**live game feed** vs the Eels

[hobbo1]

Madge saying blore sinbin wrong

Well it was. A ridiculous decision.

If Blore’s was 10 in the bin Sivo should’ve been sent off ..

Yeah we played like crap but I’m losing interest in watching the games in general..
My young bloke plays the game but he’s given up watching ..
Well done V’landys ?

 

[Needaname]

I jist want the boys to make the finals n knock out Gutho, he is my most disliked player in the NRL such a show pony n full of arrogance. Bring back the biff n sit his ass down n out

They don’t need to make the finals to do that. They had 80mins today to take him out ‘legally that is’ but no one stood up. From the moment he scored his first try and gave it Laurie on the ground he should have been creamed. Well we couldn’t do what was needed. Let’s hope the Panthers put them back in their place next week!

 

[Snake]

Madge saying blore sinbin wrong

Madge needs spec savers

The action had no affect whatsoever on the play that ensued...

There the rules sorry ..brain dead Blore.

 

[Snake]

Madge saying blore sinbin wrong

Madge needs spec savers

In context it was a bs call
The rules are up S creek

Have to stop making excuses for moronic plays there the rules.

 

[hobbo1]

Madge saying blore sinbin wrong

Madge needs spec savers

In context it was a bs call
The rules are up S creek

Have to stop making excuses for moronic plays there the rules.

Moronic rules as well ...
Did the jersey grab change the outcome ..?
NO ..
This is why the games going to crap !

 

[rustycage]

We had to do a million more tackles in the the first half thanks to some horrendous referring and it took s its toll. If we were given a go by the pea blower we might have got close. The ref has zero feel for a game and that’s now two weeks in a row.
The six again lottery must be without doubt the biggest negative in the game. The Storm game is going to be harder, must maybe we might get a ref who gives both teams ago

We concede 40 every time we play a decent team. It’s not refereeing

Atkins didn’t help Parra could have been pinged a number of times but he elected to ignore

Good teams defend for 6 tackles when something goes against them.

8 set re-starts or whatever it was makes life hard. Penalising a team relentlessly in the first half takes out the energy required later in the game. It's a simple way for a ref to manage a result. Numbers can be adjusted later to even the equation somewhat. Stuff like giving repeat sets on zero tackle or multiple penalties one after the other late in a game are a classic example. We may not have been (probably weren't) good enough to win. But we certainly weren't given the opportunity to compete as we might have been if we were a higher ranked team in the ref and video refs eyes.
Why Moses wasn't sent to the bin for high contact is an absolute joke.

 

[JC99]

Seyfarth played very well


Are you also the one singling Liddle out as worst on ground ? If so, please remove your Twitter because it’s embarrassing calling you a knowledgeable fan... he was average and Seyfarth whilst good, was nothing special...

You still don’t see the issue here.

He wasn't worst on ground, Walters was. Liddle was pretty bad today though and Seyfarth was our best forward. Not everyone has to agree on everything bud so I won't be removing anything, cheers ??

 

[BAGNF05]

We had to do a million more tackles in the the first half thanks to some horrendous referring and it took s its toll. If we were given a go by the pea blower we might have got close. The ref has zero feel for a game and that’s now two weeks in a row.
The six again lottery must be without doubt the biggest negative in the game. The Storm game is going to be harder, must maybe we might get a ref who gives both teams ago

We concede 40 every time we play a decent team. It’s not refereeing

Atkins didn’t help Parra could have been pinged a number of times but he elected to ignore

Good teams defend for 6 tackles when something goes against them.

8 set re-starts or whatever it was makes life hard. Penalising a team relentlessly in the first half takes out the energy required later in the game. It's a simple way for a ref to manage a result. Numbers can be adjusted later to even the equation somewhat. Stuff like giving repeat sets on zero tackle or multiple penalties one after the other late in a game are a classic example. We may not have been (probably weren't) good enough to win. But we certainly weren't given the opportunity to compete as we might have been if we were a higher ranked team in the ref and video refs eyes.
Why Moses wasn't sent to the bin for high contact is an absolute joke.

