Luke Brooks

Status
Not open for further replies.
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162229) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162200) said:
So Brooks is the new Jennings now...
The 7 can be a role player. Sezer lastcyear was a role player in the Raiders team last year same as Townsend for Sharks.
Hindsiggt is a wonderful thing but looks like we let the wrong half go in Moses

Moses walked
Brooks was desperate as no other club would take him
If Jennings was a half he’d be luke Brooks

I am tired of correcting you in your hate for Brooks.

Other clubs did want him - Melbourne and the Dogs wanted him for a start.
 
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162469) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162452) said:
Again it's a case of us signing good players .....

But this is a team game and that team HAS to gel

Brooks doesn't gel with Reynolds or Marshall

Douehi doesn't gel with the style of Grant

And then we have the whole Huth , Seyfarth and Clark situation

Of the three Huth is easily the best of the game they play ...he doesn't get dominated in attack like the other two do ...and is better defensively

We still have no sting on our edges ...Lucy is a step in the right direction ..but we are using him as a 80 minute player ...he loses his effectiveness

Brooks and Garner looked like they were building some good combos last season ...where the hell has that gone

Joey has shown little from what we saw in the Warriors trial ...Mbye isn't getting quality ball in attacking situations

Talau looked good last night and hopefully he gets a chance to string some games together ....Nofoaluma is getting away from what makes him a good running winger ...he loses effectiveness when he changes direction ...he is far better off using some footwork at the line and try and get quicker play the balls

Many are saying we are 2-3 players away from a good side .....I don't think so ...many of these guys don't gel

We need to go back to the start ...show faith in Madge .....give him some latitude to build a good squad around some key signings

This squad is so far away from a premiership it's not funny in my opinion

You won’t get much of a chance to build anything if you change the team every second week

So Brooks get picked because we shouldn't change combinations .....

Brooks won't play to his strength Geo ...he won't lead the team .....he's had 7 seasons now

Tell me what spine gels .....and lets go with it for the next 15 rounds

My opinion the best spine that would gel was

1 Thompson
6 Douehi
7 Brooks
9 Grant

14 Marshall

Its the only one that all their strengths match up and should mix well
 
@Russell said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162483) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162229) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162200) said:
So Brooks is the new Jennings now...
The 7 can be a role player. Sezer lastcyear was a role player in the Raiders team last year same as Townsend for Sharks.
Hindsiggt is a wonderful thing but looks like we let the wrong half go in Moses

Moses walked
Brooks was desperate as no other club would take him
If Jennings was a half he’d be luke Brooks

I am tired of correcting you in your hate for Brooks.

Other clubs did want him - Melbourne and the Dogs wanted him for a start.

Sure they did ?
Got any substantial evidence to back up your claims ?

By the way I don’t hate anyone ..not even you !
Brooks is rubbish plain and simple and if Madge is fairdinkum he should hook him
 
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162489) said:
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162469) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162452) said:
Again it's a case of us signing good players .....

But this is a team game and that team HAS to gel

Brooks doesn't gel with Reynolds or Marshall

Douehi doesn't gel with the style of Grant

And then we have the whole Huth , Seyfarth and Clark situation

Of the three Huth is easily the best of the game they play ...he doesn't get dominated in attack like the other two do ...and is better defensively

We still have no sting on our edges ...Lucy is a step in the right direction ..but we are using him as a 80 minute player ...he loses his effectiveness

Brooks and Garner looked like they were building some good combos last season ...where the hell has that gone

Joey has shown little from what we saw in the Warriors trial ...Mbye isn't getting quality ball in attacking situations

Talau looked good last night and hopefully he gets a chance to string some games together ....Nofoaluma is getting away from what makes him a good running winger ...he loses effectiveness when he changes direction ...he is far better off using some footwork at the line and try and get quicker play the balls

Many are saying we are 2-3 players away from a good side .....I don't think so ...many of these guys don't gel

We need to go back to the start ...show faith in Madge .....give him some latitude to build a good squad around some key signings

This squad is so far away from a premiership it's not funny in my opinion

You won’t get much of a chance to build anything if you change the team every second week

So Brooks get picked because we shouldn't change combinations .....

