Justin Olam #281

mtd#2 said:
I disagree. I thought the games he played he was solid. A few big hits and a send off, bit unlucky considering some of the other "high" tackles this year
Click to expand...
Agree with you.

Was awesome early in the season and struggled on with an obvious injury.

That send off was just typical. I still don’t think he contacted his head. If he did, ol mate would still be unconscious.
 
Magpie_Magic said:
Really hope this guy steps up in a better backline next year.

He let Benji down with his discipline and even defensive lapses this year.
Click to expand...
Silly fella thought he could get away with the same things he got away with at Melbourne.

If he did precisely the same thing here that he did there with Sam Walker, he'd be banned for a hundred years.
 
Twodogs said:
Silly fella thought he could get away with the same things he got away with at Melbourne.

If he did precisely the same thing here that he did there with Sam Walker, he'd be banned for a hundred years.
Click to expand...
You mean this?

Yea it looks bad. Unsure how he would pull up, but yea melbourne and Penrith will get away with it.
 
why why why,plenty of chat here lately about moving/paying players out willy nilly.Good test about Bunjies /it wasn't fulton,knowledge on medically retiring players.honestly wish him the best,did we get value?
 
Was still difficult to handle one on one this year but his lateral movement was poor, probably the bung knees.

With more depth in our outside backs hopefully the club bring him back when he’s fully fit.

Look forward to our sets getting started with strong carries by Olam, Turuva and Skelton. Was our biggest weakness in 24’
 
crazycat said:
You mean this?

Yea it looks bad. Unsure how he would pull up, but yea melbourne and Penrith will get away with it.
Click to expand...
That clip x100 for every defensive decision Olam has made in his career is what had me most concerned about his signing bung knees or not.
It’s more the mindset to run 20metres in field and approach a halfback who has 4 options available to him and launch at him blindly like a missle without guidance control.
 
Needaname said:
That clip x100 for every defensive decision Olam has made in his career is what had me most concerned about his signing bung knees or not.
It’s more the mindset to run 20metres in field and approach a halfback who has 4 options available to him and launch at him blindly like a missle without guidance control.
Click to expand...
Roosters had a 3 on one if you review that clip again. He did the only thing possible to thwart a try even though it failed, I’d be wrapping that effort as his coach.
 
IMHO, our biggest and (sadly) chronic issues are the rack control, defense, strong/dominant tackles and meters run. Too many of the forwards are of the same mold: Woods, Eisenhuth, Twal and Seyfarth. They play like they were given the strongest anti-aggression drugs.
 
InBenjiWeTrust said:
IMHO, our biggest and (sadly) chronic issues are the rack control, defense, strong/dominant tackles and meters run. Too many of the forwards are of the same mould: Woods, Eisenhuth, Twal and Seyfarth. They play like they were given the strongest anti-aggression drugs.
Click to expand...
Defense is attitude. BA talked about Parramatta playing their best when they wanted the collision.

It’s been a long time since a WT side truly wanted the collision. We normally jag wins when our opponent doesn’t show up for it either.

It comes with signing guys who come for the dough primarily.
 
BAGNF05 said:
Roosters had a 3 on one if you review that clip again. He did the only thing possible to thwart a try even though it failed, I’d be wrapping that effort as his coach.
Click to expand...
Right; with Walker covered by the sweeping defence Olam in position as you can see from this photo of standing upright and holding decides to come infield 5m and dive from 2m out and hit Walker at the time the ball is halfway airbourne to the wing.
Meanwhile Nat Butcher is open, the sweep is open and the winger may of been marked by Coates had he not been forced to follow Olam in.
Great Job!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4611.jpeg
    IMG_4611.jpeg
    459.8 KB · Views: 11
Needaname said:
Right; with Walker covered by the sweeping defence Olam in position as you can see from this photo of standing upright and holding decides to come infield 5m and dive from 2m out and hit Walker at the time the ball is halfway airbourne to the wing.
Meanwhile Nat Butcher is open, the sweep is open and the winger may of been marked by Coates had he not been forced to follow Olam in.
Great Job!
Click to expand...
There’s three men outside Walker and no cover defenders, the play there is to jam every time. NRL sides can catch and pass if you don’t.
 
BAGNF05 said:
There’s three men outside Walker and no cover defenders, the play there is to jam every time. NRL sides can catch and pass if you don’t.
Click to expand...
Sorry, wrong term, ‘covered by the sliding defence’. He was on a hiding to nothing which I’ll admit but my first instinct would be to keep my feet call the sliders over to put inside pressure on Walker whilst holding on Butcher and sliding out to the fullback leaving Oates to cover from inside out.
 
Needaname said:
Sorry, wrong term, ‘covered by the sliding defence’. He was on a hiding to nothing which I’ll admit but my first instinct would be to keep my feet call the sliders over to put inside pressure on Walker whilst holding on Butcher and sliding out to the fullback leaving Oates to cover from inside out.
Click to expand...
The defenders inside look to have been caught up with the markers and aren’t coming. You’re right, it’s a pretty hopeless situation, if he doesn’t jam in Walker dummies and scores untouched, or they simply catch and pass to the winger.

As a coach, I’m educating players in this scenario to rush the playmaker and hope to force an error/ bad pass.

Im aware Olam overuses this defensive ploy but I think he got this decision right.
 
BAGNF05 said:
The defenders inside look to have been caught up with the markers and aren’t coming. You’re right, it’s a pretty hopeless situation, if he doesn’t jam in Walker dummies and scores untouched, or they simply catch and pass to the winger.

As a coach, I’m educating players in this scenario to rush the playmaker and hope to force an error/ bad pass.

Im aware Olam overuses this defensive ploy but I think he got this decision right.
Click to expand...
True, good conversation. There is a chance it could happen (force an error) but he is a bit late with the contact. I’ve seen him in other tackles get the half in time and shut down the play. I’d like him to have both options available in his kit bag but he just seems inclined to launch low and hard like a missile going for the hit and not the strategy.
 
Needaname said:
True, good conversation. There is a chance it could happen (force an error) but he is a bit late with the contact. I’ve seen him in other tackles get the half in time and shut down the play. I’d like him to have both options available in his kit bag but he just seems inclined to launch low and hard like a missile going for the hit and not the strategy.
Click to expand...
As a general rule I like centres and wingers to be passive until you get into a red zone situation like this one. Then it’s all out jam if you find yourself hopelessly outnumbered.

The in between play that Noffa was famous for is a gold ticket to meet the reserve grade coach.
 
BAGNF05 said:
Defense is attitude. BA talked about Parramatta playing their best when they wanted the collision.

It’s been a long time since a WT side truly wanted the collision. We normally jag wins when our opponent doesn’t show up for it either.
Click to expand...
From memory, Gavet from the NZ just joined us, we had Woods, Semanufagai and Sue and Gavet on the bench. That was one of those rare occasions when our guys dominated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 605 (members: 3, guests: 602)
Back
Top