Kick chase is not luck

To what end though?
What does the NRL get out of it?
It’s not about them, it’s systemic refereeing bias against Wests. Are you still upset about Davey?

NRL/media on both recent occasions: "robbed",

If this were not the case it’d say lost… You would presume to know more than those in the know.

It’s to the end that teams with handshake deals and legends like Scum Smith receive the direct benefit of biased calls and not teams like ours.

They’ll say it’s not something large enough (Cows and Raiders losses, or 4 PTS) to take precedence over their organisation’s rulings and the nepotistic oversight present within bunker and on-field adjudications and thus, as already summarised above, we receive an apology and not the competition points.

If you think our CEO - who’s very competent in this area of law - would publicly state (after last years fiasco) that he’s attempting to hold the ENTIRE NRL to account with some kind of legal intervention, to reinstate said points, without very clear and unambiguous evidence pointing toward this then you’re dumber than you look.

The end is the sanitised finished product.
 
Last edited:
It’s not about them, it’s systemic refereeing bias against Wests. Are you still upset about Davey?

NRL/media on both recent occasions: "robbed",

If this were not the case it’d say lost… You would presume to know more than those in the know.

It’s to the end that teams with handshake deals and legends like Scum Smith receive the direct benefit of biased calls and not teams like ours.

They’ll say it’s not something large enough (Cows and Raiders losses, or 4 PTS) to take precedence over their organisation’s rulings and the nepotistic oversight present within bunker and on-field adjudications and thus, as already summarised above, we receive an apology and not the competition points.

If you think our CEO - who’s very competent in this area of law - would publicly state (after last years fiasco) that he’s attempting to hold the ENTIRE NRL to account with some kind of legal intervention, to reinstate said points, without some very clear and unambiguous kind of evidence pointing toward this, then you’re dumber than you look.

The end is the sanitised finished product.

It’s not about them, it’s systemic refereeing bias against Wests. Are you still upset about Davey?

NRL/media on both recent occasions: "robbed",

If this were not the case it’d say lost… You would presume to know more than those in the know.

It’s to the end that teams with handshake deals and legends like Scum Smith receive the direct benefit of biased calls and not teams like ours.

They’ll say it’s not something large enough (Cows and Raiders losses, or 4 PTS) to take precedence over their organisation’s rulings and the nepotistic oversight present within bunker and on-field adjudications and thus, as already summarised above, we receive an apology and not the competition points.

If you think our CEO - who’s very competent in this area of law - would publicly state (after last years fiasco) that he’s attempting to hold the ENTIRE NRL to account with some kind of legal intervention, to reinstate said points, without some very clear and unambiguous kind of evidence pointing toward this, then you’re dumber than you look.

The end is the sanitised finished product.
Seek help man, this is sad.
 
It’s not about them, it’s systemic refereeing bias against Wests. Are you still upset about Davey?

NRL/media on both recent occasions: "robbed",

If this were not the case it’d say lost… You would presume to know more than those in the know.

It’s to the end that teams with handshake deals and legends like Scum Smith receive the direct benefit of biased calls and not teams like ours.

They’ll say it’s not something large enough (Cows and Raiders losses, or 4 PTS) to take precedence over their organisation’s rulings and the nepotistic oversight present within bunker and on-field adjudications and thus, as already summarised above, we receive an apology and not the competition points.

If you think our CEO - who’s very competent in this area of law - would publicly state (after last years fiasco) that he’s attempting to hold the ENTIRE NRL to account with some kind of legal intervention, to reinstate said points, without some very clear and unambiguous kind of evidence pointing toward this, then you’re dumber than you look.

The end is the sanitised finished product.
Seek help man, this is sad.
 
As I said, you are a terrible idiot that applauds incompetence.
Typical retort of a halfwit, u really have issues don’t you! Champ u need to get out of your mothers basement.
Our half did his acl early, one of our halves started the week before the season started. We find it hard to attract players due to be wooden spooners and being poor for many seasons. Yet you and your negative Nancy mates bag us when we are playing bad, playing better, or even playing well. Your never happy again as I have stated your an attention seeker looking for any grab u can get, are you Paul Kent??
 
I use to watch every match every weekend and this is bais in match's the worst was 2014 with South's

I was once told some ref's are on the take to give the rub of the green to a certain team at the time I was thinking it was a lie but the more I have watched the more I believe it
 
I use to watch every match every weekend and this is bais in match's the worst was 2014 with South's

I was once told some ref's are on the take to give the rub of the green to a certain team at the time I was thinking it was a lie but the more I have watched the more I believe it
That’s all I’m suggesting to his feeble intellect.
 
Typical retort of a halfwit, u really have issues don’t you! Champ u need to get out of your mothers basement.
Our half did his acl early, one of our halves started the week before the season started. We find it hard to attract players due to be wooden spooners and being poor for many seasons. Yet you and your negative Nancy mates bag us when we are playing bad, playing better, or even playing well. Your never happy again as I have stated your an attention seeker looking for any grab u can get, are you Paul Kent??
I’ve already told you when I was happy with the team this year.
Comprehension is not a strong suit with you.
 
You should try the ignore function. It makes this spot so much better.
Hey Earl, which personality are we using today?
Is Brooks hopeless as you claimed for the first 2 months, or is he playing great like you have started saying recently?
It’s hard to keep up with a fake poster with no integrity…
 
Staines was competing hard on every high ball he could physically get to.
He would clearly be the fastest player at our club, he’s an absolute must keep as a starting winger and back up fullback in my opinion.
In saying this the attacking high balls from our halves are often too deep.
 
Not withstandind the element of luck (which I think plays as much a part as does the bounce of the ball) the real question is why are we not putting pressure on the kicker (not of the Papali'i kind..) so that the "skill" of the kick chase is somewhat diminished. We didn't do it that well, and come to think of it, neither was our kick-chase.
 
Not withstandind the element of luck (which I think plays as much a part as does the bounce of the ball) the real question is why are we not putting pressure on the kicker (not of the Papali'i kind..) so that the "skill" of the kick chase is somewhat diminished. We didn't do it that well, and come to think of it, neither was our kick-chase.
Agreed. There are a few subtle parts to our game that are poorly contested.
Highballs are obvious as you have illustrated. We tend to all stop when a grubber is put in as well instead of being on high alert for ricochets or fumbles. Another area is backing up someone who has made a line break. Not enough urgency to turn a break into points.
 
Back
Top