Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1314656) said:Brooks has had 4 try assists in 2 years
I know this season isn’t over yet but ............................
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1314968) said:@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1314656) said:Brooks has had 4 try assists in 2 years
I know this season isn’t over yet but ............................
Haven't watched it yet but that looks like a stat up 25%..
@hybrid_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1315054) said:I stand by my original post.
It's going to be another long year with Brooks steering the ship around.
@speed2burn said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1314969) said:@formerguest said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1314967) said:A former Tigers half gave his thoughts on our forum friend's podcast page on Facebook

Not sure what game he was watching , our forwards laid a solid platform IMO we just looked clueless in attack
But early in the first half we were rolling through 50-60 meter sets with ease
@swordy said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1315128) said:Im not writing off Brooks yet, but he has had a good run.
But I will say this. He is not an 'off the cuff' player, never has been and never will be. I will get a few clips, but I reckon he is very much in the Cooper Cronk mould.
Cooper Cronk was not an off the cuff player either, everything so so miltarily precise in fact like a machine. But he was extremely good at following a plan and building pressure with the right kicking game.
The only difference, in my opinion, between Brooks and Cronk is the forwards they have served behind.
If you have years of a dominant forward packs, breaking the advantage line - and you are playing with the opposition defense moving backwards, then its a lot easier than trying to do the same thing with the opposition defense moving forward, getting good line speed and crowding you for room.
Until our forwards start dominating, then I think maybe a more Munster/Michael Morgan/ type half that makes up stuff as they go would be advantage for us. Thats not to say that Brooks isnt a good half, because he is every bit as good as a Cronk type in my opinion. I dont want Benji back, but thats why he was probably a little more succesful.
@zach said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1315132) said:@swordy said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1315128) said:Im not writing off Brooks yet, but he has had a good run.
But I will say this. He is not an 'off the cuff' player, never has been and never will be. I will get a few clips, but I reckon he is very much in the Cooper Cronk mould.
Cooper Cronk was not an off the cuff player either, everything so so miltarily precise in fact like a machine. But he was extremely good at following a plan and building pressure with the right kicking game.
The only difference, in my opinion, between Brooks and Cronk is the forwards they have served behind.
If you have years of a dominant forward packs, breaking the advantage line - and you are playing with the opposition defense moving backwards, then its a lot easier than trying to do the same thing with the opposition defense moving forward, getting good line speed and crowding you for room.
Until our forwards start dominating, then I think maybe a more Munster/Michael Morgan/ type half that makes up stuff as they go would be advantage for us. Thats not to say that Brooks isnt a good half, because he is every bit as good as a Cronk type in my opinion. I dont want Benji back, but thats why he was probably a little more succesful.
i would love to agree with you....but you're just wrong.
because even when we were in good attacking positions thanks to our forward pack (who for the first time in years look like they have the making of a good solid pack) Brooks did NOTHING once again. he failed. as simple as that. he did not execute, he did not make any decisions with conviction, he did not do his job. he did not set the tempo or create anything. and this has been the case for many a season.