Brooks won't play to his strength Geo ...he won't lead the team .....he's had 7 seasons now

Tell me what spine gels .....and lets go with it for the next 15 rounds

My opinion the best spine that would gel was

1 Thompson
6 Douehi
7 Brooks
9 Grant

14 Marshall

Its the only one that all their strengths match up and should mix well

That spine is worth a shot. Not convinced about Brooks though.
 
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162452) said:
Again it's a case of us signing good players .....

But this is a team game and that team HAS to gel

Brooks doesn't gel with Reynolds or Marshall

Douehi doesn't gel with the style of Grant

And then we have the whole Huth , Seyfarth and Clark situation

Of the three Huth is easily the best of the game they play ...he doesn't get dominated in attack like the other two do ...and is better defensively

We still have no sting on our edges ...Lucy is a step in the right direction ..but we are using him as a 80 minute player ...he loses his effectiveness

Brooks and Garner looked like they were building some good combos last season ...where the hell has that gone

Joey has shown little from what we saw in the Warriors trial ...Mbye isn't getting quality ball in attacking situations

Talau looked good last night and hopefully he gets a chance to string some games together ....Nofoaluma is getting away from what makes him a good running winger ...he loses effectiveness when he changes direction ...he is far better off using some footwork at the line and try and get quicker play the balls

Many are saying we are 2-3 players away from a good side .....I don't think so ...many of these guys don't gel

We need to go back to the start ...show faith in Madge .....give him some latitude to build a good squad around some key signings

This squad is so far away from a premiership it's not funny in my opinion


Yes it’s all about getting the right players to balance the team, we haven’t had a balanced side since 2011!

They all don’t have to be superstars either, however one or two real game breakers would be nice. CHN in the forwards and Munster in the backs would help turn this team into a Premiership threat.
 
@Russell said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162483) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162229) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162200) said:
So Brooks is the new Jennings now...
The 7 can be a role player. Sezer lastcyear was a role player in the Raiders team last year same as Townsend for Sharks.
Hindsiggt is a wonderful thing but looks like we let the wrong half go in Moses

Moses walked
Brooks was desperate as no other club would take him
If Jennings was a half he’d be luke Brooks

I am tired of correcting you in your hate for Brooks.

Other clubs did want him - Melbourne and the Dogs wanted him for a start.

Russ ....what 6 in the NRL is a good mix with Brooks in your opinion
 
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162494) said:
@Russell said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162483) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162229) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162200) said:
So Brooks is the new Jennings now...
The 7 can be a role player. Sezer lastcyear was a role player in the Raiders team last year same as Townsend for Sharks.
Hindsiggt is a wonderful thing but looks like we let the wrong half go in Moses

Moses walked
Brooks was desperate as no other club would take him
If Jennings was a half he’d be luke Brooks

I am tired of correcting you in your hate for Brooks.

Other clubs did want him - Melbourne and the Dogs wanted him for a start.

Russ ....what 6 in the NRL is a good mix with Brooks in your opinion

Munster..easy one..
 
@Spud_Murphy said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162493) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162452) said:
Again it's a case of us signing good players .....

But this is a team game and that team HAS to gel

Brooks doesn't gel with Reynolds or Marshall

Douehi doesn't gel with the style of Grant

And then we have the whole Huth , Seyfarth and Clark situation

Of the three Huth is easily the best of the game they play ...he doesn't get dominated in attack like the other two do ...and is better defensively

We still have no sting on our edges ...Lucy is a step in the right direction ..but we are using him as a 80 minute player ...he loses his effectiveness

Brooks and Garner looked like they were building some good combos last season ...where the hell has that gone

Joey has shown little from what we saw in the Warriors trial ...Mbye isn't getting quality ball in attacking situations

Talau looked good last night and hopefully he gets a chance to string some games together ....Nofoaluma is getting away from what makes him a good running winger ...he loses effectiveness when he changes direction ...he is far better off using some footwork at the line and try and get quicker play the balls

Many are saying we are 2-3 players away from a good side .....I don't think so ...many of these guys don't gel

We need to go back to the start ...show faith in Madge .....give him some latitude to build a good squad around some key signings

This squad is so far away from a premiership it's not funny in my opinion


Yes it’s all about getting the right players to balance the team, we haven’t had a balanced side since 2011!

