@balmain-boy said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085517) said:
Holy c**p some fools lack basic year 10 comprehension skills.
At no point have the club said the door is closed.
At no point have the club confirmed any issues with Latrell or his actions, only those of his management.
At no point did the club confirm that Mitchell out of the blue decided not to show up to yesterday's meeting.
Trusting some c**p over written by a muppet working for the telemurdoch over the clear and direct quotes from our chairperson?
Or choosing to ignore how twice, not once but twice, in Pascoe's original statement did he reference they would be happy to pick up discussions if Latrell wanted to.
The only quotes in that article from Madge are about commitment, and that clear and simple. He wants all players that join the club to be committed to one another and the club's cause. He's publicly spelled that out. Of course Mitchell hasn't committed to the club yet, and Madge is making it clear that if Mitchell wants to join he has to be fully committed.
The reason Latrell hasn't committed may be because he's not interested, or because he simply wants to consider all his options before he commits to anyone. If it's the later, that's fair enough, and going from Lee's interview last night i think that's where things stand.
The problem is there aren't any other options at the moment. Just us, hence all the stalling and trying to generate offers. But essentially, no club can offer as much money as we have, and no club can guarantee him fullback spot due to having recently signed incumbents in the position already. There may be no other options that arise, maybe a few players get offloaded and it becomes more possible but either way he needs to decide in the next week or so. Waiting until January would be a joke.