Josh Reynolds

  • Thread starter Thread starter wokesmoke
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114579) said:
@tigerballs said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114575) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114573) said:
@Tiger_Steve said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114565) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114550) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114536) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114530) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114515) said:
@JoshColeman99 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114510) said:
The video doesn’t prove anything. While yelling at her like that isn’t a good look he doesn’t touch her and it’s right after she busted into his house so obviously he’ll be angry. Nothing in it I think.

I don’t even know where to start with this. But hopefully you don’t have a missus or a daughter if you think that this is a normal way to interact

Mate , you keep saying this and no one replied because people do have daughters. And if my daughter has done what this girl has done and the worst thing that happened is him swear at her , and tell her to gtfo , Then I would consider that a lucky escape .
You sound like a huge snowflake. If that language is enough for you to drop your bundle than I don't know what to say.
This , even at its worst , is a bruised arm and a few bad words and hurt feelings . Now the fact that her whole accusation has question marks , throws the whole thing into question .
Yet you still double down on some , weird notion of chivalry.


If you were dating my daughter Or mother or sister (theoretically) and u called her a C word and threatened to assault her, Id chin you.

Lol really ? I'd like to see you try.That's absolutely ridiculous.
A. Thier relationship is none of your business, unless abuse is involved.
B. Especially with the type of language used in Aus (eg. A C bomb can be used as a term of endearment ), having a fight where that type of language is used , considering the circumstances, most reasonable people would say , yea fair enough.
C. Anybody who would openly threaten to belt someone, without considering the whole context , based on a short video , is a joke. I believe you would try to put one on my chin , but find that's about all you would be doing .
Your a joke.

Talks big on an anonymous forum. Real tough guy

Meh. I just find the hypocrisy ridiculous. He's saying he's against violence by saying he's going to enact violence for revenge . I get his point of view , just comes across as an idealism we all had when we were 18. Until we all had arguments , where you're called everything and even had things thrown at you, and your idealism starts to be replaced by reality . He's clearly never had a psycho the ex girlfriend .

I once saw a girl sneak up behind a bouncer who was taking a bloke outside and belt him in the back of the head with her high heels. Opened him up. He swung round and put one right on her bean. It wasn't nice but everyone at the time thought "yeah, fair enough".

That's not ok . I was talking about words . Their just sounds , really , said with emotion behind them . The gravity and credence you give them is entirely up to you . Are you implying that king hitting a chick is the same as telling her to GTFO?

I'm just saying sometimes you get a little bit more than you ask for. Human beings being human beings, who knows how anyone is going to react in any given situation. Some people go their whole lives and somehow never have any trouble and others seem to be able to find it daily. You go round teasing enough dogs eventually one's going to bite you, how hard is up to the dog.
 
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114580) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114578) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114573) said:
@Tiger_Steve said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114565) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114550) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114536) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114530) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114515) said:
@JoshColeman99 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114510) said:
The video doesn’t prove anything. While yelling at her like that isn’t a good look he doesn’t touch her and it’s right after she busted into his house so obviously he’ll be angry. Nothing in it I think.

I don’t even know where to start with this. But hopefully you don’t have a missus or a daughter if you think that this is a normal way to interact

Mate , you keep saying this and no one replied because people do have daughters. And if my daughter has done what this girl has done and the worst thing that happened is him swear at her , and tell her to gtfo , Then I would consider that a lucky escape .
You sound like a huge snowflake. If that language is enough for you to drop your bundle than I don't know what to say.
This , even at its worst , is a bruised arm and a few bad words and hurt feelings . Now the fact that her whole accusation has question marks , throws the whole thing into question .
Yet you still double down on some , weird notion of chivalry.


If you were dating my daughter Or mother or sister (theoretically) and u called her a C word and threatened to assault her, Id chin you.

Lol really ? I'd like to see you try.That's absolutely ridiculous.
A. Thier relationship is none of your business, unless abuse is involved.
B. Especially with the type of language used in Aus (eg. A C bomb can be used as a term of endearment ), having a fight where that type of language is used , considering the circumstances, most reasonable people would say , yea fair enough.
C. Anybody who would openly threaten to belt someone, without considering the whole context , based on a short video , is a joke. I believe you would try to put one on my chin , but find that's about all you would be doing .
Your a joke.

