balmain boy
Well-known member
They travel from poorer working class areas to nicer areas. It's just nature, people want to move u up in the world. Which for many involves getting out of Campbelltown
Juniors - Pathways General Discussion
- Thread starter innsaneink
- Start date
In 2025 so 1 year ago , he was voted best player in his age group . The kid is a gun.
Not really plenty of people move around for that opportunity not just Campbelltown
Betterdays22
Well-known member
It was more in response to the rumour of there being essentially an A and B team. May as well field one team.
Regardless, shouldn't the point be to field strong junior rep teams that produce NRL level talent?
I don't claim to be an expert but how many times has Balmain made the finals in Ball or Matts in the last 5 years? How many NRL players or potential NRL players have been produced? Magpies also wildy underperform for their catchment. Something needs to change.
Last edited:
BinChicken
Well-known member
Maafu has 100% signed with the club. Not sure about Kerr or Aroyan.
BinChicken
Well-known member
From what I understand it’s less about stacking Western Suburbs and more about spreading the talent across both pathways. We’ve already seen that this year with Noah Vaotangi playing for Balmain and Harry Bickhoff going the other way. I don’t believe we’ll see an A and B team
king_sirro
Well-known member
Thats not what I have been told.
Rock Hopper Steve
Well-known member
I don't want 2 teams in the one competition, it just dilutes talent, have one strong team so the players coming through the grades have a greater chance of having a winning culture.
Imagine if we could achieve top 4 contenders right through the grades, not many would want to leave and yes, all the teams should be called Wests Tigers.
Imagine if we could achieve top 4 contenders right through the grades, not many would want to leave and yes, all the teams should be called Wests Tigers.
Last edited:
Having a successful junior rep season each year needs to be a high priority and obviously having one team of all our best players in each age group is our best chance of that happening.
Say the team is called Wests Tigers, where would be the best place to train to best include our best players from the South-West and MacArthur regions as well as our best players from the Inner West / Balmain district?
Not forgetting we would still ideally be recruiting some external take talent for each of these teams each season.
I think it would be to our own detriment if we ignored training somewhere within the South-West / MacArthur regions as it’s a big catchment area and we need to try and ensure as much of the best talent possible plays junior reps in Wests Tigers colours.
I would propose 2 training sessions per week within this region and 1 training session per week within the Inner West / Balmain junior district.
Providing the team looked very strong, I think most players and families would compromise and agree to this type of arrangement.
As for the argument whether or not a 2nd team in each age group is viable, my question is why not?
The Roisters use Central Coast Roosters as their 2nd team in each age group and their teams generally finish the the btttom half of the ladder, but it’s still a worthwhile excersize if they uncover a couple of players each season that can progress tj their Sydney Roosters teams, Jersey Flegg or NSW Cup etc
Jacob Preston is a great example of being a Nanly local junior who was never considered good enough for their junior rep teams. I bet Manly would love him in their NRL team right now and maybe if they has a 2nd tier team, meaning a bigger catchment of players for their elite pathways, he could have been part of that and developed within their system, rather than become disappointed and head to the Bears.
Rock Hopper Steve
Well-known member
Yes: split the training between 2 venues so the travelling is fair
No: one team only, we have been running out 2 teams for years and it's not working.
I agree that the time has come that we need a strong combined team capable of getting good results in our junior reps each season.
Once tgat happens it just breeds confidence, provides a much higher chance of regularly producing our own elite players and means we are less reliant on external recruitment.
I still don’t see the harm in keeping a B team, but would still be content if we just focused on one strong team per age group.
Last edited:
Red88_Tiger
Well-known member
I see merit in an a and b side. I’m sure if little johny couldn’t make the a side training but could make the b side I’d be pretty certain that he would be selected in the b side.
The kicker would be the difference in coaching access especially on positions roles,defence and attack .
Though it would be nice to see both sides train together even if it’s only every couple of weeks. Leave your wests and Balmain kits at home and train in your weststigers training shirt
The kicker would be the difference in coaching access especially on positions roles,defence and attack .
Though it would be nice to see both sides train together even if it’s only every couple of weeks. Leave your wests and Balmain kits at home and train in your weststigers training shirt
balmain boy
Well-known member
+ @Vicious
This is the worst thing we could possibly do. This is local, junior rep footy. We must have 2 teams. Geography demands this. Having one team is moronic. Making juniors travel from the SW to Concord is stupid, as is asking inner west players to travel to the sw. It will not work. Families will not do it. Nor is there any need or advantage to do it
We represent two different geographical regions. This fact is at the very heart of the club.
We need 2 high functioning junior rep sides. Most clubs spend more money on their single junior two side than we spend on both our sides. It's embarrassing. If HBG want to remain our owners they get given an ultimatum to spend an extra 2-3 million a year on junior reps. We must use our geography to our advantage and have the best of the west and the best of the inner west.
Then have flegg and cup as Wests Tigers. We unite from that age group onwards and have regular Cub programs to unite the two sides.
Last edited:
balmain boy
Well-known member
Yes the point of junior reps should be to produce NRL standard players. Absolutely. And we're barely even trying to do this currently. We invest a fraction of the funds that other clubs do in this area.
Balmain in particular have been run on the smell of an oily rag for fast too long. The neglect shown by Wests Ashfield is astonishing. Yes they're funding the side, at the absolute minimum level possible.
Balmain should be competing with Parra and the dogs for the best juniors in the area. Not just taking the leftovers. despite this Balmain has still often finished above the better funded Wests side.
Having two inadequately supported clubs is embarrassing and you're right, something needs to change, we need to start treating juniors with respect and give them the funding and resources they deserve! This might help us produce more NRL standard players, and have players develop the skills throughout their time at the club.
Our junior clubs have developed very few NRL players in the past few years. Balmain have Pole, Seyfarth and Sukkar. Wests have had Makasini and Saukuru
Rock Hopper Steve
Well-known member
Mate, I get the logistic problems associated with the one team and don't know the answer to it.
But how long now have we had 2 teams playing, how successful have their seasons been.
Wouldn't the culture improve if the one strong team was anchored at the top of the competition with more wins than losses.
balmain boy
Well-known member
The first step is tripling the money we spend on each side.
Once we do that both should be competitive.
Both sides are unsuccessful because we treat them like a nuisance rather than an asset.
