Josh Reynolds

  • Thread starter Thread starter wokesmoke
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m not advocating for Josh. The video ain’t great. But DV applications by police (on behalf of a complainant) happen without any investigation or evidence. Because there are so many deadbeats out there. Deserves his day in court.
 
@The_Patriot said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113294) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

All for your rumours and signing suggestions but you've lost me here.

Just hanging on to your claims we would get money back on Reynolds. You've been blown out of the water on that one.

Next.


Lol good one
 
@The_Patriot said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113294) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

All for your rumours and signing suggestions but you've lost me here.

Just hanging on to your claims we would get money back on Reynolds. You've been blown out of the water on that one.

Next.


What he said had nothing to do with cap money. Reynolds has been charged with assault. Because she is a piece of work with mental issues means she cant have been assaulted? Or she deserved it?
 
@gallagher said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113296) said:
Was it worth re-opening?

Ye because 50 posts were posted in another thread on the topic and deleting them would be painful...

Here they are contained..
 
@Year_of_the_Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113295) said:
I’m not advocating for Josh. The video ain’t great. But DV applications by police (on behalf of a complainant) happen without any investigation or evidence. Because there are so many deadbeats out there. Deserves his day in court.

For a lawyer you seem pretty dense to the process
 
@tiger05premier said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113288) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113274) said:
@tiger05premier said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113272) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113241) said:
@Sausagesorcerer said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113237) said:
Josh should go on MAFS

I would just for a free holiday ..
Knowing my luck she’d be a Parra supporter ?

As if you'd care

You'd have anybody

True !
My mrs would even pack my suitcase for me ..?

Yeah she told me it won't be long and you'd be gone

Worse than a 2yo she said lol

I’ve almost made it through my 24th footy off season as a married man ...
That calls for another beer ? I reckon !
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113298) said:
@The_Patriot said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113294) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

All for your rumours and signing suggestions but you've lost me here.

Just hanging on to your claims we would get money back on Reynolds. You've been blown out of the water on that one.

Next.


What he said had nothing to do with cap money. Reynolds has been charged with assault. Because she is a piece of work with mental issues means she cant have been assaulted? Or she deserved it?

He has been claiming we are going to have money freed up by releasing Reynolds for weeks now. Numerous posts. Maybe do a little research before going into bat for someone.
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113298) said:
@The_Patriot said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113294) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

All for your rumours and signing suggestions but you've lost me here.

Just hanging on to your claims we would get money back on Reynolds. You've been blown out of the water on that one.

Next.


What he said had nothing to do with cap money. Reynolds has been charged with assault. Because she is a piece of work with mental issues means she cant have been assaulted? Or she deserved it?

In a he said she said case assuming there was no witness. Credibility of the accuser is very important. If there is a proven track record of deception the word of the accuser is diminished.
 
@Year_of_the_Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113295) said:
I’m not advocating for Josh. The video ain’t great. But DV applications by police (on behalf of a complainant) happen without any investigation or evidence. Because there are so many deadbeats out there. Deserves his day in court.


Explain this Mr "Im a lawyer". Do charges of "Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm" happen without any investigation or evidence?

Also Mr Lawyer what is your take on how a report like tonights on Ch9 would impact a case like this?
 
@The_Patriot said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113304) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113298) said:
@The_Patriot said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113294) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

All for your rumours and signing suggestions but you've lost me here.

Just hanging on to your claims we would get money back on Reynolds. You've been blown out of the water on that one.

Next.


What he said had nothing to do with cap money. Reynolds has been charged with assault. Because she is a piece of work with mental issues means she cant have been assaulted? Or she deserved it?

He has been claiming we are going to have money freed up by releasing Reynolds for weeks now. Numerous posts. Maybe do a little research before going into bat for someone.

As well as Reynolds being stood down..

Interesting that this news item occurred the day the ARLC were reportedly discussing these issues..
 
Assault and an application for DV are two different things mate. Happy to get lawyer bashed. I chose the wrong topic to get back into forum on! 😳
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113284) said:
@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113259) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113257) said:
@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113256) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113251) said:
@The_Patriot said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113243) said:
Don't get how people criticise the Eels as a club for lack of integrity yet are happy to throw one our players under the bus just to save a few bucks on the salary cap.

Culture starts at home. Very happy that Pascoe,Maguire and co have stood by Josh

What if he’s found guilty.

No chance.

You should tell the police, maybe they’ll drop the case.

Clever reply mate. Have you thought of writing for a living?


What did he get wrong?

I dont have it in for Josh, I saw the Ch9 piece and drew the same obvious conclusions that everyone else here has, that she seems to have serious issues and Josh seems to have been taken for a row.....*on the face of it.*

But everyone needs to take a step back.

There is a long line of people here now saying "SEE! You have to hear both sides of the story! You cant jump to a conclusion on that video!!!"

Well that is obviously true, but it is just as true based on the Ch9 piece. We still dont know what the hell happened.

As I say on the face of it, she seems a piece of work, with mental health issues and has taken Reynolds on a hard ride, but what would that excuse? Screaming at her, swearing calling her names? Maybe. What if he got sick of it and punched her in the mouth? Would that be excusable based on what she has supposedly done? Of course Im not saying he did punch her in the mouth but none of us know what happened and just as it is right to say he shouldnt be hung based on the video, he also cant be sainted because of a Ch9 piece which makes him look vindicated.