Talks big on an anonymous forum. Real tough guy

Meh. I just find the hypocrisy ridiculous. He's saying he's against violence by saying he's going to enact violence for revenge . I get his point of view , just comes across as an idealism we all had when we were 18. Until we all had arguments , where you're called everything and even had things thrown at you, and your idealism starts to be replaced by reality . He's clearly never had a psycho the ex girlfriend .

What about the ex partner's legal representatives investigating if pics were sent from JR's mobile phone around the time that video was filmed?

Sorry I don't understand your point ?

While she has been portrayed in a certain light, her actions (at the time the video was filmed) could be viewed as being consistent with a spouse believing an (alleged) infidelity had occurred..
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114585) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114580) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114578) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114573) said:
@Tiger_Steve said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114565) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114550) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114536) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114530) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114515) said:
@JoshColeman99 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114510) said:
The video doesn’t prove anything. While yelling at her like that isn’t a good look he doesn’t touch her and it’s right after she busted into his house so obviously he’ll be angry. Nothing in it I think.

I don’t even know where to start with this. But hopefully you don’t have a missus or a daughter if you think that this is a normal way to interact

Mate , you keep saying this and no one replied because people do have daughters. And if my daughter has done what this girl has done and the worst thing that happened is him swear at her , and tell her to gtfo , Then I would consider that a lucky escape .
You sound like a huge snowflake. If that language is enough for you to drop your bundle than I don't know what to say.
This , even at its worst , is a bruised arm and a few bad words and hurt feelings . Now the fact that her whole accusation has question marks , throws the whole thing into question .
Yet you still double down on some , weird notion of chivalry.


If you were dating my daughter Or mother or sister (theoretically) and u called her a C word and threatened to assault her, Id chin you.

Lol really ? I'd like to see you try.That's absolutely ridiculous.
A. Thier relationship is none of your business, unless abuse is involved.
B. Especially with the type of language used in Aus (eg. A C bomb can be used as a term of endearment ), having a fight where that type of language is used , considering the circumstances, most reasonable people would say , yea fair enough.
C. Anybody who would openly threaten to belt someone, without considering the whole context , based on a short video , is a joke. I believe you would try to put one on my chin , but find that's about all you would be doing .
Your a joke.

Talks big on an anonymous forum. Real tough guy

Meh. I just find the hypocrisy ridiculous. He's saying he's against violence by saying he's going to enact violence for revenge . I get his point of view , just comes across as an idealism we all had when we were 18. Until we all had arguments , where you're called everything and even had things thrown at you, and your idealism starts to be replaced by reality . He's clearly never had a psycho the ex girlfriend .

What about the ex partner's legal representatives investigating if pics were sent from JR's mobile phone around the time that video was filmed?

Sorry I don't understand your point ?

While she has been portrayed in a certain light, her actions (at the time the video was filmed) could be viewed as being consistent with a spouse believing an (alleged) infidelity had occurred..


Yea maybe. I was commenting on how domestic violence is a spider's web. And sometimes not all , it's not what it seems . So for someone to make such grandiose threats , and take such a black and white view seems childish to me. And shows a lack of life experience , more than anything .
 
@tigerballs said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114583) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114579) said:
@tigerballs said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114575) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114573) said:
@Tiger_Steve said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114565) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114550) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114536) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114530) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114515) said:
@JoshColeman99 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114510) said:
The video doesn’t prove anything. While yelling at her like that isn’t a good look he doesn’t touch her and it’s right after she busted into his house so obviously he’ll be angry. Nothing in it I think.

I don’t even know where to start with this. But hopefully you don’t have a missus or a daughter if you think that this is a normal way to interact

Mate , you keep saying this and no one replied because people do have daughters. And if my daughter has done what this girl has done and the worst thing that happened is him swear at her , and tell her to gtfo , Then I would consider that a lucky escape .
You sound like a huge snowflake. If that language is enough for you to drop your bundle than I don't know what to say.
This , even at its worst , is a bruised arm and a few bad words and hurt feelings . Now the fact that her whole accusation has question marks , throws the whole thing into question .
Yet you still double down on some , weird notion of chivalry.


