@TYGA said in [JAC](/post/1255836) said:@Telltails said in [JAC](/post/1255835) said:@TYGA said in [JAC](/post/1255820) said:@Spida said in [JAC](/post/1255801) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [JAC](/post/1255796) said:If he does go to Dogs I would be curious as to why. We can seemingly offer him just as good money, maybe a little worse, but what’s swaying his decision? His past experiences at the club? Not a fan of Madge? Thinks our club is crap? We need to figure out why someone like him wouldn’t want to be here and fix it. The obvious answer is our results but problem is we can’t get results unless we sign better players ?
Money pure and simple.
Or
Bulldogs are selling him a bright future with the money they are prepared to spend to achieve premiership success. Their new sponsor is splashing cash.
We can sell the pics of a centre of excellence and juniors coming through. No instant success.will take time.
The word is Dogs have offered us DWZ heavily subsidised. Tigers won’t bite until Fox makes a call. Madge believes he can get back to a rep level fullback. It’s the smart play although he was bad last year.
Nah - he wasn't just bad last year he was embarrassing. He had one decent year at Penrith and thought he was better than he was. Hope they go no where near him especially if it allows them to fit JAC in their cap.
I’m not keen on it but I’m not keen on anyone unless it’s a young player that’s a gun or a rep player Not changing positions.
I'm all for going for JAC but I'm convinced he wont be coming back, so sure as hell don't want the discard to make that possible for the dogs. Much prefer investment in a young gun - let's hope we start to get the right one's.