They all don’t have to be superstars either, however one or two real game breakers would be nice. CHN in the forwards and Munster in the backs would help turn this team into a Premiership threat.

I don't even think Munster is the answer ...you add another running half and Brooks would go back further in his shell
 
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162495) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162494) said:
@Russell said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162483) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162229) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162200) said:
So Brooks is the new Jennings now...
The 7 can be a role player. Sezer lastcyear was a role player in the Raiders team last year same as Townsend for Sharks.
Hindsiggt is a wonderful thing but looks like we let the wrong half go in Moses

Moses walked
Brooks was desperate as no other club would take him
If Jennings was a half he’d be luke Brooks

I am tired of correcting you in your hate for Brooks.

Other clubs did want him - Melbourne and the Dogs wanted him for a start.

Russ ....what 6 in the NRL is a good mix with Brooks in your opinion

Munster..easy one..

No it wouldn't work ......Brooks would get even more muddled in his mind at his role
 
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162497) said:
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162495) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162494) said:
@Russell said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162483) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162229) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162200) said:
So Brooks is the new Jennings now...
The 7 can be a role player. Sezer lastcyear was a role player in the Raiders team last year same as Townsend for Sharks.
Hindsiggt is a wonderful thing but looks like we let the wrong half go in Moses

Moses walked
Brooks was desperate as no other club would take him
If Jennings was a half he’d be luke Brooks

I am tired of correcting you in your hate for Brooks.

Other clubs did want him - Melbourne and the Dogs wanted him for a start.

Russ ....what 6 in the NRL is a good mix with Brooks in your opinion

Munster..easy one..

No it wouldn't work ......Brooks would get even more muddled in his mind at his role

Have you watched the Storm this year..Munster does much much much more than just run..
 
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162499) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162497) said:
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162495) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162494) said:
@Russell said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162483) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162229) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162200) said:
So Brooks is the new Jennings now...
The 7 can be a role player. Sezer lastcyear was a role player in the Raiders team last year same as Townsend for Sharks.
Hindsiggt is a wonderful thing but looks like we let the wrong half go in Moses

Moses walked
Brooks was desperate as no other club would take him
If Jennings was a half he’d be luke Brooks

I am tired of correcting you in your hate for Brooks.

Other clubs did want him - Melbourne and the Dogs wanted him for a start.

Russ ....what 6 in the NRL is a good mix with Brooks in your opinion

Munster..easy one..

No it wouldn't work ......Brooks would get even more muddled in his mind at his role

Have you watched the Storm this year..Munster does much much much more than just run..

You don't need Brooks if you sign Munster ...you could get a far better half that would fit Munster's style

And you shoot yourself in the foot with the Munster argument .....if we need to get a player of Munsters ability ....Brooks isn't that good ...is he ??

Munster's strength is his running game ...Brooks only strength is his running game ...and he doesn't even have confidence in that

I'd hate to think what that would do to Brooks and his confidence
 
@mike said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162481) said:
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162469) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162452) said:
Again it's a case of us signing good players .....

But this is a team game and that team HAS to gel

Brooks doesn't gel with Reynolds or Marshall

Douehi doesn't gel with the style of Grant

And then we have the whole Huth , Seyfarth and Clark situation

Of the three Huth is easily the best of the game they play ...he doesn't get dominated in attack like the other two do ...and is better defensively

We still have no sting on our edges ...Lucy is a step in the right direction ..but we are using him as a 80 minute player ...he loses his effectiveness

Brooks and Garner looked like they were building some good combos last season ...where the hell has that gone

Joey has shown little from what we saw in the Warriors trial ...Mbye isn't getting quality ball in attacking situations

Talau looked good last night and hopefully he gets a chance to string some games together ....Nofoaluma is getting away from what makes him a good running winger ...he loses effectiveness when he changes direction ...he is far better off using some footwork at the line and try and get quicker play the balls

Many are saying we are 2-3 players away from a good side .....I don't think so ...many of these guys don't gel

We need to go back to the start ...show faith in Madge .....give him some latitude to build a good squad around some key signings

This squad is so far away from a premiership it's not funny in my opinion

You won’t get much of a chance to build anything if you change the team every second week

This year is a write off. We’ll be lucky not to come 15th. You might as well use this year as an experiment and try different combinations and see what combinations work and which ones don’t.