If you were dating my daughter Or mother or sister (theoretically) and u called her a C word and threatened to assault her, Id chin you.

Lol really ? I'd like to see you try.That's absolutely ridiculous.
A. Thier relationship is none of your business, unless abuse is involved.
B. Especially with the type of language used in Aus (eg. A C bomb can be used as a term of endearment ), having a fight where that type of language is used , considering the circumstances, most reasonable people would say , yea fair enough.
C. Anybody who would openly threaten to belt someone, without considering the whole context , based on a short video , is a joke. I believe you would try to put one on my chin , but find that's about all you would be doing .
Your a joke.

Talks big on an anonymous forum. Real tough guy

Meh. I just find the hypocrisy ridiculous. He's saying he's against violence by saying he's going to enact violence for revenge . I get his point of view , just comes across as an idealism we all had when we were 18. Until we all had arguments , where you're called everything and even had things thrown at you, and your idealism starts to be replaced by reality . He's clearly never had a psycho the ex girlfriend .

I once saw a girl sneak up behind a bouncer who was taking a bloke outside and belt him in the back of the head with her high heels. Opened him up. He swung round and put one right on her bean. It wasn't nice but everyone at the time thought "yeah, fair enough".

That's not ok . I was talking about words . Their just sounds , really , said with emotion behind them . The gravity and credence you give them is entirely up to you . Are you implying that king hitting a chick is the same as telling her to GTFO?

I'm just saying sometimes you get a little bit more than you ask for. Human beings being human beings, who knows how anyone is going to react in any given situation. Some people go their whole lives and somehow never have any trouble and others seem to be able to find it daily. You go round teasing enough dogs eventually one's going to bite you, how hard is up to the dog.

That's the message i try teaching my kids . How to identify the dogs , how to control your inner dog . It's a huge challenge. Especially in a world , where context is losing more and more of its relevance. Still , striking a woman , is a level most blokes never allow themselves to get to . And then there's the ones who actively enjoy it , and revel in it .
And unfortunately some , are taught that it's normal .
It's a crazy world we are all about to enter .
 
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114574) said:
@Russell said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114569) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114559) said:
Josh isn’t going to go to gaol regardless of what happened that night. That we can all agree on. However thinking that it’s ok for a male to physically intimidate, strike, threaten to or the other is simply pathetic. Tigers have 2 of them on their team currently.



@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114559) said:
Josh isn’t going to go to gaol regardless of what happened that night. That we can all agree on. However thinking that it’s ok for a male to physically intimidate, strike, threaten to or the other is simply pathetic. Tigers have 2 of them on their team currently.

Don't think you need to bring Packer into this - he has paid the penalty for his actions. Let that one go Ace.

Zane musgrove

Not concerned about him - I'm talking about Packer - payed the price, even though people like yourself keep dragging it up.
 
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114492) said:
So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.

Baked beans will do it 💨
 
@hobbo1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114495) said:
@TYGA said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114494) said:
A good set of bolt ons can be mesmerising.
6 blokes have fallen for this unbelievable.

I’d take her on ...
She’d come good with Hobbs ?

Geez Hobs,ever heard of 2 wrongs don't make a right...hehehe
 
@tigerballs said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114575) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114573) said:
@Tiger_Steve said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114565) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114550) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114536) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114530) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114515) said:
@JoshColeman99 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114510) said:
The video doesn’t prove anything. While yelling at her like that isn’t a good look he doesn’t touch her and it’s right after she busted into his house so obviously he’ll be angry. Nothing in it I think.

I don’t even know where to start with this. But hopefully you don’t have a missus or a daughter if you think that this is a normal way to interact

Mate , you keep saying this and no one replied because people do have daughters. And if my daughter has done what this girl has done and the worst thing that happened is him swear at her , and tell her to gtfo , Then I would consider that a lucky escape .
You sound like a huge snowflake. If that language is enough for you to drop your bundle than I don't know what to say.
This , even at its worst , is a bruised arm and a few bad words and hurt feelings . Now the fact that her whole accusation has question marks , throws the whole thing into question .
Yet you still double down on some , weird notion of chivalry.


