Josh Reynolds

  • Thread starter Thread starter wokesmoke
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113291) said:
@Year_of_the_Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113282) said:
In my experience, cops slap a DV down like a parking ticket (speaking from experience as a lawyer).

When there’s AVO breaches yes. No AVO in this case. So It suggests it’s more than an arm grab.

That's a false assumption I'm sorry.
 
@Year_of_the_Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113340) said:
Actual bodily harm can be a bruise ... But I’m going to bow out and focus on why I think we’ll make the 8.

Time to focus on footy 😂 the nines is only a week away!!!
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113339) said:
@The_Patriot said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113321) said:
Is Tiger 5150 a secondary account mods?


Option 1 - you can go through my posts its pretty clear who I am, I have covered it previously.
Option 2 - Flag my posts to the mods
Option 3 - Send a DM to the mods asking about me
Option 4 - Send me a DM with any issue you have with me
Option 5 - Put me on foe


6. Just leave it be
 
@AJ1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113334) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113326) said:
@Harvey said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113320) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113312) said:
@Year_of_the_Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113309) said:
Assault and an application for DV are two different things mate. Happy to get lawyer bashed. I chose the wrong topic to get back into forum on! ?


He has been charged with Assualt Causing Actual Bodily Harm. Do the cops just slap that on a guy with no investigation or evidence mr Lawyer?

Yes they do in modern society. If there is any form of domestic disturbance that they attend, generally the male will be taken away and charged. Only thing that will save them is stab wounds, self defence is assault these days.


Understood, however to charge someone with Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, there must be some evidence taken into account? Surely the "actual bodily harm"? would be considered?

Im not passing any opinion on Reynolds guilt or innocence or the severity of any harm, I am merely refuting Mr Lawyer saying these charges would have been laid without any evidence.

Yes you have passed on your opinion. You literally said this before the video broke on Ch9

"I do not know all the facts obviously. However the facts I do know are sufficient for me to make a judgement on the bloke and form my opinion"


And I ***literally*** said in the next post that my opinion on Josh Reynolds has nothing to do with the assault charges against him. I have never said that I thought he was innocent or guity because I wouldnt have a clue. I have said this NUMEROUS times but others here want to project their opinions and biases on me.

I have an opinion on Reynolds, based on facts that I know, experiences I have. I dont like the guy and would prefer he didnt play for my club. Nothing to do with the charges.
 
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113337) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

Doesn't take much to lay a DV charge, not much at all. I originally closed this thread because it was full of nonsense with people going off half cocked and not having any facts whatsoever. I'm privy to facts and I'm more than confident Josh will be acquitted of the charges and there is a very good reason why the NRL haven't stood him down. I can't say more than that for obvious reasons.

Thanks @willow knowing your profession makes this comment carry a fair bit of weight.
 
Quick funny and true story: I fell down the stairs the other day, and the guy from ‘the staircase’ on Netflix is so guilty. I had a few bruises but did not die. My mother laughed more than i did and she is 65. I was full of piss and they say you fall better with a full belly 🤣
 
Seeing that so many on hear are really interested in legal cases I would recommend a top movie currently showing called Just Mercy. Worth watching.
 
@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113327) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113317) said:
@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113310) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113284) said:
@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113259) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113257) said:
@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113256) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113251) said:
@The_Patriot said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113243) said:
Don't get how people criticise the Eels as a club for lack of integrity yet are happy to throw one our players under the bus just to save a few bucks on the salary cap.

Culture starts at home. Very happy that Pascoe,Maguire and co have stood by Josh

What if he’s found guilty.

No chance.

You should tell the police, maybe they’ll drop the case.

Clever reply mate. Have you thought of writing for a living?


What did he get wrong?

I dont have it in for Josh, I saw the Ch9 piece and drew the same obvious conclusions that everyone else here has, that she seems to have serious issues and Josh seems to have been taken for a row.....*on the face of it.*

But everyone needs to take a step back.

There is a long line of people here now saying "SEE! You have to hear both sides of the story! You cant jump to a conclusion on that video!!!"

Well that is obviously true, but it is just as true based on the Ch9 piece. We still dont know what the hell happened.

