Luke Brooks - Mega Thread

https://www.triplem.com.au/story/ready-s-mail-the-big-reason-why-luke-brooks-could-stay-at-the-tigers-189676?fbclid=IwAR3yklcdXd4zMh6l4bJJwGNOqdG_HFPJeWELtIWqOW6FU0CXZx09zDVUz3Y

Ready weighs in...
 
@geo said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502305) said:
https://www.triplem.com.au/story/ready-s-mail-the-big-reason-why-luke-brooks-could-stay-at-the-tigers-189676?fbclid=IwAR3yklcdXd4zMh6l4bJJwGNOqdG_HFPJeWELtIWqOW6FU0CXZx09zDVUz3Y

Ready weighs in...

Sounds like Ready has been reading (the more sensible posts on ) the forum.
 
@newtown said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1502304) said:
Frustrated Tigers fed up with Luke Brooks speculation
Christian Nicolussi
By Christian Nicolussi
November 4, 2021 — 7.49pm

Frustrated Wests Tigers officials declared on Thursday night they were fed up with speculation Luke Brooks was heading to Newcastle to replace Mitchell Pearce, with the No.7 having assured them it would not be happening.

Less than two weeks after new director of football Tim Sheens made it clear from England the halfback would be staying put until at least the end of 2023, talk of Brooks heading to the Hunter cranked into overdrive with four separate news reports suggesting he was all but a done deal.

Any comments?
 
Has any team ever fought so hard to retain someone who has delivered so little for so long? We’re acting like he’s Munster or Cleary.
 
@newtown said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502308) said:
@newtown said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1502304) said:
Frustrated Tigers fed up with Luke Brooks speculation
Christian Nicolussi
By Christian Nicolussi
November 4, 2021 — 7.49pm

Frustrated Wests Tigers officials declared on Thursday night they were fed up with speculation Luke Brooks was heading to Newcastle to replace Mitchell Pearce, with the No.7 having assured them it would not be happening.

Less than two weeks after new director of football Tim Sheens made it clear from England the halfback would be staying put until at least the end of 2023, talk of Brooks heading to the Hunter cranked into overdrive with four separate news reports suggesting he was all but a done deal.

Any comments?

Pretty clear Brooks wants out and his manager is assisting.
 
We really want you to stay Luke as injures have put us in a spot … this is the thinking that has led to 10 yrs of failure . Brooks does not fit anymore get of your butts let the guy leave if he wants and do your job and find someone that does !! If he wants to stay all well and good but the injury excuse is lame in the extreme even for this club !
 
@snake said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502320) said:
We really want you to stay Luke as injures have put us in a spot … this is the thinking that has led to 10 yrs of failure . Brooks does not fit anymore get of your butts let the guy leave if he wants and do your job and find someone that does !! If he wants to stay all well and good but the injury excuse is lame in the extreme even for this club !

Bit hard when everyone better is under contract. Releasing him for nothing is pointless.
 
The real question is why the Knights released Pearce without first having a replacement in situ?

All this clamouring smacks of desperation to try and free up a halfback prior to the start of the year, aided by the vendettas of a few on this forum and articles with few facts online and in the media.
 
@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502321) said:
@snake said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502320) said:
We really want you to stay Luke as injures have put us in a spot … this is the thinking that has led to 10 yrs of failure . Brooks does not fit anymore get of your butts let the guy leave if he wants and do your job and find someone that does !! If he wants to stay all well and good but the injury excuse is lame in the extreme even for this club !

Bit hard when everyone better is under contract. Releasing him for nothing is pointless.

He's under contract too, so is Pearce... they don't seem to mean much these days.
None of us knows what's really going on behind the scenes here - but there's plenty of noise.
 
I'd expect if this has any legs the club would be looking for a short term half replacement, and it wouldn't happen until that's sorted.

Could end up with another Harry Grant style loan deal. Who's a good half that isn't getting a look in?

The names that come to my mind aren't exactly jaw dropping: Return of Benji, Widdop (in Australia atm), Corey Norman, Lachlan Lam, maybe even Maloney. Volkman was touted here as a big talent on here at the Roosters currently who is no hope of getting a look in.
 
@weststigerman said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502324) said:
I'd expect if this has any legs the club would be looking for a short term half replacement, and it wouldn't happen until that's sorted.

Could end up with another Harry Grant style loan deal. Who's a good half that isn't getting a look in?

The names that come to my mind aren't exactly jaw dropping: Return of Benji, Widdop (in Australia atm), Corey Norman, Lachlan Lam, maybe even Maloney. Volkman was touted here as a big talent on here at the Roosters currently who is no hope of getting a look in.

