Killing off suburban rugby league tradition a mistake

innsaneink

Well-known member
THE state government has stamped a death notice on one of Sydney’s favourite Sunday afternoon activities — watching NRL games at traditional old suburban grounds.
>
The days of getting rugged up on weekend afternoons to enjoy a pie and beer on the hill at the famous footy ovals are soon to be gone under plans to raise our sporting facilities to an international level.
>
Sports Minister Stuart Ayres said the government would no longer invest in the district venues where rugby league has been played for more than a century. Instead, money would be poured into major upgrades at Allianz and ANZ stadiums, including a ­retractable roof over the Homebush Olympic venue.
>
ROTHFIELD COMMENT: KILLING OFF SUBURBAN FOOTY A MISTAKE
http://www.news.com.au/sport/nrl/killing-off-suburban-rugby-league-tradition-will-be-a-mistake/story-fndujljl-1226987010146
>
Old favourites such as Leichhardt Oval, Shark Park, Brookvale and Kogarah will either be left to rot or become training facilities and multi-purpose venues for wider use, similar to Redfern Oval and Belmore Sports Ground.
\
\
Mr Ayres insisted all future government spending would be restricted to the bigger ­facilities, ANZ and Allianz, plus a third, as yet undetermined, venue in Sydney’s west.
>
He said nine Sydney NRL clubs can only survive in such a cramped market by generating more revenue from higher memberships and use of the bigger venues.
>
Thank you for voting!
Agree - it's the way of the future 20.32% (292 votes)
**Disagree** - suburban grounds are the soul of rugby league **79.68%** (1,145 votes)
Total Votes: 1,437
Return To Poll
>
“My long-term view … is that we have to make the transition from suburban grounds to major stadium facilities,” Mr Ayres said.
>
“Sport in NSW will not compete ­nationally or internationally if we restrict ourselves to suburban facilities.
\
\
“If you’re an NRL club driving towards 20,000 to 25,000 members, the suburban ground will not service your membership and won’t have enough seats to sell to other customers as well.”
>
Pressed about losing old favourites such as Leichhardt Oval, the minister stood firm.
>
“Absolutely it’s special and important to that community,” he said. “But its role as a facility to play national sport in is limited to maybe one or two events a year.
>
“I don’t see it as part of our core strategy in NSW. It offers some nostalgia but not as a ­financially viable sports base.
\
\
“The biggest impact on Sydney crowds is the poor state of facilities and the ­accessibility of these facilities.
>
“People have been turning away from small suburban grounds ... because they don’t offer the experience you get at home watching Channel Nine or Foxtel.
>
“So they don’t go as frequently as they would if they were offered a better product. If we offer good quality facilities they will turn up.”
>
Mr Ayres is a fanatical Panthers fan, whose own home ground could be in the firing line under the new policy.
\
\
“I love watching the Panthers at home,” he said, “But if it’s the 14th of July and you’re sitting up on the northern hill on a Monday night, it’s pretty cold and the experience isn’t all that hospitable.”
>
The future of the Penrith facility will be the centre of ­interesting manoeuvring in coming months, with the minister caught in a tough situation. He is the local member for Penrith and has formed a tight relationship with influential Panthers boss Phil Gould, who is furiously lobbying for the third stadium to be built on the site of their current home ground.
>
This is despite pressure on the government to do the more obvious redevelopment of Parramatta Stadium, home to the Eels and the Western Sydney Wanderers, who boast massive supporter bases.
>
Already, $29 million of federal and state money has been committed to Parramatta, which will only increase the venue by 4000 seats and ­improve training facilities.
>
“Sport has to pay its own way in the NSW budget,” Mr Ayres said, adding that he was confident Sydney would eventually overtake Melbourne as the nation’s sporting capital.
>
Originally published as Fulltime for suburban footy

Some of his comments are weak, very weak:
Yes, its pretty obvious I dont get the same experience watching on TV at home compared to at a suburban ground...but thats exactly the same if the games at the big stadiums too :crazy

Cold on the hill at penrith during a night game huh?
So moving it to 20km down the road to Homebush on the same night makes sooo much difference :crazy

I dont mind the big stadiums for the big games, but 15k at ANZ is depressing and sad...where at Cambo or LO its totally different (when we are playing well)
The ridiculously low priced deals we saw this year will dry up eventually if this is the only option.

