Lee & JP finally lose the confidence of the Board??

Vicious said:
Again if what you are stating is factual, it’s very hard to disagree with your opinion.
But isn’t this independent review basing their findings off conversations with journalists with agendas, disgruntled ex employees and podcasters who are more interested in sipping lattes than actually watching football games ?
Click to expand...
I’ve never had a latte in my life 🤣
 
Magpie_Magic said:
Maybe I should've replied earlier.

Read another post of yours on that you stated from memory that Barnier intervied you and your podcast partner for 5 hours?


Now people talk about an independent review without a predetermined outcome without preconditions but it doesn't sound like this is the case.

For starters why should your opinion be sought? Your only stated intention was for anindependent review of the club. Sounds like if you were interviewed your opinions re the direction of the club be sought. Don't think you made that clear prior to people signing your petition. Secondly, you and your podcast partner are only two of many supporters......why shouldn't other fans opinions be sought including those who didn't sign the petition?

Secondly you mentioned in another post that all aspects of the club are poor.

This is clearly not the case, especially since the club is performing well financially as well in marketing and laterly with the COE.

I read about O'Farrell and Coates. Why will they bring success on the field for the club.....and perhaps the club will loose valuable sponsorships.


Sounds a bit like a everything has been predetermined.
Click to expand...

I think most people's focus has been to blow up the current structure and have not put much thought to the scenario where the change is even worse.

If they are not careful could be the final blow for the club.

By the sound of the article the new candidates were made up by Lee. Hopefully they get very good people in these new positions.
 
tony soprano said:
I think most people's focus has been to blow up the current structure and have not put much thought to the scenario where the change is even worse.

If they are not careful could be the final blow for the club.

By the sound of the article the new candidates were made up by Lee. Hopefully they get very good people in these new positions.
Click to expand...
Thats what I thought.

There are genuine people plus tools and fools who by doing this could bring ruin to the club....some are probably working for others to help them hopefully pick up the scraps.
 
Kaito said:
Mate of mine growing up in the 90's was a bear,
huge fan. Took me to North Sydney Oval once
with his mum, it was a magical afternoon
Snide. Watching reserve grade play before, warm
ups outside the oval, that big fig tree, amazing
Click to expand...
Loved going to Balmain away games there mate!

My favourite was this one in Round 16, 1988 - and a rare Saturday ABC TV live game.

It was also cold, grey and very windy so bugger all crowd was there aside from the diehards

NSWRL 1988 Winfield Cup - Round 16 - North Sydney Bears 20 lost to Balmain Tigers 30 - RLP

Match info page for the North Sydney Bears vs. Balmain Tigers game in Round 16 of the 1988 NSWRL season. Tigers won 30 to 20 at North Sydney Oval.
www.rugbyleagueproject.org www.rugbyleagueproject.org

This was also the famous game that the great Garry Jack got smacked in the mouth in the in-goal and lost three teeth - before minutes later taking a 50 metre plus goal-line drop out from Norths and leaving them grasping as he burnt the defence on the left flank all the way for one of the best solo tries of all time!!

He went back to his in-goal and I had no idea what he was doing crouching over then - but he was looking for his missing teeth in case the dentist could re-implant them.

Jimmy is still tough as nails and was the fiercest competitor!

Having said that - Mark Graham who was the captain of the Bears and one of NZ's finest does not get enough recognition!
 
Magpie_Magic said:
Maybe I should've replied earlier.

Read another post of yours on that you stted from memory that Barnier intervied you and your podcast partner for 5 hours?


Now people talk about an independent review without a predetermined outcome without preconditions but it doesn't sound like this os the case.

For starters why should your opinion be sought? Your only stated intention was for anindependent review of the club. Sounds like if you were interviewed your opinions re the direction of the club be sought. Don't think you made that clear prior to people signing your petition. Secondly, you and your podcast partner are only two of many supporters......why shouldn't other fans opinions be sought including those who didn't sign the petition?

Secondly you mentioned in another post that all aspects of the club are poor.

This is clearly not the case, especially since the club is performing well financially as well in marketing and laterly with the COE.

I read about O'Farrel and Coates. Why will they bring success on the field for the club.....and perhaps the club will loose valuable sponsorships.


Sounds a bit like a everything has been predetermined.
Click to expand...
Other fan opinions were gathered, I didn't seek to be interviewed for the review but was asked to. I was actually unsure as to whether to do it or not, but decided to give my opinion from a fans perspective. My opinion is as valid as any other fans.

I have no idea what I'm O'Farrel and Coates will bring, that is not my role. I have no idea if they have even been approached or not.

I have no idea how well the club is performing financially, I think we do a terrible job with our marketing and our social media engagement is going backwards quickly.

