Luke Brooks

Status
Not open for further replies.
@tcat said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496906) said:
@willow said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496826) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496746) said:
@donk said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496744) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496741) said:
@inbrookswetrust said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1495736) said:
in brooks we trust, also bring back tiger5150

This wasnt me, Im just saying

Hey, welcome back. I thought you were banned?

Cant keep a good man down ;-)

Hmm, I see you felt the need to whinge to Kul over an argument which you started and deservedly earnt a stint in the cooler. I trust you've learned your lesson.

Probably should retract the above post. Nothing to do with Luke Brooks and sounds personal.



@tcat said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496906) said:
@willow said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496826) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496746) said:
@donk said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496744) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496741) said:
@inbrookswetrust said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1495736) said:
in brooks we trust, also bring back tiger5150

This wasnt me, Im just saying

Hey, welcome back. I thought you were banned?

Cant keep a good man down ;-)

Hmm, I see you felt the need to whinge to Kul over an argument which you started and deservedly earnt a stint in the cooler. I trust you've learned your lesson.

Probably should retract the above post. Nothing to do with Luke Brooks and sounds personal.

Yep if standards are to be enforced, they should affect all members.
 
@donk said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496907) said:
@tcat said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496906) said:
@willow said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496826) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496746) said:
@donk said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496744) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496741) said:
@inbrookswetrust said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1495736) said:
in brooks we trust, also bring back tiger5150

This wasnt me, Im just saying

Hey, welcome back. I thought you were banned?

Cant keep a good man down ;-)

Hmm, I see you felt the need to whinge to Kul over an argument which you started and deservedly earnt a stint in the cooler. I trust you've learned your lesson.

Probably should retract the above post. Nothing to do with Luke Brooks and sounds personal.



@tcat said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496906) said:
@willow said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496826) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496746) said:
@donk said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496744) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496741) said:
@inbrookswetrust said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1495736) said:
in brooks we trust, also bring back tiger5150

This wasnt me, Im just saying

Hey, welcome back. I thought you were banned?

Cant keep a good man down ;-)

Hmm, I see you felt the need to whinge to Kul over an argument which you started and deservedly earnt a stint in the cooler. I trust you've learned your lesson.

Probably should retract the above post. Nothing to do with Luke Brooks and sounds personal.

Yep if standards are to be enforced, they should affect all members.

Ironically the reason I was given for my ban was “personal attack “ on a member.


Anyway, back on track. Has anyone considered how Brooks would go at 9?
 
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496908) said:
@donk said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496907) said:
@tcat said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496906) said:
@willow said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496826) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496746) said:
@donk said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496744) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496741) said:
@inbrookswetrust said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1495736) said:
in brooks we trust, also bring back tiger5150

This wasnt me, Im just saying

Hey, welcome back. I thought you were banned?

Cant keep a good man down ;-)

Hmm, I see you felt the need to whinge to Kul over an argument which you started and deservedly earnt a stint in the cooler. I trust you've learned your lesson.

Probably should retract the above post. Nothing to do with Luke Brooks and sounds personal.



@tcat said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496906) said:
@willow said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496826) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496746) said:
@donk said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496744) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496741) said:
@inbrookswetrust said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1495736) said:
in brooks we trust, also bring back tiger5150

This wasnt me, Im just saying

Hey, welcome back. I thought you were banned?

Cant keep a good man down ;-)

Hmm, I see you felt the need to whinge to Kul over an argument which you started and deservedly earnt a stint in the cooler. I trust you've learned your lesson.

Probably should retract the above post. Nothing to do with Luke Brooks and sounds personal.

Yep if standards are to be enforced, they should affect all members.

Ironically the reason I was given for my ban was “personal attack “ on a member.


Anyway, back on track. Has anyone considered how Brooks would go at 9?

Every day ...at the Storm ...Roosters ...Dogs ...Warriors ...Sharks .....Raiders ....Souffs .....PNG Hunters ...ESL ...Union .....anyone
 
@weststigsrdabest said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496928) said:
Anyone got the article about knights wanting him

I haven’t read it but makes sense. Pearce wants out to take up $2m on the riviera.
 
@weststigsrdabest said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496928) said:
Anyone got the article about knights wanting him

Read it makes sense for all parties. Isaac Moses manages Brooks and Newcastle’s coach Pearce wants to go to Catalans and Knights are a better team for Brooks. We get cap space and start Hastings and Madden early season and then bring douihei in. If the Tigers can get a player in return that would be smart.

Tigers have to have players to sign though releasing Brooks does not improve us by itself due to the Douihei injury.
 
I'm praying for the Knights to take Brooks off us on full freight. The club will finally be able to move forward without having him as an anchor
 
@camel2281 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496946) said:
I'm praying for the Knights to take Brooks off us on full freight. The club will finally be able to move forward without having him as an anchor

You’re dreaming
 
@camel2281 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496946) said:
I'm praying for the Knights to take Brooks off us on full freight. The club will finally be able to move forward without having him as an anchor

I can’t see them taking him without us chipping in
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496950) said:
@camel2281 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1496946) said:
I'm praying for the Knights to take Brooks off us on full freight. The club will finally be able to move forward without having him as an anchor

I can’t see them taking him without us chipping in

We can dream. They pay full freight and we get Mitchell Barnett
 
Well if we release Brooks we have Hastings, Madden, Peachey and Laurie that can play in the halves along with Doueihi once his knee gets better. Its doable, since many have written off 22 as a rebuild year once again whats the difference? Also there would still be the potential of getting another player capable of playing the halves as further backup.

Also player swap an alternate option for WT & Newc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top