Simple fix. Run harder and make your tackles.

 

[rustycage]

We had to do a million more tackles in the the first half thanks to some horrendous referring and it took s its toll. If we were given a go by the pea blower we might have got close. The ref has zero feel for a game and that’s now two weeks in a row.
The six again lottery must be without doubt the biggest negative in the game. The Storm game is going to be harder, must maybe we might get a ref who gives both teams ago

We concede 40 every time we play a decent team. It’s not refereeing

Atkins didn’t help Parra could have been pinged a number of times but he elected to ignore

Good teams defend for 6 tackles when something goes against them.

8 set re-starts or whatever it was makes life hard. Penalising a team relentlessly in the first half takes out the energy required later in the game. It's a simple way for a ref to manage a result. Numbers can be adjusted later to even the equation somewhat. Stuff like giving repeat sets on zero tackle or multiple penalties one after the other late in a game are a classic example. We may not have been (probably weren't) good enough to win. But we certainly weren't given the opportunity to compete as we might have been if we were a higher ranked team in the ref and video refs eyes.
Why Moses wasn't sent to the bin for high contact is an absolute joke.

Simple fix. Run harder and make your tackles.

Lol....ok

 

[southerntiger]

Madge saying blore sinbin wrong

Madge needs spec savers

He didn’t say that. He said, in effect, the penalty was disproportionate given the penalty given for the 17 head high tackles by Parra.

He was right.

 

[BAGNF05]

We had to do a million more tackles in the the first half thanks to some horrendous referring and it took s its toll. If we were given a go by the pea blower we might have got close. The ref has zero feel for a game and that’s now two weeks in a row.
The six again lottery must be without doubt the biggest negative in the game. The Storm game is going to be harder, must maybe we might get a ref who gives both teams ago

We concede 40 every time we play a decent team. It’s not refereeing

Atkins didn’t help Parra could have been pinged a number of times but he elected to ignore

Good teams defend for 6 tackles when something goes against them.

8 set re-starts or whatever it was makes life hard. Penalising a team relentlessly in the first half takes out the energy required later in the game. It's a simple way for a ref to manage a result. Numbers can be adjusted later to even the equation somewhat. Stuff like giving repeat sets on zero tackle or multiple penalties one after the other late in a game are a classic example. We may not have been (probably weren't) good enough to win. But we certainly weren't given the opportunity to compete as we might have been if we were a higher ranked team in the ref and video refs eyes.
Why Moses wasn't sent to the bin for high contact is an absolute joke.

Simple fix. Run harder and make your tackles.

Lol....ok

Ask any neutral supporter, it’s that obvious our forwards got rolled in the first half. That leads to repeat sets because they are rolling. We handed them all the momentum with stupid school boy errors. Conceding 40 is on us.

 

[hobbo1]

We had to do a million more tackles in the the first half thanks to some horrendous referring and it took s its toll. If we were given a go by the pea blower we might have got close. The ref has zero feel for a game and that’s now two weeks in a row.
The six again lottery must be without doubt the biggest negative in the game. The Storm game is going to be harder, must maybe we might get a ref who gives both teams ago

We concede 40 every time we play a decent team. It’s not refereeing

Atkins didn’t help Parra could have been pinged a number of times but he elected to ignore

Good teams defend for 6 tackles when something goes against them.

8 set re-starts or whatever it was makes life hard. Penalising a team relentlessly in the first half takes out the energy required later in the game. It's a simple way for a ref to manage a result. Numbers can be adjusted later to even the equation somewhat. Stuff like giving repeat sets on zero tackle or multiple penalties one after the other late in a game are a classic example. We may not have been (probably weren't) good enough to win. But we certainly weren't given the opportunity to compete as we might have been if we were a higher ranked team in the ref and video refs eyes.
Why Moses wasn't sent to the bin for high contact is an absolute joke.

Simple fix. Run harder and make your tackles.

