@boonboon said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1499558) said:
Luke Brooks 2021- statistical performance among halfbacks
Try Assists - 23 (4th best)
Try Contributions - 13 (4th best)
Runs - 161 (3rd best)
Run meters - 1378 (3rd Best)
Line Breaks - 5 (10th best)
Line Break Assists - 14 (6th Best)
Tackle Breaks - 45 (4th Best)
Effective Offloads - 23 (3rd Best)
Errors - 23 (5th worst but better then DCE, Hunt, Reynolds, Clifford)
Penalties - 14 (worst amongst halves)
**> Possessions - 1450 (most possessions of any half in the comp)**
Line Engagements - 354 (most in comp)
General Play Passes - 846 (most in comp)
Line Drop Outs forced - 12 (7th best)
Kick Meters - 6862 (5th best)
Attacking Kicks - 127 (2nd most)
Kicks Dead -3 (12th most)
Kick Errors - 7 (equal 8th)
Try Causes - 16 (3rd worst)
LB Causes - 18 (equal 3rd worst) behind DCE, Dearden and equla with Reynolds
Tackle Effectiveness - 82% (20th worst) better then likes of Cleary, Harris Tevita, Moses,Walker, Townsend, Clifford, Hunt, Johnson
Now I'm not saying Brooks was perfect but given how week the team was around him these indicate that the problem to me isnt Brooks
Mate I think the stat I've highlighted is the most important for several reasons. A lot of Brooks' stats of being either one of the best or one of the worst in the areas recorded are partly because of his large amount of possessions. Cut them back to average and he's more than likely going to come back to the field across the other stats.
But what it shows more than anything is that despite all those possessions and chances to do so, he still can't make good things happen for us enough. Obviously he is supposed to be our play maker and game manager and we pay him accordingly but he just can't pull that off.
And this is the issue. We're paying him to do a job he's not capable of. He's a good footballer etc etc but not the answer. It seems Madge has tried a lot of things to get him to the next level even handing him captaincy but nothing has inspired him to play at his best with any consistency at all.
As a second fiddle half he'd be fine, but would need to take a pay cut of a couple hundred k. In the current climate another club would be willing to roll the dice and pay him the top dog salary. Which is fine but with our current roster we still need him, the hard truth is that he is still better than our other options.