G
Guest
Guest
Let's keep it on topic please, people are wandering again.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@tigerballs said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114714) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114687) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114680) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114676) said:Witness account reported by the Illawarra Mercury but not it appears major outlets.
"The women with the players had all walked off beforehand and they were all cursing on the way out of the door saying 'He does this all the time,'" he said.
????Context?
My bad. Northies incident 2018 abusing a female staff member and other staff. Interestingly, the Illawarra Mercury includes eye witness accounts other papers don't seem
https://www.illawarramercury.com.au/story/4809756/leagues-3m-man-to-face-court-over-alleged-drunken-incident/?cs=2452o
Wasn't this found to be fake news?
@Ponyo said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114732) said:Comments deleted w/o reason
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114717) said:Let's keep it on topic please, people are wandering again.
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114684) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114683) said:@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114674) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114663) said:@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114626) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113595) said:@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113541) said:Say for instance this female has actively tried to get Reynolds arrested/ruin his life etc and it all came out in that conversation that she recorded and heaven forbid he laid his hand on her.....***would he still be seen as the worst guy ever for laying his hands on her*** even though she did her best to screw his life up?
***I don't for one minute condone violence***.....but it is an interesting conversation....did the alleged abuse towards Reynolds trigger him? Would he have done it if he wasn't allegedly so clinically and callously duped?
Just trying to promote conversation.....
A real man would not lay a hand on a woman for any reason or any provocation. There is zero excuse for it, ever, full stop. A weak man assaults a woman, regardless of provocation.
to answer your question, if what this girl has supposedly done could trigger JR to assault her, I guess yes if JR is a weak man and there is no excuse for it.
SMH at what this thread has opened up. Between this thread and the coronavirus thread, we have had a whole new look at our fellow fans.
You ever been spat on by a woman? Assaulted by one through kicking and punching? Had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you by a woman? had a knife pulled on you by a woman? That happens you just going to stand there and use your words?
Have you actually had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you? Not disputing it but would love to know the circumstances surrounding it!
yes I have and it was highly unpleasant....as well as being spat at, had faeces and vomit thrown......
work related hazards......prison system is a wonderful melting pot. The women had a problem with their current situations after being bail refused and took it out on their nearest correctional officer
Crikey, sounds awful. I think faeces is the worst. If someone chucked their actual poo at me it would take me quite a while to get over it.
It's all well and good to have standards about not hitting women....domestic violence is the worst.....but sometimes people act like absolute animals and you need to protect yourself. Think I'm gonna stand there while some female throws her used feminine hygiene products at me??? Think again
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114525) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114524) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114521) said:@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114518) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114516) said:@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114512) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114507) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114503) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114502) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114501) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114499) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114497) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114492) said:So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.
I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.
The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart
That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.
That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.
Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.
I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident
It is relevant to the night of the incident because it casts doubt over whether the night of the incident existed to begin with.
Literally a video, or is that fake as well
That isn’t a video of the incident. Is he being charged for yelling and swearing?
That’s not the entire video released.
Personally Ive never really cared about you making stuff up wrt signings as I find it humourous and entertaining.
you pretending to know more than you do about this case however is not cool and dangerous when peoples reputations are at stake.
You do not know for fact that its the same night or video, I also doubt you have read the police sheets (point us to where they are available.)
Pays to have friends in that industry
@Ponyo said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114755) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114525) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114524) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114521) said:@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114518) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114516) said:@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114512) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114507) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114503) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114502) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114501) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114499) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114497) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114492) said:So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.
I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.
The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart
That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.
That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.
Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.
I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident
It is relevant to the night of the incident because it casts doubt over whether the night of the incident existed to begin with.
Literally a video, or is that fake as well
That isn’t a video of the incident. Is he being charged for yelling and swearing?
That’s not the entire video released.
Personally Ive never really cared about you making stuff up wrt signings as I find it humourous and entertaining.
you pretending to know more than you do about this case however is not cool and dangerous when peoples reputations are at stake.
You do not know for fact that its the same night or video, I also doubt you have read the police sheets (point us to where they are available.)
Pays to have friends in that industry
One of your best brother
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114767) said:@Ponyo said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114755) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114525) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114524) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114521) said:@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114518) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114516) said:@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114512) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114507) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114503) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114502) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114501) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114499) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114497) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114492) said:So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.
I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.
The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart
That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.
That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.
Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.
I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident
It is relevant to the night of the incident because it casts doubt over whether the night of the incident existed to begin with.
Literally a video, or is that fake as well
That isn’t a video of the incident. Is he being charged for yelling and swearing?
That’s not the entire video released.
Personally Ive never really cared about you making stuff up wrt signings as I find it humourous and entertaining.
you pretending to know more than you do about this case however is not cool and dangerous when peoples reputations are at stake.
You do not know for fact that its the same night or video, I also doubt you have read the police sheets (point us to where they are available.)
Pays to have friends in that industry
One of your best brother
And as it would happen one of his last.