As I say on the face of it, she seems a piece of work, with mental health issues and has taken Reynolds on a hard ride, but what would that excuse? Screaming at her, swearing calling her names? Maybe. What if he got sick of it and punched her in the mouth? Would that be excusable based on what she has supposedly done? Of course Im not saying he did punch her in the mouth but none of us know what happened and just as it is right to say he shouldnt be hung based on the video, he also cant be sainted because of a Ch9 piece which makes him look vindicated.

None of us know the truth and you can only hope it comes out clean through the court. You would have to think that this isnt the first the cops have heard of these allegations though.

Of for God's sake. He didn't get anything wrong. He expressed a point of view as did I. My guess is JR will be found not guilty. I could be wrong but I expressed a POV. I don't need to take a step back as you put it. I can express a view and you can disagree just don't pontificate because it's boring.


Take a breath mate.

I didnt have a go at you. I thought Avo raised a good point and you just mocked it without responding. I genuinely asked what you thought was wrong with it?

I didnt say YOU needed to take a step back, I said we all need to and then explained what I meant (that just as we should rush to hang him on the swearing video, we cant rush to absolve him on the Ch9 piece).

You dont see the irony in you saying you get to express your POV but mine is boring?

Maybe I should have written something concise, witty and pithy like I dont know...."Clever reply, have you thought of being a writer?"

Yeah zingers like that really keep this place humming. Let me know when I can talk next.

Why do we all need to take a step back? ***Because you think so?*** Who absolved him - not me.
I expressed a view that I think he'll be found not guilty. Is that not OK in your world? I didn't see your POV was boring, I said your pontificating was boring. And it is. ***If you don't like what I have to say that's OK,*** just make a mature and intelligent comment and try not to pontificate.

Man the lack of self awareness....no mirrors in your house. Just ignore me. Put me on foe if you have to.

Ill express my opinion when I want, how I want.
 
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

It doesn't work like this mate. They charge first and then let the legal system work it out. The problem is all the political correctness in society today impacts the legal system and we get situations like this.

It's plain wrong and hopefully a bunch of posters on here including yourself will learn a lesson not to judge people like Josh too harshly in these situations.

Women beaters aren't good people but neither are women that use the legal system to play games.
 
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113336) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113326) said:
however to charge someone with Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, there must be some evidence taken into account? Surely the “actual bodily harm”? would be considered?

There has to be evidence of an injury for the charge of actual bodily harm to be added.


That was my point. Mr Lawyer said that these charges are slapped on without evidence.
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113349) said:
@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113327) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113317) said:
@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113310) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113284) said:
@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113259) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113257) said:
@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113256) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113251) said:
@The_Patriot said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113243) said:
Don't get how people criticise the Eels as a club for lack of integrity yet are happy to throw one our players under the bus just to save a few bucks on the salary cap.

Culture starts at home. Very happy that Pascoe,Maguire and co have stood by Josh

What if he’s found guilty.

No chance.

You should tell the police, maybe they’ll drop the case.

Clever reply mate. Have you thought of writing for a living?


What did he get wrong?

I dont have it in for Josh, I saw the Ch9 piece and drew the same obvious conclusions that everyone else here has, that she seems to have serious issues and Josh seems to have been taken for a row.....*on the face of it.*

But everyone needs to take a step back.

There is a long line of people here now saying "SEE! You have to hear both sides of the story! You cant jump to a conclusion on that video!!!"

Well that is obviously true, but it is just as true based on the Ch9 piece. We still dont know what the hell happened.

As I say on the face of it, she seems a piece of work, with mental health issues and has taken Reynolds on a hard ride, but what would that excuse? Screaming at her, swearing calling her names? Maybe. What if he got sick of it and punched her in the mouth? Would that be excusable based on what she has supposedly done? Of course Im not saying he did punch her in the mouth but none of us know what happened and just as it is right to say he shouldnt be hung based on the video, he also cant be sainted because of a Ch9 piece which makes him look vindicated.

None of us know the truth and you can only hope it comes out clean through the court. You would have to think that this isnt the first the cops have heard of these allegations though.

