Luke Brooks

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm over whatever gender keeps banging on about Brooks.. no matter what side you fall.. no one is going to convince the other..it really is a waste..

It's funny really as he is not as bad as made out nor is he a good as he has made out depending on which side you sit..

Everyone knows I like him and will defend him when things that are said that isn't true...I also feel his time is done here..that is no slight on Brooks a guy who has never tanked wearing our jersey and gave it a crack even if he did come up short..the vitriol he cops is unfair..which is what I'll defend..

In any case he would be one of the very few that I would be happy to see succeed if he left..
 
Brooks for the betterment of his career needs to go whether its to Canberra or the dogs whatever he needs to go for himself because staying in the same place will do nothing for his career
 
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453372) said:
I'm over whatever gender keeps banging on about Brooks.. no matter what side you fall.. no one is going to convince the other..it really is a waste..

It's funny really as he is not as bad as made out nor is he a good as he has made out depending on which side you sit..

Everyone knows I like him and will defend him when things that are said that isn't true...I also feel his time is done here..that is no slight on Brooks a guy who has never tanked wearing our jersey and gave it a crack even if he did come up short..the vitriol he cops is unfair..which is what I'll defend..

In any case he would be one of the very few that I would be happy to see succeed if he left..

Thing is Geo,if the club wasnt a rabble when Luke first made his debut and we had stable admin,coaches and a really good roster,I think we may have seen an even better halfback in Luke..but he is a WTs lad and is loyal,if you do look at his form he is doing his best with whats around him.....
 
@truetiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453377) said:
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453372) said:
I'm over whatever gender keeps banging on about Brooks.. no matter what side you fall.. no one is going to convince the other..it really is a waste..

It's funny really as he is not as bad as made out nor is he a good as he has made out depending on which side you sit..

Everyone knows I like him and will defend him when things that are said that isn't true...I also feel his time is done here..that is no slight on Brooks a guy who has never tanked wearing our jersey and gave it a crack even if he did come up short..the vitriol he cops is unfair..which is what I'll defend..

In any case he would be one of the very few that I would be happy to see succeed if he left..

Thing is Geo,if the club wasnt a rabble when Luke first made his debut and we had stable admin,coaches and a really good roster,I think we may have seen an even better halfback in Luke..but he is a WTs lad and is loyal,if you do look at his form he is doing his best with whats around him.....

That’s not the argument mate..
It’s about his lack of smarts when an opportunity is there to be taken .
He looks for others to do his job .
Either shift him to 9 or 13 or pay him out
 
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453372) said:
I'm over whatever gender keeps banging on about Brooks.. no matter what side you fall.. no one is going to convince the other..it really is a waste..

It's funny really as he is not as bad as made out nor is he a good as he has made out depending on which side you sit..

Everyone knows I like him and will defend him when things that are said that isn't true...I also feel his time is done here..that is no slight on Brooks a guy who has never tanked wearing our jersey and gave it a crack even if he did come up short..the vitriol he cops is unfair..which is what I'll defend..

In any case he would be one of the very few that I would be happy to see succeed if he left..

I agree. I’m not going to try and argue Brooks is in the top 5 halfbacks in the game but he certainly isn’t in the bottom 5 either.

If we happen to pick up a top shelf halfback then let him go, but I have a feeling If Brooks does leave he will benefit more than Wests Tigers will.
 
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453382) said:
@truetiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453377) said:
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453372) said:
I'm over whatever gender keeps banging on about Brooks.. no matter what side you fall.. no one is going to convince the other..it really is a waste..

It's funny really as he is not as bad as made out nor is he a good as he has made out depending on which side you sit..

Everyone knows I like him and will defend him when things that are said that isn't true...I also feel his time is done here..that is no slight on Brooks a guy who has never tanked wearing our jersey and gave it a crack even if he did come up short..the vitriol he cops is unfair..which is what I'll defend..

In any case he would be one of the very few that I would be happy to see succeed if he left..