The rule changes turned us into a bottom 4 side , unfortunately we are starting to that

Sorry ..but we are looking at another rebuild ....everyone still love the rules changes
 
I like what I’ve seen from him in past years but he needs a change.
His a local boy that’s managed to succeed in his dream of playing for his local professional team getting paid half a million dollars a season and probably still lives round the corner from his mom.
He needs to move interstate or overseas.
I don’t care if he succeeds as a ‘halfback’ in another team. I’ll be happy for him.
If his strength is running and defence, we’ll seizer has that in spades.
His also a left foot kicker and he plays predominantly on the left side and kicks goals.
With Reynolds still around next year I feel that could be a good combination. Also assists with not rushing Madden into first grade.
Brooks needs to go he really does, for the benefit of us and for the benefit of him. His not a 5/8, his a halfback that has lost his confidence and has never found his voice, his kicking game has gone backwards and aside from backing up a couple of runs others have started he doesn’t have a good running game either.
But it all starts with naming Marshall in the 7 next week to play on the left side. (Reynolds is much better on the right).
 
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162509) said:
@mike said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162481) said:
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162469) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162452) said:
Again it's a case of us signing good players .....

But this is a team game and that team HAS to gel

Brooks doesn't gel with Reynolds or Marshall

Douehi doesn't gel with the style of Grant

And then we have the whole Huth , Seyfarth and Clark situation

Of the three Huth is easily the best of the game they play ...he doesn't get dominated in attack like the other two do ...and is better defensively

We still have no sting on our edges ...Lucy is a step in the right direction ..but we are using him as a 80 minute player ...he loses his effectiveness

Brooks and Garner looked like they were building some good combos last season ...where the hell has that gone

Joey has shown little from what we saw in the Warriors trial ...Mbye isn't getting quality ball in attacking situations

Talau looked good last night and hopefully he gets a chance to string some games together ....Nofoaluma is getting away from what makes him a good running winger ...he loses effectiveness when he changes direction ...he is far better off using some footwork at the line and try and get quicker play the balls

Many are saying we are 2-3 players away from a good side .....I don't think so ...many of these guys don't gel

We need to go back to the start ...show faith in Madge .....give him some latitude to build a good squad around some key signings

This squad is so far away from a premiership it's not funny in my opinion

You won’t get much of a chance to build anything if you change the team every second week

This year is a write off. We’ll be lucky not to come 15th. You might as well use this year as an experiment and try different combinations and see what combinations work and which ones don’t.

The rule changes turned us into a bottom 4 side , unfortunately we are starting to that

Sorry ..but we are looking at another rebuild ....everyone still love the rules changes

Love the rule changes. I don’t ever want to go back to the rubbish the game had descended into. If people like getting all the calls technically correct then they can go and watch Union.
 
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162503) said:
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162499) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162497) said:
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162495) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162494) said:
@Russell said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162483) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162229) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162200) said:
So Brooks is the new Jennings now...
The 7 can be a role player. Sezer lastcyear was a role player in the Raiders team last year same as Townsend for Sharks.
Hindsiggt is a wonderful thing but looks like we let the wrong half go in Moses

Moses walked
Brooks was desperate as no other club would take him
If Jennings was a half he’d be luke Brooks

I am tired of correcting you in your hate for Brooks.

Other clubs did want him - Melbourne and the Dogs wanted him for a start.

Russ ....what 6 in the NRL is a good mix with Brooks in your opinion

Munster..easy one..

No it wouldn't work ......Brooks would get even more muddled in his mind at his role

Have you watched the Storm this year..Munster does much much much more than just run..

You don't need Brooks if you sign Munster ...you could get a far better half that would fit Munster's style

And you shoot yourself in the foot with the Munster argument .....if we need to get a player of Munsters ability ....Brooks isn't that good ...is he ??