Ive long been a proponent for one home ground for us, the advantage we lose moving around constantly has cost us imo....but sharing with three four or five other clubs is pointless and the advantage a real home ground holds is gone.

For many many fans, tribalism is what attracted us to the game, you supported your local team, you were proud of you area and district and your home ground was your castle and when away teams were sent packing after a loss to your team there was no better feeling for the following week.

The games losing me slowly, referees ineptness...constant rules changes, the amateur way the game is run ie Origin, the draw fiasco etc ...the BS that is membership in trying to make the mug fan like you & me feel like were important when in reality the corporates is all they give a stuff about
 
It's only a matter of 'when' not 'if' the likes of Leichhardt Oval are abandoned as grounds where you go to watch NRL matches. Regardless of if we as individuals like it or not the future is large stadiums. We need to grow and that means trying to fill large stadiums of at least 45,000+ capacity.

It's the future, so let's move on and do it. Don't hold back the game by hanging on to grounds that belong in an era that past by a few decades ago. It's time to move and look forward not back.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_
 
So if the NRL & the State Govt propose moves that fans arent happy with, and those fans vote with their feet…its the fans holding the game back?

They keep saying this is a business, and the game and where its played is the product.
They have to make the product appealing...this wont appeal to many, and theyll take their business elsewhere
 
Ink & Mike, I agree with both your sentiments. I am an old Balmain Tiger who used to attend every game when there were only 12 Sydney teams.

Back then everything about home grounds appeared pretty even. Each ground was much the same as the other - small, old & basic.

Leichardt oval
Lidcombe oval
Endeavour field
Sydney sports ground
Redfern oval
Belmore sports ground
Cumberland oval
Kogarah oval
Penrith park
Brookvale oval
North Sydney oval
Henson park

The match of the round teams got to play at the SCG

I remember the great menu at Leichardt - hot dogs and Big Ben pies. These are wonderful memories for me. But they are just memories now.

No government in the past had the foresight to build decent grounds. It was only when Sydney got the Olympics that money was spent. I can't blame the government though because every team would demand the same money, time and attention.

I still believe that there are too many Sydney NRL teams for todays professional game. I can see a proper national competition with fewer Sydney teams but probably not in my lifetime.

That politician is right when he says that all teams should be growing their memberships. He is right with his thoughts on providing those members with better facilities.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_
 
@innsaneink said:
So if the NRL & the State Govt propose moves that fans arent happy with, and those fans vote with their feet…its the fans holding the game back?

They keep saying this is a business, and the game and where its played is the product.
They have to make the product appealing...this wont appeal to many, and theyll take their business elsewhere

I disagree. It won't appeal to some and that's the issue. Better facilities will appeal to a lot more. IMO I believe the fact that we have 3 home grounds, 2 of which are sub-standard suburban grounds, hurts our membership numbers. Time to move on and grow.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_
 
So - Big stadiums are the way to go. So much BS.

This guy has no idea.

When are you going to get 45,000+ at the two big stadiums with the Tigers v Storm, or Warriors, or Cowboys, or Canberra or Broncos?
So we will be reduced to 20,000 at best and 19,000 of these will be Tigers supporters.
The atmosphere is just so good under those circumstances.

Parramatta and Penrith are big enough - are they not suburban grounds - it's who you know. Need a new stadium in the south West if anywhere - I would pump for Liverpool.

He says sport has to pay it's own way - Idiot. Does that mean that netball, hockey, swimming, athletics, oh! and don't forget Shute Shield etc. are all finished - if not, they will be when he moves them all to these big arenas. They have to pay there way or is he just targeting the NRL. What is good for one is good for all sports.