Lol....ok

Ask any neutral supporter, it’s that obvious our forwards got rolled in the first half. That leads to repeat sets because they are rolling. We handed them all the momentum with stupid school boy errors. Conceding 40 is on us.

Our pack got bashed but it doesn’t help when you’re getting shafted by the officials ..

 

[kratos]

Tom Amone stripped the ball off RCG and was told to give him the ball back.
If that doesn’t tell you all you need to know about this refereeing performance nothing will.

What min was this?

 

[tigerap]

Picking Walters was a mistake….

 

[BAGNF05]

We had to do a million more tackles in the the first half thanks to some horrendous referring and it took s its toll. If we were given a go by the pea blower we might have got close. The ref has zero feel for a game and that’s now two weeks in a row.
The six again lottery must be without doubt the biggest negative in the game. The Storm game is going to be harder, must maybe we might get a ref who gives both teams ago

We concede 40 every time we play a decent team. It’s not refereeing

Atkins didn’t help Parra could have been pinged a number of times but he elected to ignore

Good teams defend for 6 tackles when something goes against them.

8 set re-starts or whatever it was makes life hard. Penalising a team relentlessly in the first half takes out the energy required later in the game. It's a simple way for a ref to manage a result. Numbers can be adjusted later to even the equation somewhat. Stuff like giving repeat sets on zero tackle or multiple penalties one after the other late in a game are a classic example. We may not have been (probably weren't) good enough to win. But we certainly weren't given the opportunity to compete as we might have been if we were a higher ranked team in the ref and video refs eyes.
Why Moses wasn't sent to the bin for high contact is an absolute joke.

Simple fix. Run harder and make your tackles.

Lol....ok

Ask any neutral supporter, it’s that obvious our forwards got rolled in the first half. That leads to repeat sets because they are rolling. We handed them all the momentum with stupid school boy errors. Conceding 40 is on us.

Our pack got bashed but it doesn’t help when you’re getting shafted by the officials ..

The repeat sets are frustrating as all hell but their big boys were rolling and we’re just doing all we can to slow them down. The way to stop it is to send a second rower up and sit one of them back 5 metres on their chaminda. None of our players are capable.

 

[tigerap]

Tom Amone stripped the ball off RCG and was told to give him the ball back.
If that doesn’t tell you all you need to know about this refereeing performance nothing will.

What min was this?

The ref Atkins was so biased against Tigers

 

[WT2K]

Tom Amone stripped the ball off RCG and was told to give him the ball back.
If that doesn’t tell you all you need to know about this refereeing performance nothing will.

What min was this?

The ref Atkins was so biased against Tigers

Looks happy here too https://twitter.com/CastTiger/status/1403986852806238214?s=19

 

[innsaneink]

Tom Amone stripped the ball off RCG and was told to give him the ball back.
If that doesn’t tell you all you need to know about this refereeing performance nothing will.

What min was this?

The ref Atkins was so biased against Tigers


 

[Harvey]

We had to do a million more tackles in the the first half thanks to some horrendous referring and it took s its toll. If we were given a go by the pea blower we might have got close. The ref has zero feel for a game and that’s now two weeks in a row.
The six again lottery must be without doubt the biggest negative in the game. The Storm game is going to be harder, must maybe we might get a ref who gives both teams ago

We concede 40 every time we play a decent team. It’s not refereeing

Atkins didn’t help Parra could have been pinged a number of times but he elected to ignore

Good teams defend for 6 tackles when something goes against them.

8 set re-starts or whatever it was makes life hard. Penalising a team relentlessly in the first half takes out the energy required later in the game. It's a simple way for a ref to manage a result. Numbers can be adjusted later to even the equation somewhat. Stuff like giving repeat sets on zero tackle or multiple penalties one after the other late in a game are a classic example. We may not have been (probably weren't) good enough to win. But we certainly weren't given the opportunity to compete as we might have been if we were a higher ranked team in the ref and video refs eyes.
Why Moses wasn't sent to the bin for high contact is an absolute joke.

I would like to know the 6 again count under Atkins. He seems to flog us for nothing that the opposition is not doing