Josh Reynolds

  • Thread starter Thread starter wokesmoke
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
@TheDaBoss said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113507) said:
Wasn't it reported during the season about how Josh lost his two twins......


Was that farce by her as well ?

Cause I felt preety bad for him at the time

I remember they said the twins were lost very late into the pregnancy, then they came out to speak their story for people in their situation.

I don’t know how she managed to keep it from him for that long
 
@Spartan117 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113521) said:
Please BE Careful to directly accuse eitjer party as this is before the courts.


This is reason enough to put a moratorium on the thread. I doubt there's anything anyone can say which adds to the factuality of the discussion because none of us were there. We'd be far better off waiting to hear what comes from today's court hearing.

Let's just hope it gets sorted swiftly and decisively.
 
@tony-soprano said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113384) said:
@Harvey said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113373) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113361) said:
@Earl said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113351) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

It doesn't work like this mate. They charge first and then let the legal system work it out. The problem is all the political correctness in society today impacts the legal system and we get situations like this.

It's plain wrong and hopefully a bunch of posters on here including yourself will learn a lesson not to judge people like Josh too harshly in these situations.

Women beaters aren't good people but neither are women that use the legal system to play games.

So the way he spoke to her is okay now?

How would you speak to someone if you had just found out you had been scammed for several thousand dollars, had falsely led you through the emotions of believing you were about to become a parent, only to crush that when they could no longer substantiate their lies. Someone that you had broken up with and asked to leave, only for them to keep hanging around looking to bait you for one last pay day.

You would have to be the most intelligent and emotionless person to not have an explosive reaction.

Would rather not use the c word.

I call my best mate a c word.

If someone has their whole life thrown into turmoil based on sociopathic lies, you have the right to use as many c words as you wish.
 
@Moh said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113484) said:
Happy this has all come out now, obvious there was more to it but didn't stop some people with wild accusations.

Nice one smokey, yet again proving you're all class.

What are u on about peanut? I said there was a concerning video of JR about to drop before any of you had a clue about it. Regardless of the character of this woman, all that’s been said yesterday has nothing to do with the incident that happened that night he has been charged for. And it sure doesn’t warrant any assault on her that may have occurred that he’s been charged with. And if you think it does, then you really shouldn’t comment on the “class” of someone moh.
 
@JD-Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113471) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113389) said:
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113386) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113374) said:
Well there is now more to this story, based on evidence.

There was no evidence provided in that story for either side! Everything in that story were allegations and claims of having evidence!

@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113374) said:
but she’s just lost a whole lot of credibility…

She most definitely has!

I’d say her parents are a primary source! But hey maybe 6 ex partners and her own family have banded together and are all out to get her for no reason.

Just had a weird thought. If Josh currently played for the Roosters or the Storm, I wonder how many people would think that these 6 people and the family were paid off by those clubs. I admit, the thought would cross my mind.

Im not saying WT would do that. But if it were Benji we might consider something like that, its not totally unfathomable.

Spot on. If some opinions aren’t being swayed by he’s one of our own players, then i’m an Arabian Princess. I’d like to hear opinion if it were Cam Smith or Darius Boyd. As if Mitchell Moses would have sympathy.
 
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113530) said:
@Moh said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113484) said:
Happy this has all come out now, obvious there was more to it but didn't stop some people with wild accusations.

Nice one smokey, yet again proving you're all class.

What are u on about peanut? I said there was a concerning video of JR about to drop before any of you had a clue about it. Regardless of the character of this woman, all that’s been said yesterday has nothing to do with the incident that happened that night he has been charged for. And it sure doesn’t warrant any assault on her that may have occurred that he’s been charged with. And if you think it does, then you really shouldn’t comment on the “class” of someones moh.

Hang on, you swore up and down you weren’t SG. I guess once someone appeals to your vanity, you have to give up the charade to defend yourself.
 
@GNR4LIFE said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113534) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113530) said:
@Moh said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113484) said:
Happy this has all come out now, obvious there was more to it but didn't stop some people with wild accusations.

Nice one smokey, yet again proving you're all class.

What are u on about peanut? I said there was a concerning video of JR about to drop before any of you had a clue about it. Regardless of the character of this woman, all that’s been said yesterday has nothing to do with the incident that happened that night he has been charged for. And it sure doesn’t warrant any assault on her that may have occurred that he’s been charged with. And if you think it does, then you really shouldn’t comment on the “class” of someones moh.

Hang on, you swore up and down you weren’t SG. I guess once someone appeals to your vanity, you have to give up the charade to defend yourself.

Lost me.
 
Say for instance this female has actively tried to get Reynolds arrested/ruin his life etc and it all came out in that conversation that she recorded and heaven forbid he laid his hand on her.....would he still be seen as the worst guy ever for laying his hands on her even though she did her best to screw his life up?

