh).
I'm not sure how anyone can get excited by our back row ....Lucy is doing a good job and probably gets a B ...no one else would get a C ...no matter how much potential they have shown
The reality is we need a lot of guys to step up next year. Some of them look likely but there aren't a lot of week in week out consistent performers. Aloiai and Lucy are our only two consistent performers. Eisenhuth was pretty consistent but he is going.
Then again Musgrove, Blore and even Twal may have much better seasons next year plus Tamou & Stefano may be good.
I suppose I like the look of the pack but a lot of guys have to prove themselves next year. It's unlikely a 4 or 5 of them improve significantly but I hope they do.
I don’t think Musgrove let us down in the few games he managed.
We’ll be better with him in the pack every week.
@Littlebittipsy said in [JAC](/post/1255754) said:https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/teams/storm/premiershipwinner-josh-addocarr-refuses-to-rule-out-a-return-to-melbourne-as-he-edges-closer-to-signing-with-a-sydney-club/news-story/cda51f498d34ef6e1929e5db513a1984
Gee, he doesn’t sound too committed to whoever he ends up with. Do we really want that?