Munster's strength is his running game ...Brooks only strength is his running game ...and he doesn't even have confidence in that

I'd hate to think what that would do to Brooks and his confidence

Jerome Hughes..?
 
@mike said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162492) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162489) said:
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162469) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162452) said:
Again it's a case of us signing good players .....

But this is a team game and that team HAS to gel

Brooks doesn't gel with Reynolds or Marshall

Douehi doesn't gel with the style of Grant

And then we have the whole Huth , Seyfarth and Clark situation

Of the three Huth is easily the best of the game they play ...he doesn't get dominated in attack like the other two do ...and is better defensively

We still have no sting on our edges ...Lucy is a step in the right direction ..but we are using him as a 80 minute player ...he loses his effectiveness

Brooks and Garner looked like they were building some good combos last season ...where the hell has that gone

Joey has shown little from what we saw in the Warriors trial ...Mbye isn't getting quality ball in attacking situations

Talau looked good last night and hopefully he gets a chance to string some games together ....Nofoaluma is getting away from what makes him a good running winger ...he loses effectiveness when he changes direction ...he is far better off using some footwork at the line and try and get quicker play the balls

Many are saying we are 2-3 players away from a good side .....I don't think so ...many of these guys don't gel

We need to go back to the start ...show faith in Madge .....give him some latitude to build a good squad around some key signings

This squad is so far away from a premiership it's not funny in my opinion

You won’t get much of a chance to build anything if you change the team every second week

So Brooks get picked because we shouldn't change combinations .....

Brooks won't play to his strength Geo ...he won't lead the team .....he's had 7 seasons now

Tell me what spine gels .....and lets go with it for the next 15 rounds

My opinion the best spine that would gel was

1 Thompson
6 Douehi
7 Brooks
9 Grant

14 Marshall

Its the only one that all their strengths match up and should mix well

That spine is worth a shot. Not convinced about Brooks though.

Well I'm not sure about Thommo either , but he suits the game Grant plays and will follow him up the guts (and others and create more 2nd phase )

As a WT's fan it is mind blowing our best player isn't our player and we are looking at a bottom 4 finish
 
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162499) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162497) said:
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162495) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162494) said:
@Russell said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162483) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162229) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162200) said:
So Brooks is the new Jennings now...
The 7 can be a role player. Sezer lastcyear was a role player in the Raiders team last year same as Townsend for Sharks.
Hindsiggt is a wonderful thing but looks like we let the wrong half go in Moses

Moses walked
Brooks was desperate as no other club would take him
If Jennings was a half he’d be luke Brooks

I am tired of correcting you in your hate for Brooks.

Other clubs did want him - Melbourne and the Dogs wanted him for a start.

Russ ....what 6 in the NRL is a good mix with Brooks in your opinion

Munster..easy one..

No it wouldn't work ......Brooks would get even more muddled in his mind at his role

Have you watched the Storm this year..Munster does much much much more than just run..

We wouldn’t even need a halfback if we had Munster
 
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162516) said:
@mike said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162492) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162489) said:
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162469) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162452) said:
Again it's a case of us signing good players .....

But this is a team game and that team HAS to gel

Brooks doesn't gel with Reynolds or Marshall

Douehi doesn't gel with the style of Grant

And then we have the whole Huth , Seyfarth and Clark situation

Of the three Huth is easily the best of the game they play ...he doesn't get dominated in attack like the other two do ...and is better defensively

We still have no sting on our edges ...Lucy is a step in the right direction ..but we are using him as a 80 minute player ...he loses his effectiveness

Brooks and Garner looked like they were building some good combos last season ...where the hell has that gone

Joey has shown little from what we saw in the Warriors trial ...Mbye isn't getting quality ball in attacking situations

Talau looked good last night and hopefully he gets a chance to string some games together ....Nofoaluma is getting away from what makes him a good running winger ...he loses effectiveness when he changes direction ...he is far better off using some footwork at the line and try and get quicker play the balls

Many are saying we are 2-3 players away from a good side .....I don't think so ...many of these guys don't gel

We need to go back to the start ...show faith in Madge .....give him some latitude to build a good squad around some key signings

This squad is so far away from a premiership it's not funny in my opinion

You won’t get much of a chance to build anything if you change the team every second week

So Brooks get picked because we shouldn't change combinations .....