Thing is Geo,if the club wasnt a rabble when Luke first made his debut and we had stable admin,coaches and a really good roster,I think we may have seen an even better halfback in Luke..but he is a WTs lad and is loyal,if you do look at his form he is doing his best with whats around him.....

That’s not the argument mate..
It’s about his lack of smarts when an opportunity is there to be taken .
He looks for others to do his job .
Either shift him to 9 or 13 or pay him out

Are you saying close to the line Hobbo ? Because , I’m ? sure it’s been stated that in the red zone , his primary objective is to get early ball in the hands of AD and Laurie . AD said it in a podcast , and Madge has alluded to it several times .
In years gone past the complaint was that the ball would die in the centre of the field . The lack of killer instinct , is a fair judgement for Luke , I’ll cop that , his execution in critical times can be poor , He’s not the benji type who will pluck a 20 point deficit out of his backside , but Luke brooks in a front running team like the storm or roosters . I think we will be singing a different tune .
 
Question:

**Back in 2017, If we had kept Mitchell Moses and Brooks had left for Parra - do you think we would have played finals football at any point since then?**

(In my opinion….)

If your answer is yes, then it’s time for a different direction and Hastings should get first shot at 7

If your answer is no, then is playing a new half really going to change anything? As clearly there is bigger issues in the team.

I have always been a Brooks fan and in no way blame him for our loss or the season. I just think, to stop this on going commentary year after year it may be time both parties move in a different direction.
 
@strongee said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453393) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453382) said:
@truetiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453377) said:
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453372) said:
I'm over whatever gender keeps banging on about Brooks.. no matter what side you fall.. no one is going to convince the other..it really is a waste..

It's funny really as he is not as bad as made out nor is he a good as he has made out depending on which side you sit..

Everyone knows I like him and will defend him when things that are said that isn't true...I also feel his time is done here..that is no slight on Brooks a guy who has never tanked wearing our jersey and gave it a crack even if he did come up short..the vitriol he cops is unfair..which is what I'll defend..

In any case he would be one of the very few that I would be happy to see succeed if he left..

Thing is Geo,if the club wasnt a rabble when Luke first made his debut and we had stable admin,coaches and a really good roster,I think we may have seen an even better halfback in Luke..but he is a WTs lad and is loyal,if you do look at his form he is doing his best with whats around him.....

That’s not the argument mate..
It’s about his lack of smarts when an opportunity is there to be taken .
He looks for others to do his job .
Either shift him to 9 or 13 or pay him out

Are you saying close to the line Hobbo ? Because , I’m ? sure it’s been stated that in the red zone , his primary objective is to get early ball in the hands of AD and Laurie . AD said it in a podcast , and Madge has alluded to it several times .
In years gone past the complaint was that the ball would die in the centre of the field . The lack of killer instinct , is a fair judgement for Luke , I’ll cop that , his execution in critical times can be poor , He’s not the benji type who will pluck a 20 point deficit out of his backside , but Luke brooks in a front running team like the storm or roosters . I think we will be singing a different tune .

Disagree
He wouldn’t have been around long enough to find out if he could cut it either with the Storm or Roosters ..
10 out - 20 out - 30 out - he lacks the basics of a top 7 .
It’s his lack of ability with his kicking and long passing game that lets him down ..
He’s got talent .. sure .. but due to lacking brains / smarts he’s too inconsistent in leading us around the park and taking the team into the finals .
Can’t keep blaming those around him when it’s his primary job to make the most of the opportunity’s when they arise ..
Doueihi is a rookie 6
Laurie is a rookie 1
Liddle can’t cut it for more than 30 mins yet Brooks has had the opportunity to play 160 odd games and in my opinion it’s on him !
 
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453408) said:
@strongee said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453393) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453382) said:
@truetiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453377) said:
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453372) said:
I'm over whatever gender keeps banging on about Brooks.. no matter what side you fall.. no one is going to convince the other..it really is a waste..

It's funny really as he is not as bad as made out nor is he a good as he has made out depending on which side you sit..

Everyone knows I like him and will defend him when things that are said that isn't true...I also feel his time is done here..that is no slight on Brooks a guy who has never tanked wearing our jersey and gave it a crack even if he did come up short..the vitriol he cops is unfair..which is what I'll defend..