Of for God's sake. He didn't get anything wrong. He expressed a point of view as did I. My guess is JR will be found not guilty. I could be wrong but I expressed a POV. I don't need to take a step back as you put it. I can express a view and you can disagree just don't pontificate because it's boring.


Take a breath mate.

I didnt have a go at you. I thought Avo raised a good point and you just mocked it without responding. I genuinely asked what you thought was wrong with it?

I didnt say YOU needed to take a step back, I said we all need to and then explained what I meant (that just as we should rush to hang him on the swearing video, we cant rush to absolve him on the Ch9 piece).

You dont see the irony in you saying you get to express your POV but mine is boring?

Maybe I should have written something concise, witty and pithy like I dont know...."Clever reply, have you thought of being a writer?"

Yeah zingers like that really keep this place humming. Let me know when I can talk next.

Why do we all need to take a step back? ***Because you think so?*** Who absolved him - not me.
I expressed a view that I think he'll be found not guilty. Is that not OK in your world? I didn't see your POV was boring, I said your pontificating was boring. And it is. ***If you don't like what I have to say that's OK,*** just make a mature and intelligent comment and try not to pontificate.

Man the lack of self awareness....no mirrors in your house. Just ignore me. Put me on foe if you have to.

Ill express my opinion when I want, how I want.

As will I.
 
Tiger5150, dm me mate if you want to discuss, 1. Whether I am a lawyer 2. My experience in these matters. Otherwise, I would love to be referred to as YOT 🙏
 
@Harvey said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113320) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113312) said:
@Year_of_the_Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113309) said:
Assault and an application for DV are two different things mate. Happy to get lawyer bashed. I chose the wrong topic to get back into forum on! ?


He has been charged with Assualt Causing Actual Bodily Harm. Do the cops just slap that on a guy with no investigation or evidence mr Lawyer?

Yes they do in modern society. If there is any form of domestic disturbance that they attend, generally the male will be taken away and charged. Only thing that will save them is stab wounds, self defence is assault these days.

This is how it works nowadays. If a woman is going crazy and you grab her on the arms to protect yourself you can expect to be up on assault charges.

It's ridiculous.
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113352) said:
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113336) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113326) said:
however to charge someone with Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, there must be some evidence taken into account? Surely the “actual bodily harm”? would be considered?

There has to be evidence of an injury for the charge of actual bodily harm to be added.


That was my point. Mr Lawyer said that these charges are slapped on without evidence.

Evidence of an injury though does not necessarily show how the injury occurred. A person could have a bruise or a scratch but that does not mean it was caused in an assault. The person making the complaint obviously had an injury of some kind, it is up to the courts to decide how that occurred!
 
@Earl said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113351) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113281) said:
Police and prosecution don’t just lay DV charges for the sake of it. Just because this woman may be and probably is mentally unwell doesn’t mean josh didn’t do anything. Got to see how the courts decide it.

It doesn't work like this mate. They charge first and then let the legal system work it out. The problem is all the political correctness in society today impacts the legal system and we get situations like this.

It's plain wrong and hopefully a bunch of posters on here including yourself will learn a lesson not to judge people like Josh too harshly in these situations.

Women beaters aren't good people but neither are women that use the legal system to play games.

So the way he spoke to her is okay now?
 
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113359) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113352) said:
@cochise said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113336) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113326) said:
however to charge someone with Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, there must be some evidence taken into account? Surely the “actual bodily harm”? would be considered?

There has to be evidence of an injury for the charge of actual bodily harm to be added.


That was my point. Mr Lawyer said that these charges are slapped on without evidence.

Evidence of an injury though does not necessarily show how the injury occurred. A person could have a bruise or a scratch but that does not mean it was caused in an assault. The person making the complaint obviously had an injury of some kind, it is up to the courts to decide how that occurred!


Of course agree 100%
 
@Year_of_the_Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113356) said:
Tiger5150, dm me mate if you want to discuss, 1. Whether I am a lawyer 2. My experience in these matters. Otherwise, I would love to be referred to as YOT 🙏


Nah...I'll leave it be. Thanks for the mature response, I pushed it a bit far. Enjoy your evening YOT
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top