If you were dating my daughter Or mother or sister (theoretically) and u called her a C word and threatened to assault her, Id chin you.

Lol really ? I'd like to see you try.That's absolutely ridiculous.
A. Thier relationship is none of your business, unless abuse is involved.
B. Especially with the type of language used in Aus (eg. A C bomb can be used as a term of endearment ), having a fight where that type of language is used , considering the circumstances, most reasonable people would say , yea fair enough.
C. Anybody who would openly threaten to belt someone, without considering the whole context , based on a short video , is a joke. I believe you would try to put one on my chin , but find that's about all you would be doing .
Your a joke.

Talks big on an anonymous forum. Real tough guy

Meh. I just find the hypocrisy ridiculous. He's saying he's against violence by saying he's going to enact violence for revenge . I get his point of view , just comes across as an idealism we all had when we were 18. Until we all had arguments , where you're called everything and even had things thrown at you, and your idealism starts to be replaced by reality . He's clearly never had a psycho the ex girlfriend .

I once saw a girl sneak up behind a bouncer who was taking a bloke outside and belt him in the back of the head with her high heels. Opened him up. He swung round and put one right on her bean. It wasn't nice but everyone at the time thought "yeah, fair enough".

As I said in a post that was deleted....when under pressure and stress in certain situations people do things they dont normally do ...I have been in the hotel industry for 40 years and I have seen things most on here would gringe at,however things happen and they are dealt with accordingly...
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114526) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114525) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114524) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114521) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114518) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114516) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114512) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114507) said:
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114503) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114502) said:
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114501) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114499) said:
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114497) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114492) said:
So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.

I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.

The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart

That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.

That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.

Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.

I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident

It is relevant to the night of the incident because it casts doubt over whether the night of the incident existed to begin with.

Literally a video, or is that fake as well

That isn’t a video of the incident. Is he being charged for yelling and swearing?

That’s not the entire video released.


Personally Ive never really cared about you making stuff up wrt signings as I find it humourous and entertaining.

you pretending to know more than you do about this case however is not cool and dangerous when peoples reputations are at stake.

You do not know for fact that its the same night or video, I also doubt you have read the police sheets (point us to where they are available.)

Pays to have friends in that industry


You are either the best connected person in Sydney or the biggest BS artist. All evidence so far points one way (LM didnt sign, neither did JAC and we didnt get JR off the cap).

Would have thought everyone would have caught onto Shooting Blanks game now.
 
@TrueTiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114596) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114495) said:
@TYGA said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114494) said:
A good set of bolt ons can be mesmerising.
6 blokes have fallen for this unbelievable.

I’d take her on ...
She’d come good with Hobbs ?

Geez Hobs,ever heard of 2 wrongs don't make a right...hehehe

What about an eye for an eye
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113595) said:
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113541) said:
Say for instance this female has actively tried to get Reynolds arrested/ruin his life etc and it all came out in that conversation that she recorded and heaven forbid he laid his hand on her.....***would he still be seen as the worst guy ever for laying his hands on her*** even though she did her best to screw his life up?

***I don't for one minute condone violence***.....but it is an interesting conversation....did the alleged abuse towards Reynolds trigger him? Would he have done it if he wasn't allegedly so clinically and callously duped?

Just trying to promote conversation.....

A real man would not lay a hand on a woman for any reason or any provocation. There is zero excuse for it, ever, full stop. A weak man assaults a woman, regardless of provocation.

to answer your question, if what this girl has supposedly done could trigger JR to assault her, I guess yes if JR is a weak man and there is no excuse for it.

SMH at what this thread has opened up. Between this thread and the coronavirus thread, we have had a whole new look at our fellow fans.

You ever been spat on by a woman? Assaulted by one through kicking and punching? Had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you by a woman? had a knife pulled on you by a woman? That happens you just going to stand there and use your words?
 
@Cultured_Bogan said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114620) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114526) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114525) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114524) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114521) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114518) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114516) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114512) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114507) said:
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114503) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114502) said:
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114501) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114499) said:
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114497) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114492) said:
So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.

I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.

The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart

That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.

That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.

Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.

I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident

It is relevant to the night of the incident because it casts doubt over whether the night of the incident existed to begin with.