Brooks won't play to his strength Geo ...he won't lead the team .....he's had 7 seasons now

Tell me what spine gels .....and lets go with it for the next 15 rounds

My opinion the best spine that would gel was

1 Thompson
6 Douehi
7 Brooks
9 Grant

14 Marshall

Its the only one that all their strengths match up and should mix well

That spine is worth a shot. Not convinced about Brooks though.

Well I'm not sure about Thommo either , but he suits the game Grant plays and will follow him up the guts (and others and create more 2nd phase )

As a WT's fan it is mind blowing our best player isn't our player and we are looking at a bottom 4 finish

Speaks volumes doesn’t it.
 
@mike said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162513) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162509) said:
@mike said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162481) said:
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162469) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162452) said:
Again it's a case of us signing good players .....

But this is a team game and that team HAS to gel

Brooks doesn't gel with Reynolds or Marshall

Douehi doesn't gel with the style of Grant

And then we have the whole Huth , Seyfarth and Clark situation

Of the three Huth is easily the best of the game they play ...he doesn't get dominated in attack like the other two do ...and is better defensively

We still have no sting on our edges ...Lucy is a step in the right direction ..but we are using him as a 80 minute player ...he loses his effectiveness

Brooks and Garner looked like they were building some good combos last season ...where the hell has that gone

Joey has shown little from what we saw in the Warriors trial ...Mbye isn't getting quality ball in attacking situations

Talau looked good last night and hopefully he gets a chance to string some games together ....Nofoaluma is getting away from what makes him a good running winger ...he loses effectiveness when he changes direction ...he is far better off using some footwork at the line and try and get quicker play the balls

Many are saying we are 2-3 players away from a good side .....I don't think so ...many of these guys don't gel

We need to go back to the start ...show faith in Madge .....give him some latitude to build a good squad around some key signings

This squad is so far away from a premiership it's not funny in my opinion

You won’t get much of a chance to build anything if you change the team every second week

This year is a write off. We’ll be lucky not to come 15th. You might as well use this year as an experiment and try different combinations and see what combinations work and which ones don’t.

The rule changes turned us into a bottom 4 side , unfortunately we are starting to that

Sorry ..but we are looking at another rebuild ....everyone still love the rules changes

Love the rule changes. I don’t ever want to go back to the rubbish the game had descended into. If people like getting all the calls technically correct then they can go and watch Union.

It will set us back 3 years ...we have a squad that mostly isn't suited to the rule changes bar the bloke going back to the Storm
 
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162515) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162503) said:
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162499) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162497) said:
@Geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162495) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162494) said:
@Russell said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162483) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162229) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1162200) said:
So Brooks is the new Jennings now...
The 7 can be a role player. Sezer lastcyear was a role player in the Raiders team last year same as Townsend for Sharks.
Hindsiggt is a wonderful thing but looks like we let the wrong half go in Moses

Moses walked
Brooks was desperate as no other club would take him
If Jennings was a half he’d be luke Brooks

I am tired of correcting you in your hate for Brooks.

Other clubs did want him - Melbourne and the Dogs wanted him for a start.

Russ ....what 6 in the NRL is a good mix with Brooks in your opinion

Munster..easy one..

No it wouldn't work ......Brooks would get even more muddled in his mind at his role

Have you watched the Storm this year..Munster does much much much more than just run..

You don't need Brooks if you sign Munster ...you could get a far better half that would fit Munster's style

And you shoot yourself in the foot with the Munster argument .....if we need to get a player of Munsters ability ....Brooks isn't that good ...is he ??

Munster's strength is his running game ...Brooks only strength is his running game ...and he doesn't even have confidence in that

I'd hate to think what that would do to Brooks and his confidence

Jerome Hughes..?

Is he better than Jahrome Hughes ??

I'm being serious ...we will need to sign a 6 and 7 ...what player will suit Brooks ...what player suits Reynolds if you go down that path ...and then if we are looking at Madden who suits him ...he seems like another predominantly running player from the little I've seen of him
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top