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114767) said:@Ponyo said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114755) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114525) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114524) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114521) said:@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114518) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114516) said:@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114512) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114507) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114503) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114502) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114501) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114499) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114497) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114492) said:So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.
I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.
The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart
That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.
That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.
Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.
I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident
It is relevant to the night of the incident because it casts doubt over whether the night of the incident existed to begin with.
Literally a video, or is that fake as well
That isn’t a video of the incident. Is he being charged for yelling and swearing?
That’s not the entire video released.
Personally Ive never really cared about you making stuff up wrt signings as I find it humourous and entertaining.
you pretending to know more than you do about this case however is not cool and dangerous when peoples reputations are at stake.
You do not know for fact that its the same night or video, I also doubt you have read the police sheets (point us to where they are available.)
Pays to have friends in that industry
One of your best brother
And as it would happen one of his last.
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114684) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114683) said:@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114674) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114663) said:@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114626) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113595) said:@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113541) said:Say for instance this female has actively tried to get Reynolds arrested/ruin his life etc and it all came out in that conversation that she recorded and heaven forbid he laid his hand on her.....***would he still be seen as the worst guy ever for laying his hands on her*** even though she did her best to screw his life up?
***I don't for one minute condone violence***.....but it is an interesting conversation....did the alleged abuse towards Reynolds trigger him? Would he have done it if he wasn't allegedly so clinically and callously duped?
Just trying to promote conversation.....
A real man would not lay a hand on a woman for any reason or any provocation. There is zero excuse for it, ever, full stop. A weak man assaults a woman, regardless of provocation.
to answer your question, if what this girl has supposedly done could trigger JR to assault her, I guess yes if JR is a weak man and there is no excuse for it.
SMH at what this thread has opened up. Between this thread and the coronavirus thread, we have had a whole new look at our fellow fans.
You ever been spat on by a woman? Assaulted by one through kicking and punching? Had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you by a woman? had a knife pulled on you by a woman? That happens you just going to stand there and use your words?
Have you actually had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you? Not disputing it but would love to know the circumstances surrounding it!
yes I have and it was highly unpleasant....as well as being spat at, had faeces and vomit thrown......
work related hazards......prison system is a wonderful melting pot. The women had a problem with their current situations after being bail refused and took it out on their nearest correctional officer
Crikey, sounds awful. I think faeces is the worst. If someone chucked their actual poo at me it would take me quite a while to get over it.
It's all well and good to have standards about not hitting women....domestic violence is the worst.....but sometimes people act like absolute animals and you need to protect yourself. Think I'm gonna stand there while some female throws her used feminine hygiene products at me??? Think again
@4jtigers said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114770) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114767) said:@Ponyo said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114755) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114525) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114524) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114521) said:@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114518) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114516) said:@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114512) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114507) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114503) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114502) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114501) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114499) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114497) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114492) said:So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.
I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.
The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart
That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.
That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.
Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.
I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident
It is relevant to the night of the incident because it casts doubt over whether the night of the incident existed to begin with.
Literally a video, or is that fake as well
That isn’t a video of the incident. Is he being charged for yelling and swearing?
That’s not the entire video released.
Personally Ive never really cared about you making stuff up wrt signings as I find it humourous and entertaining.
you pretending to know more than you do about this case however is not cool and dangerous when peoples reputations are at stake.
You do not know for fact that its the same night or video, I also doubt you have read the police sheets (point us to where they are available.)
Pays to have friends in that industry
One of your best brother
And as it would happen one of his last.
thank you, I couldn't stand him and his over the top comments but I just read and ignore
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114626) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113595) said:@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113541) said:Say for instance this female has actively tried to get Reynolds arrested/ruin his life etc and it all came out in that conversation that she recorded and heaven forbid he laid his hand on her.....***would he still be seen as the worst guy ever for laying his hands on her*** even though she did her best to screw his life up?
***I don't for one minute condone violence***.....but it is an interesting conversation....did the alleged abuse towards Reynolds trigger him? Would he have done it if he wasn't allegedly so clinically and callously duped?
Just trying to promote conversation.....
A real man would not lay a hand on a woman for any reason or any provocation. There is zero excuse for it, ever, full stop. A weak man assaults a woman, regardless of provocation.
to answer your question, if what this girl has supposedly done could trigger JR to assault her, I guess yes if JR is a weak man and there is no excuse for it.
SMH at what this thread has opened up. Between this thread and the coronavirus thread, we have had a whole new look at our fellow fans.
You ever been spat on by a woman? Assaulted by one through kicking and punching? Had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you by a woman? had a knife pulled on you by a woman? That happens you just going to stand there and use your words?
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114822) said:I just picked up in another forum, Bella is a busy girl.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4972330/Richmond-scandal-Woman-dragged-topless-row-speaks.html
@TCL said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114791) said:More aliases than Donna Preusker - or could it be................................
@TieDye said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114825) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114822) said:I just picked up in another forum, Bella is a busy girl.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4972330/Richmond-scandal-Woman-dragged-topless-row-speaks.html
Some bird eh?