Keep the scapegoat
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502322) said:
The real question is why the Knights released Pearce without first having a replacement in situ?

All this clamouring smacks of desperation to try and free up a halfback prior to the start of the year, aided by the vendettas of a few on this forum and articles with few facts online and in the media.

bugger the knights don't release Brooks let them run with Tex hoy or something.
Or loan Madden to the knights for experience
 
Will today be the day? half the forum celebrating like it’s 2005 and the other half in mourning.

Doesn’t matter what Luke does this is the only guaranteed outcome.
 
@chicken_faced_killa said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502330) said:
Will today be the day? half the forum celebrating like it’s 2005 and the other half in mourning.

Doesn’t matter what Luke does this is the only guaranteed outcome.

Jock madden vs 2005 hmmmm
 
@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502325) said:
@weststigerman said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502324) said:
I'd expect if this has any legs the club would be looking for a short term half replacement, and it wouldn't happen until that's sorted.

Could end up with another Harry Grant style loan deal. Who's a good half that isn't getting a look in?

The names that come to my mind aren't exactly jaw dropping: Return of Benji, Widdop (in Australia atm), Corey Norman, Lachlan Lam, maybe even Maloney. Volkman was touted here as a big talent on here at the Roosters currently who is no hope of getting a look in.

Keep the scapegoat

This is pretty funny. We definitely shouldn't let Brooks leave if we are paying a cent of his contract. He rarely gets injured. His defense is pretty good for a half. He can set up and score tries. He also has a decent kicking game. The problem is the guy isn't a top level NRL player and we need about 5 of those players added to our team.
 
@chicken_faced_killa said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502330) said:
Will today be the day? half the forum celebrating like it’s 2005 and the other half in mourning.

Doesn’t matter what Luke does this is the only guaranteed outcome.

I honestly don't care. I think Brooks might be better off leaving and I don't think we will miss him post this season. At the same time we need him at least for the start of the season. We also don't know how Hastings will perform or how Douiehi will perform when he comes back.
 
@earl said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502333) said:
@chicken_faced_killa said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502330) said:
Will today be the day? half the forum celebrating like it’s 2005 and the other half in mourning.

Doesn’t matter what Luke does this is the only guaranteed outcome.

I honestly don't care. I think Brooks might be better off leaving and I don't think we will miss him post this season. At the same time we need him at least for the start of the season. We also don't know how Hastings will perform or how Douiehi will perform when he comes back.

I could live with him going if the club would show some cahunas and negotiate a favourable player in return. I think it’s best for Brooks to play with a better forward pack but why just strengthen an opponent? We can’t spend the million plus we have now. Shambles.
 
@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502336) said:
@earl said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502333) said:
@chicken_faced_killa said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502330) said:
Will today be the day? half the forum celebrating like it’s 2005 and the other half in mourning.

Doesn’t matter what Luke does this is the only guaranteed outcome.

I honestly don't care. I think Brooks might be better off leaving and I don't think we will miss him post this season. At the same time we need him at least for the start of the season. We also don't know how Hastings will perform or how Douiehi will perform when he comes back.

I could live with him going if the club would show some cahunas and negotiate a favourable player in return. I think it’s best for Brooks to play with a better forward pack but why just strengthen an opponent? We can’t spend the million plus we have now. Shambles.

And it's only going to worsen with the Dophins coming into the competition.
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502337) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502336) said:
@earl said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502333) said:
@chicken_faced_killa said in [Luke Brooks Yes Or No](/post/1502330) said:
Will today be the day? half the forum celebrating like it’s 2005 and the other half in mourning.

Doesn’t matter what Luke does this is the only guaranteed outcome.

I honestly don't care. I think Brooks might be better off leaving and I don't think we will miss him post this season. At the same time we need him at least for the start of the season. We also don't know how Hastings will perform or how Douiehi will perform when he comes back.

I could live with him going if the club would show some cahunas and negotiate a favourable player in return. I think it’s best for Brooks to play with a better forward pack but why just strengthen an opponent? We can’t spend the million plus we have now. Shambles.

And it's only going to worsen with the Dophins coming into the competition.

Jock Madden. Soon to be 17th best halfback in the NRL.
 
Wait a minute..it just struck me..If Brooks is so rubbish why are Newy even interested..... Surely with Clifford , Crossland, Mann, Hoy even Pongo they can cover Pearce.. Didn't former WT jnr Camaroux go there too..
 
Back
Top