Just see it now - the Warringah Rats v University at ANZ - the atmosphere of 15 people and a dog would be sensational.

Wake up to yourself Sports Minister? You and your government are there to give the people what they want, not what you in your infinite wisdom think they should have.

Such arrogance! and Robbie thought Shame Hayne was arrogant.
 
@mike said:
It's only a matter of 'when' not 'if' the likes of Leichhardt Oval are abandoned as grounds where you go to watch NRL matches. Regardless of if we as individuals like it or not the future is large stadiums. We need to grow and that means trying to fill large stadiums of at least 45,000+ capacity.

It's the future, so let's move on and do it. Don't hold back the game by hanging on to grounds that belong in an era that past by a few decades ago. It's time to move and look forward not back.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_

I have made no secret in the fact I think all the tigers games should be played out of ANZ, every thing changes we watch all the games on large TV 's and in HD mostly with no adds , ANZ stadium is in the heart of the city with memberships free transportation by train , plenty of acces to car parking , good quality food with discount for members ,great sound system ,free wi fi, good amenities and get 100k+ per game ….that is 1.2mill a season just to roll up .
Some of us see the value in this others do not ..some of us support the club and become members and as members want value for money ,some of us have family's that want good seating access .then on the other side other than being a bit closer to the game the other offers little else but that is my view others have there's .
 
Ink , you are on the money , people will vote with there feet, old grounds with 13 to 15 thousand is excellent , stadium with the same is lifeless
 
@andrew 474 said:
Ink , you are on the money , people will vote with there feet, old grounds with 13 to 15 thousand is excellent , stadium with the same is lifeless

People are voting with there feet. Crowds are often poor at these suburban grounds. The maximum we can ever get is 20,000\. That's it that's the limit and it's stunted, I would much rather be trying to fill a 45,000 size stadium than a 20,000 size ground. Again people have voted with there feet, we can't even reach 10,000 members.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_
 
@andrew 474 said:
Ink , you are on the money , people will vote with there feet, old grounds with 13 to 15 thousand is excellent , stadium with the same is lifeless

So what happens when membership goes over 20 thousand , the sign goes up outside the Ground TOUGH LUCK TRY NEXT GAME now this is defiantly in the best interest of the game .
 
I'm a director of a small club in Western Sydney , most club memberships have fallen , even clubs offering $ 2 membership , a free beer on your birthday , free beer , coffee and cake at Xmas plus free raffle tickets etc our tab is only having one third of the people in it on a Saturday , a lot has to do with betting on iPads from home , watching footy or races on your big screen , drinking as much as you like no driving home , ordering a pizza around half time delivered to your door , I think die hart fans go to the games and that means thousands of club supporters are on the lounge watching , you won't get 45 thousand tiger supporters at each game unless we are on top of the comp all the time
 
The only way that having three grounds in Sydney would work is if there were only three teams in Sydney. If a team doesn't have a dedicated home ground it is at a significant disadvantage.
 
@MacDougall said:
The only way that having three grounds in Sydney would work is if there were only three teams in Sydney. If a team doesn't have a dedicated home ground it is at a significant disadvantage.

Yeah its really holding back the dogs and souths. You can dig your heals into the 1980's but the better clubs are moving forward and as usual we get left lagging well behind.
 
@andrew 474 said:
I'm a director of a small club in Western Sydney , most club memberships have fallen , even clubs offering $ 2 membership , a free beer on your birthday , free beer , coffee and cake at Xmas plus free raffle tickets etc our tab is only having one third of the people in it on a Saturday , a lot has to do with betting on iPads from home , watching footy or races on your big screen , drinking as much as you like no driving home , ordering a pizza around half time delivered to your door , I think die hart fans go to the games and that means thousands of club supporters are on the lounge watching , you won't get 45 thousand tiger supporters at each game unless we are on top of the comp all the time

What a defeatist attitude. We will get 45,000 and more if the environment is right. If we are stuck with less than 10,000 members then we might as well give up now. The future is large stadiums with good facilities. We can fill them.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_
 
@mike said:
@innsaneink said:
So if the NRL & the State Govt propose moves that fans arent happy with, and those fans vote with their feet…its the fans holding the game back?