Literally a video, or is that fake as well

That isn’t a video of the incident. Is he being charged for yelling and swearing?

That’s not the entire video released.


Personally Ive never really cared about you making stuff up wrt signings as I find it humourous and entertaining.

you pretending to know more than you do about this case however is not cool and dangerous when peoples reputations are at stake.

You do not know for fact that its the same night or video, I also doubt you have read the police sheets (point us to where they are available.)

Pays to have friends in that industry


You are either the best connected person in Sydney or the biggest BS artist. All evidence so far points one way (LM didnt sign, neither did JAC and we didnt get JR off the cap).

Would have thought everyone would have caught onto Shooting Blanks game now.

Cap gun
 
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114626) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113595) said:
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113541) said:
Say for instance this female has actively tried to get Reynolds arrested/ruin his life etc and it all came out in that conversation that she recorded and heaven forbid he laid his hand on her.....***would he still be seen as the worst guy ever for laying his hands on her*** even though she did her best to screw his life up?

***I don't for one minute condone violence***.....but it is an interesting conversation....did the alleged abuse towards Reynolds trigger him? Would he have done it if he wasn't allegedly so clinically and callously duped?

Just trying to promote conversation.....

A real man would not lay a hand on a woman for any reason or any provocation. There is zero excuse for it, ever, full stop. A weak man assaults a woman, regardless of provocation.

to answer your question, if what this girl has supposedly done could trigger JR to assault her, I guess yes if JR is a weak man and there is no excuse for it.

SMH at what this thread has opened up. Between this thread and the coronavirus thread, we have had a whole new look at our fellow fans.

You ever been spat on by a woman? Assaulted by one through kicking and punching? Had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you by a woman? had a knife pulled on you by a woman? That happens you just going to stand there and use your words?

To answer your question, yes I would hope so. Yes I have had 2 of those things (punch and knife) done to me and I didn’t lay a hand on her.

But as I’ve also said in this thread everyone walks their own path and I can’t judge people.
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113696) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113693) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113631) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113624) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113607) said:
This forum don’t wanna convict JR based on hearsay but want to convict the victim based on hear say. And want to justify JR actions based on the hear say. What evidence you do have is the video of JR losing his mind over something seemingly trivial and threatening to give her the business. Forum members are mixing up 2 doffernet issues.

It's not quite hearsay when your own parents are backing up everybody's sentiments, but even if you ignore that, there are likely documents including medical that back those up. Obviously we don't know that 100% for sure, but it really sounds like these do exist and will be presented in court. Let's wait and see..


100% agree on the wait and see, let the court decide, but I think you are conflating two issues. Even if it is not hearsay, even if everything on the Ch9 report is 100% true, it is still possible that JR assaulted her. The fact that she is a mentally ill, vindictive nasty piece of work that has done horrible things to JR, would not absolve him or anyone of assault.

Agree that it's still possible JR has assaulted her, and yes that claim still stands despite what was revealed yesterday. My point is that even so, as far as I'm aware there's no real evidence that he did do it either. But on the other hand, there is almost certainly some evidence that suggests his partner's credibility is non-existent. Therefore the only reasonable conclusion you could make is that he isn't guilty. I'm not saying he isn't, only that it's more likely that he isn't. Or beyond reasonable doubt as they say..


No question his ex partner appears to have zero credibility. I disagree that the only reasonable conclusion is he isnt guilty. As TrueTiger and others here have made the point that her behaviour may have been the motive and trigger for assault. Agree if it is a he said/she said situation, she is shot.

Still curious how/why as reported Reynolds turned himself in.

According to the reported story Reynolds went to police to report his story about her - probably suspecting he was a victim of fraud. It was then she retaliated with a DV accusation and the video emerged making it public knowledge.
 
What an ugly situation to be in. I honestly don't know how id deal with it. Id like to think id be calm, but hey we all have our breaking points and if JRs allegations about this woman are true, then wow. This is manipulation at its best and is up there with physical domestic violence. This behaviour toward JR will leave scars you can't see. Hopefully the courts can deal with it asap so both parties can move on with their lives. No winners here unfortunately.
 