None of us know the truth and you can only hope it comes out clean through the court. You would have to think that this isnt the first the cops have heard of these allegations though.

Of for God's sake. He didn't get anything wrong. He expressed a point of view as did I. My guess is JR will be found not guilty. I could be wrong but I expressed a POV. I don't need to take a step back as you put it. I can express a view and you can disagree just don't pontificate because it's boring.
 
@The_Patriot said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113304) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113298) said:
@The_Patriot said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113294) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

All for your rumours and signing suggestions but you've lost me here.

Just hanging on to your claims we would get money back on Reynolds. You've been blown out of the water on that one.

Next.


What he said had nothing to do with cap money. Reynolds has been charged with assault. Because she is a piece of work with mental issues means she cant have been assaulted? Or she deserved it?

He has been claiming we are going to have money freed up by releasing Reynolds for weeks now. Numerous posts. Maybe do a little research before going into bat for someone.


Yes but the point he raised, that you refuted, had nothing to do with cap money.

Maybe learn to read and comprehend before resorting to weak internet forum passive aggression.
 
@Year_of_the_Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113309) said:
Assault and an application for DV are two different things mate. Happy to get lawyer bashed. I chose the wrong topic to get back into forum on! 😳


He has been charged with Assualt Causing Actual Bodily Harm. Do the cops just slap that on a guy with no investigation or evidence mr Lawyer?
 
Answer is no. I didn’t know that I was responding to DV. It’s worse than I thought. Again assault is a threshold. If he whacked her, he should be gone and is a pig.
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113311) said:
@The_Patriot said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113304) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113298) said:
@The_Patriot said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113294) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

All for your rumours and signing suggestions but you've lost me here.

Just hanging on to your claims we would get money back on Reynolds. You've been blown out of the water on that one.

Next.


What he said had nothing to do with cap money. Reynolds has been charged with assault. Because she is a piece of work with mental issues means she cant have been assaulted? Or she deserved it?

He has been claiming we are going to have money freed up by releasing Reynolds for weeks now. Numerous posts. Maybe do a little research before going into bat for someone.


Yes but the point he raised, that you refuted, had nothing to do with cap money.

Maybe learn to read and comprehend before resorting to weak internet forum passive aggression.

I think you may be confused by the quoting issues on this forum.
 
@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113310) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113284) said:
@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113259) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113257) said:
@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113256) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113251) said:
@The_Patriot said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113243) said:
Don't get how people criticise the Eels as a club for lack of integrity yet are happy to throw one our players under the bus just to save a few bucks on the salary cap.

Culture starts at home. Very happy that Pascoe,Maguire and co have stood by Josh

What if he’s found guilty.

No chance.

You should tell the police, maybe they’ll drop the case.

Clever reply mate. Have you thought of writing for a living?


What did he get wrong?

I dont have it in for Josh, I saw the Ch9 piece and drew the same obvious conclusions that everyone else here has, that she seems to have serious issues and Josh seems to have been taken for a row.....*on the face of it.*

But everyone needs to take a step back.

There is a long line of people here now saying "SEE! You have to hear both sides of the story! You cant jump to a conclusion on that video!!!"

Well that is obviously true, but it is just as true based on the Ch9 piece. We still dont know what the hell happened.

As I say on the face of it, she seems a piece of work, with mental health issues and has taken Reynolds on a hard ride, but what would that excuse? Screaming at her, swearing calling her names? Maybe. What if he got sick of it and punched her in the mouth? Would that be excusable based on what she has supposedly done? Of course Im not saying he did punch her in the mouth but none of us know what happened and just as it is right to say he shouldnt be hung based on the video, he also cant be sainted because of a Ch9 piece which makes him look vindicated.

None of us know the truth and you can only hope it comes out clean through the court. You would have to think that this isnt the first the cops have heard of these allegations though.

Of for God's sake. He didn't get anything wrong. He expressed a point of view as did I. My guess is JR will be found not guilty. I could be wrong but I expressed a POV. I don't need to take a step back as you put it. I can express a view and you can disagree just don't pontificate because it's boring.


Take a breath mate.

I didnt have a go at you. I thought Avo raised a good point and you just mocked it without responding. I genuinely asked what you thought was wrong with it?

I didnt say YOU needed to take a step back, I said we all need to and then explained what I meant (that just as we should rush to hang him on the swearing video, we cant rush to absolve him on the Ch9 piece).

You dont see the irony in you saying you get to express your POV but mine is boring?

Maybe I should have written something concise, witty and pithy like I dont know...."Clever reply, have you thought of being a writer?"

Yeah zingers like that really keep this place humming. Let me know when I can talk next.
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113312) said:
@Year_of_the_Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113309) said:
Assault and an application for DV are two different things mate. Happy to get lawyer bashed. I chose the wrong topic to get back into forum on! ?


He has been charged with Assualt Causing Actual Bodily Harm. Do the cops just slap that on a guy with no investigation or evidence mr Lawyer?

From what I heard in the news report, the charge is for grabbing her on the arm. With all this news coming out and the 5-6 other people he has testifying against her saying the same stuff, I see him being found not guilty.

I’m just hoping the court case is pushed forward and it gets dealt with ASAP.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Back
Top