In any case he would be one of the very few that I would be happy to see succeed if he left..

Thing is Geo,if the club wasnt a rabble when Luke first made his debut and we had stable admin,coaches and a really good roster,I think we may have seen an even better halfback in Luke..but he is a WTs lad and is loyal,if you do look at his form he is doing his best with whats around him.....

That’s not the argument mate..
It’s about his lack of smarts when an opportunity is there to be taken .
He looks for others to do his job .
Either shift him to 9 or 13 or pay him out

Are you saying close to the line Hobbo ? Because , I’m ? sure it’s been stated that in the red zone , his primary objective is to get early ball in the hands of AD and Laurie . AD said it in a podcast , and Madge has alluded to it several times .
In years gone past the complaint was that the ball would die in the centre of the field . The lack of killer instinct , is a fair judgement for Luke , I’ll cop that , his execution in critical times can be poor , He’s not the benji type who will pluck a 20 point deficit out of his backside , but Luke brooks in a front running team like the storm or roosters . I think we will be singing a different tune .

Disagree
He wouldn’t have been around long enough to find out if he could cut it either with the Storm or Roosters ..
10 out - 20 out - 30 out - he lacks the basics of a top 7 .
It’s his lack of ability with his kicking and long passing game that lets him down ..
He’s got talent .. sure .. but due to lacking brains / smarts he’s too inconsistent in leading us around the park and taking the team into the finals .
Can’t keep blaming those around him when it’s his primary job to make the most of the opportunity’s when they arise ..
Doueihi is a rookie 6
Laurie is a rookie 1
Liddle can’t cut it for more than 30 mins yet Brooks has had the opportunity to play 160 odd games and in my opinion it’s on him !

I’m not going to debate that stuff . We’ve been over it . I’m more pointing out the red zone passing it on , it’s literally the game plan .

It’s clear he needs to move on , but I’m ? going to say I told you so , when he hoists the trophy with another , better club.
And that will , with the whole big 4 , and even benj and Robbie only winning 1 premiership , at to the list of how badly mismanaged this club has been .
 
Doueihi is a rookie 6
Laurie is a rookie 1
Liddle can’t cut it for more than 30 mins yet Brooks has had the opportunity to play 160 odd games and in my opinion it’s on him !

Just a thought after reading your last few lines....
maybe the fact that the rest of the spine is exactly that, could be part of his problem.Just saying.....
 
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453429) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453421) said:
Enough of the personal stuff, anything further will be deleted.

Sorry Cochise but I've done very little wrong here.

Have the balls to call out the troublemaker.

To be honest, I don't know who started it or who said what and I am not going back and reading through that tripe to find out. It stops now.
 
@strongee said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453414) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453408) said:
@strongee said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453393) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453382) said:
@truetiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453377) said:
@geo said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453372) said:
I'm over whatever gender keeps banging on about Brooks.. no matter what side you fall.. no one is going to convince the other..it really is a waste..

It's funny really as he is not as bad as made out nor is he a good as he has made out depending on which side you sit..

Everyone knows I like him and will defend him when things that are said that isn't true...I also feel his time is done here..that is no slight on Brooks a guy who has never tanked wearing our jersey and gave it a crack even if he did come up short..the vitriol he cops is unfair..which is what I'll defend..

In any case he would be one of the very few that I would be happy to see succeed if he left..

Thing is Geo,if the club wasnt a rabble when Luke first made his debut and we had stable admin,coaches and a really good roster,I think we may have seen an even better halfback in Luke..but he is a WTs lad and is loyal,if you do look at his form he is doing his best with whats around him.....

That’s not the argument mate..
It’s about his lack of smarts when an opportunity is there to be taken .
He looks for others to do his job .
Either shift him to 9 or 13 or pay him out

Are you saying close to the line Hobbo ? Because , I’m ? sure it’s been stated that in the red zone , his primary objective is to get early ball in the hands of AD and Laurie . AD said it in a podcast , and Madge has alluded to it several times .
In years gone past the complaint was that the ball would die in the centre of the field . The lack of killer instinct , is a fair judgement for Luke , I’ll cop that , his execution in critical times can be poor , He’s not the benji type who will pluck a 20 point deficit out of his backside , but Luke brooks in a front running team like the storm or roosters . I think we will be singing a different tune .