If we loose a sponsor due a change in leadership then to me that highlights the conflict of interest that we have allowed to exist.

Hopefully I satisfactory answered your enquiries.
 
cochise said:
Other fan opinions were gathered, I didn't seek to be interviewed for the review but was asked to. I was actually unsure as to whether to do it or not, but decided to give my opinion from a fans perspective. My opinion is as valid as any other fans.
Click to expand...
Why weren't fans approached that didn't sign your petition. Besides, your aim was to get an independent review done.

cochise said:
I have no idea what I'm O'Farrel and Coates will bring, that is not my role. I have no idea if they have even been approached or not.

I have no idea how well the club is performing financially, I think we do a terrible job with our marketing and our social media engagement is going backwards quickly.
Click to expand...
Thats not true especially regarding financial and marketing.
cochise said:
If we loose a sponsor due a change in leadership then to me that highlights the conflict of interest that we have allowed to exist.
Click to expand...

Any sponsorship loss is a loss.
cochise said:
Hopefully I satisfactory answered your enquiries.
Click to expand...
Yeah,

Your honesty is appreciated.

Don't agree with your takes.
 
Vicious said:
Again if what you are stating is factual, it’s very hard to disagree with your opinion.
But isn’t this independent review basing their findings off conversations with journalists with agendas, disgruntled ex employees and podcasters who are more interested in sipping lattes than actually watching football games ?
Click to expand...
Winning games = sipping lattes???

No good coffee in Shitsville???

Can you READ - it is about corporate governance pisant!

Are you just a moron or something more sinister?
 
Magpie_Magic said:
Why weren't fans approached that didn't sign your petition. Besides, your aim was to get an independent review done.


Thats not true especially regarding financial and marketing.


Any sponsorship loss is a loss.

Yeah,

Your honesty is appreciated.

Don't agree with your takes.
Click to expand...
Fans who didn't sign were interviewed as well.

The Holman Barnes Group has been very happy with how we went about this, they are aware we aren't looking to blow the place up but improve how the club runs.

It was very important to us to be respectful to the club and the owners.

I believe there are major issues in our club, I don't fully understand what they are as I am outside the club looking in. That is why we asked for an independent review.

I am very confident that the results of the review were not predetermined.
 
Magpie_Magic said:
Maybe I should've replied earlier.

Read another post of yours on that you stated from memory that Barnier intervied you and your podcast partner for 5 hours?


Now people talk about an independent review without a predetermined outcome without preconditions but it doesn't sound like this is the case.

For starters why should your opinion be sought? Your only stated intention was for anindependent review of the club. Sounds like if you were interviewed your opinions re the direction of the club be sought. Don't think you made that clear prior to people signing your petition. Secondly, you and your podcast partner are only two of many supporters......why shouldn't other fans opinions be sought including those who didn't sign the petition?

Secondly you mentioned in another post that all aspects of the club are poor.

This is clearly not the case, especially since the club is performing well financially as well in marketing and laterly with the COE.

I read about O'Farrell and Coates. Why will they bring success on the field for the club.....and perhaps the club will loose valuable sponsorships.


Sounds a bit like a everything has been predetermined.
Click to expand...
Dunce!

BLOCKED!!!
 
cochise said:
Fans who didn't sign were interviewed as well.

The Holman Barnes Group has been very happy with how we went about this, they are aware we aren't looking to blow the place up but improve how the club runs.

It was very important to us to be respectful to the club and the owners.

I believe there are major issues in our club, I don't fully understand what they are as I am outside the club looking in. That is why we asked for an independent review.

I am very confident that the results of the review were not predetermined.
Click to expand...
Why be respectful???

They deserve to feel the true contempt from fans and ex-players/coaches etc
 
cochise said:
Fans who didn't sign were interviewed as well.

The Holman Barnes Group has been very happy with how we went about this, they are aware we aren't looking to blow the place up but improve how the club runs.

It was very important to us to be respectful to the club and the owners.

I believe there are major issues in our club, I don't fully understand what they are as I am outside the club looking in. That is why we asked for an independent review.

I am very confident that the results of the review were not predetermined.
Click to expand...
Thats fine that's your view and I agree something must be done.

But a 5 hour interview. I mean yours was probably the longest and for all intents and purposes you convened the petition with an open mind .....and you state in this post you don't know what the problems are. I'm guessing you passed on alot of your views. Perhaps I and others may have different ones.....but we were not sought.

Look, a public degradation of a club in this way increases the risks of further financial and sponsorship loss and possibly a spiral to ruination.

Don't ask me how I know
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 453 (members: 40, guests: 413)
Back
Top