@Tcat said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114640) said:
What an ugly situation to be in. I honestly don't know how id deal with it. Id like to think id be calm, but hey we all have our breaking points and if JRs allegations about this woman are true, then wow. This is manipulation at its best and is up there with physical domestic violence. This behaviour toward JR will leave scars you can't see. Hopefully the courts can deal with it asap so both parties can move on with their lives. No winners here unfortunately.

April will roll around soon enough, Josh will have his day in court and that will be the end of it.
 
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114626) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113595) said:
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113541) said:
Say for instance this female has actively tried to get Reynolds arrested/ruin his life etc and it all came out in that conversation that she recorded and heaven forbid he laid his hand on her.....***would he still be seen as the worst guy ever for laying his hands on her*** even though she did her best to screw his life up?

***I don't for one minute condone violence***.....but it is an interesting conversation....did the alleged abuse towards Reynolds trigger him? Would he have done it if he wasn't allegedly so clinically and callously duped?

Just trying to promote conversation.....

A real man would not lay a hand on a woman for any reason or any provocation. There is zero excuse for it, ever, full stop. A weak man assaults a woman, regardless of provocation.

to answer your question, if what this girl has supposedly done could trigger JR to assault her, I guess yes if JR is a weak man and there is no excuse for it.

SMH at what this thread has opened up. Between this thread and the coronavirus thread, we have had a whole new look at our fellow fans.

You ever been spat on by a woman? Assaulted by one through kicking and punching? Had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you by a woman? had a knife pulled on you by a woman? That happens you just going to stand there and use your words?

Have you actually had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you? Not disputing it but would love to know the circumstances surrounding it!
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114663) said:
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114626) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113595) said:
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113541) said:
Say for instance this female has actively tried to get Reynolds arrested/ruin his life etc and it all came out in that conversation that she recorded and heaven forbid he laid his hand on her.....***would he still be seen as the worst guy ever for laying his hands on her*** even though she did her best to screw his life up?

***I don't for one minute condone violence***.....but it is an interesting conversation....did the alleged abuse towards Reynolds trigger him? Would he have done it if he wasn't allegedly so clinically and callously duped?

Just trying to promote conversation.....

A real man would not lay a hand on a woman for any reason or any provocation. There is zero excuse for it, ever, full stop. A weak man assaults a woman, regardless of provocation.

to answer your question, if what this girl has supposedly done could trigger JR to assault her, I guess yes if JR is a weak man and there is no excuse for it.

SMH at what this thread has opened up. Between this thread and the coronavirus thread, we have had a whole new look at our fellow fans.

You ever been spat on by a woman? Assaulted by one through kicking and punching? Had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you by a woman? had a knife pulled on you by a woman? That happens you just going to stand there and use your words?

Have you actually had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you? Not disputing it but would love to know the circumstances surrounding it!

I too would like to know this! Must be a good story . Or a really traumatic one .
 
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114667) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114663) said:
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114626) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113595) said:
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113541) said:
Say for instance this female has actively tried to get Reynolds arrested/ruin his life etc and it all came out in that conversation that she recorded and heaven forbid he laid his hand on her.....***would he still be seen as the worst guy ever for laying his hands on her*** even though she did her best to screw his life up?

***I don't for one minute condone violence***.....but it is an interesting conversation....did the alleged abuse towards Reynolds trigger him? Would he have done it if he wasn't allegedly so clinically and callously duped?

Just trying to promote conversation.....

A real man would not lay a hand on a woman for any reason or any provocation. There is zero excuse for it, ever, full stop. A weak man assaults a woman, regardless of provocation.

to answer your question, if what this girl has supposedly done could trigger JR to assault her, I guess yes if JR is a weak man and there is no excuse for it.

SMH at what this thread has opened up. Between this thread and the coronavirus thread, we have had a whole new look at our fellow fans.

You ever been spat on by a woman? Assaulted by one through kicking and punching? Had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you by a woman? had a knife pulled on you by a woman? That happens you just going to stand there and use your words?

Have you actually had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you? Not disputing it but would love to know the circumstances surrounding it!

I too would like to know this! Must be a good story . Or a really traumatic one .


and did he "use his words"? or what else did he use?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top