They keep saying this is a business, and the game and where its played is the product.
They have to make the product appealing...this wont appeal to many, and theyll take their business elsewhere

**I disagree. It won't appeal to some and that's the issue. Better facilities will appeal to a lot more**. IMO I believe the fact that we have 3 home grounds, 2 of which are sub-standard suburban grounds, hurts our membership numbers. Time to move on and grow.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_

I guess you missed the poll from the article I included in the OP where 80% disagree with this.

I see the reasoning for it, but Im not sure our game is right for it.
It might work for other codes, in other states…but I dont think its our fit. Our game, Its built on tribalism, the working class game...thats its foundations.
You take that away youre left with some corporates who are there for other reasons...the very essence that made the game what is is will finally be lost.
 
@MacDougall said:
The only way that having three grounds in Sydney would work is if there were only three teams in Sydney. If a team doesn't have a dedicated home ground it is at a significant disadvantage.

The article left the major part out ..the NRL do not want suburban grounds ,the reasoning behind 3 grounds in Sydney is all teams will select what ground they will play out off ,that is the strategy moving forward.
 
@innsaneink said:
@mike said:
@innsaneink said:
So if the NRL & the State Govt propose moves that fans arent happy with, and those fans vote with their feet…its the fans holding the game back?

They keep saying this is a business, and the game and where its played is the product.
They have to make the product appealing...this wont appeal to many, and theyll take their business elsewhere

**I disagree. It won't appeal to some and that's the issue. Better facilities will appeal to a lot more**. IMO I believe the fact that we have 3 home grounds, 2 of which are sub-standard suburban grounds, hurts our membership numbers. Time to move on and grow.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_

I guess you missed the poll from the article I included in the OP where 80% disagree with this.

I see the reasoning for it, but Im not sure our game is right for it.
It might work for other codes, in other states…but I dont think its our fit. Our game, Its built on tribalism, the working class game...thats its foundations.
You take that away youre left with some corporates who are there for other reasons...the very essence that made the game what is is will finally be lost.

I didn't miss the poll. Polls like this mean nothing, bums on seats is what counts. What we are doing now is not working and hasn't for a long time. It's time to change. Keep doing the same thing as we have been and expecting different results is insanity personified. It's time to look forward and see what can be done, not look back and wish it was different but do nothing about it.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_
 
A poll of 1400 really isn't a decent sample. esp. as its almost certaing skewed because most of those are the rusted on fans who aren;t what the change is aimed at. Yes, this sort of move would probably lose some people - but the medium to long term aim is to gain a lot more support from those that currently aren't interested.
With only 2 or 3 grounds you might also find that there's a lot more 'double header' type fixtures. esp on Saturday or Sunday arvo/ evening. & maybe friday's if the ch9/broncos/friday farce can ever be broken. I remember going to a double header at Homebush years ago (it was that long ago that tezza was playing for us and either we played the dogs or they were in the other game). It was great fun. One game where you could just relax and enjoy watching the footy & the other where you really care about the outcome. & because there are effectively two crowds the crowd was really good sized and the atmosphere was great. Play two games of 20s then 2 games of 1sts and you can make a whole day of it if you want to OR just turn up to your game.
Tribalism will survive the move to bigger grounds - and it means the facilities for the tribes are far better.
 
We need a purpose built rectangular stadium like the world cup ones with steep seating setup to get fans closer to action

Anz is pathetic. You have to look at big screen half of the time as your so far away from action

Afl pricked got their way and how many times a year is it used now for oval sports ?
 
Back
Top