Disagree
He wouldn’t have been around long enough to find out if he could cut it either with the Storm or Roosters ..
10 out - 20 out - 30 out - he lacks the basics of a top 7 .
It’s his lack of ability with his kicking and long passing game that lets him down ..
He’s got talent .. sure .. but due to lacking brains / smarts he’s too inconsistent in leading us around the park and taking the team into the finals .
Can’t keep blaming those around him when it’s his primary job to make the most of the opportunity’s when they arise ..
Doueihi is a rookie 6
Laurie is a rookie 1
Liddle can’t cut it for more than 30 mins yet Brooks has had the opportunity to play 160 odd games and in my opinion it’s on him !

I’m not going to debate that stuff . We’ve been over it . I’m more pointing out the red zone passing it on , it’s literally the game plan .

It’s clear he needs to move on , but I’m ? going to say I told you so , when he hoists the trophy with another , better club.
And that will , with the whole big 4 , and even benj and Robbie only winning 1 premiership , at to the list of how badly mismanaged this club has been .

With all due respect I’ve said my piece .. take it up with someone else ..
cheers ?
 
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453431) said:
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453429) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453421) said:
Enough of the personal stuff, anything further will be deleted.

Sorry Cochise but I've done very little wrong here.

Have the balls to call out the troublemaker.

Too be honest, I don't know who started it or who said what and I am not going back and reading through that tripe to find out. It stops now.

Ok thanks.

That's me done for this year.

That's a pathetic response and I'm not going to just accept it.
 
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453436) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453431) said:
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453429) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453421) said:
Enough of the personal stuff, anything further will be deleted.

Sorry Cochise but I've done very little wrong here.

Have the balls to call out the troublemaker.

Too be honest, I don't know who started it or who said what and I am not going back and reading through that tripe to find out. It stops now.

Ok thanks.

That's me done for this year.

That's a pathetic response and I'm not going to just accept it.

There is a report function, mods can not be everywhere.
 
Back to Brooks for a minute... Firstly, I have been a supporter of his and do believe he has copped some unfair criticism this season. Obviously opinions are very divided, however I do think there are a lot more fair reasons behind his perceived lack of performance than simply saying he's rubbish.
One comment I have though, and this is something I have noticed more recently, is he has completely lost his confidence to run the ball, OR, to kick the ball along the ground. His spark and acceleration seem to have gone. It was always a quality if his and I can't help but feel that he has been bashed so much in the media and by fans, that the guy is struggling now. Sadly, he looks to me like he is emotionally spent.
 
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453436) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453431) said:
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453429) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453421) said:
Enough of the personal stuff, anything further will be deleted.

Sorry Cochise but I've done very little wrong here.

Have the balls to call out the troublemaker.

Too be honest, I don't know who started it or who said what and I am not going back and reading through that tripe to find out. It stops now.

Ok thanks.

That's me done for this year.

That's a pathetic response and I'm not going to just accept it.

Don't let it get to you just use the block function
 
Ok, 2 members just earned themselves a week on the sidelines for unnecessary personal attacks against each other.

For both members, and you know who you are, have a think about how you would like to be treated on this forum, because if behaviour like this reoccurs, I'll make the ban permanent.
 
@tony-soprano said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453453) said:
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453436) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453431) said:
@the_patriot said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453429) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1453421) said:
Enough of the personal stuff, anything further will be deleted.

Sorry Cochise but I've done very little wrong here.

Have the balls to call out the troublemaker.

Too be honest, I don't know who started it or who said what and I am not going back and reading through that tripe to find out. It stops now.

Ok thanks.

That's me done for this year.

That's a pathetic response and I'm not going to just accept it.

Don't let it get to you just use the block function

bring in a hug button
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Back
Top