I don't for one minute condone violence.....but it is an interesting conversation....did the alleged abuse towards Reynolds trigger him? Would he have done it if he wasn't allegedly so clinically and callously duped?

Just trying to promote conversation.....
 
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113541) said:
Say for instance this female has actively tried to get Reynolds arrested/ruin his life etc and it all came out in that conversation that she recorded and heaven forbid he laid his hand on her.....would he still be seen as the worst guy ever for laying his hands on her even though she did her best to screw his life up?

I don't for one minute condone violence.....but it is an interesting conversation....did the alleged abuse towards Reynolds trigger him? Would he have done it if he wasn't allegedly so clinically and callously duped?

Just trying to promote conversation.....

Would rather the conversation killed off tbh....
 
@tigerap said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113544) said:
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113541) said:
Say for instance this female has actively tried to get Reynolds arrested/ruin his life etc and it all came out in that conversation that she recorded and heaven forbid he laid his hand on her.....would he still be seen as the worst guy ever for laying his hands on her even though she did her best to screw his life up?

I don't for one minute condone violence.....but it is an interesting conversation....did the alleged abuse towards Reynolds trigger him? Would he have done it if he wasn't allegedly so clinically and callously duped?

Just trying to promote conversation.....

Would rather the conversation killed off tbh....

Hopefully it will be killed of in the courts today if a third of what has been revealed is true ...credibility what credibility!
 
I know Reynolds is in court today, I thought it was to try push his actual trial forward but I’ve seen people saying he’s calling witnesses today? I’m confused, is it his actual court case today or is he just trying to push it forward
 
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113541) said:
Say for instance this female has actively tried to get Reynolds arrested/ruin his life etc and it all came out in that conversation that she recorded and heaven forbid he laid his hand on her.....would he still be seen as the worst guy ever for laying his hands on her even though she did her best to screw his life up?

I don't for one minute condone violence.....but it is an interesting conversation....did the alleged abuse towards Reynolds trigger him? Would he have done it if he wasn't allegedly so clinically and callously duped?

Just trying to promote conversation.....

I personally don’t wish to promote conversation on a subject matter which is under police investigation and currently before the courts. However, you do raise an interesting point. Seems these days we have two justice systems . When Josh has had his day in court he will then Face the court of public opinion. With very little evidence and limited or nil access to witness questioning many will form an opinion based on personal bias and media headlines often carrying a different agenda.
As a famous scientist once said.. why is it so?
And as a humble forum poster replied.. because people love the drama in the lives of others.
 
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113541) said:
Say for instance this female has actively tried to get Reynolds arrested/ruin his life etc and it all came out in that conversation that she recorded and heaven forbid he laid his hand on her.....would he still be seen as the worst guy ever for laying his hands on her even though she did her best to screw his life up?

I don't for one minute condone violence.....but it is an interesting conversation....did the alleged abuse towards Reynolds trigger him? Would he have done it if he wasn't allegedly so clinically and callously duped?

Just trying to promote conversation.....

As I said earlier,how much can a man take,Josh wanted her out of his life and she seemed to goad him,to video him is another act that's pretty low while having a domestic dispute...set up and ready to ruin his life I would say...
I hope the truth comes out very soon one way or the other,speculating only fuels arguments....
 
Thread re-opened. What could go wrong?

Anyway, if it's all true I'm pleased for Josh and I'm glad I didn't delete the shirtless pic of me and the kids with him lol
 
Lots of victim blaming in here since last night. Just to clarify assaulting a woman is justified because her character is bad and she lied about stuff... got it.
 
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113564) said:
Lots of victim blaming in here since last night. Just to clarify assaulting a woman is justified because her character is bad and she lied about stuff... got it.

Doubling down I see.
 
Sounds like JR's legal team are trying to pressure the complainant to drop the charges or at least come to some out of court settlement before the footy season starts.
 
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113564) said:
Lots of victim blaming in here since last night. Just to clarify assaulting a woman is justified because her character is bad and she lied about stuff... got it.

:face_with_rolling_eyes:

I went back over the thread. I don't think anyone said it's ok to assault a woman. Since all we have seen so far is Josh getting angry and swearing I'd say that if the allegations about her are true then his anger has at least been put into perspective.
 
@Papacito said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113566) said:
Sounds like JR's legal team are trying to pressure the complainant to drop the charges or at least come to some out of court settlement before the footy season starts.

Agree
It’ll cost him a packet but it should be sorted soon I reckon
 
@Cultured_Bogan said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113565) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113564) said:
Lots of victim blaming in here since last night. Just to clarify assaulting a woman is justified because her character is bad and she lied about stuff... got it.

Doubling down I see.

He turned himself and was still charged. Regardless of what you may think of the woman, the results of that night had nothing to do with the story from yesterday. And as I said, regardless, putting your hands on a female and being highly aggressive isn’t warranted. And if you condone it and agree it’s justified then I feel sorry for your missus and daughters if you have any
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top