bigsiro
Well-known member
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1500072) said:@earl said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1500032) said:@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1500026) said:@earl said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1500024) said:@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1499979) said:@viking-warrior said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1499978) said:@earl said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1499973) said:@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1499970) said:Opposition have nothing to worry about with that potential spine.
Hastings could be a gun. If he is we look a lot better.
Think he will be great for us, stoked we signed him.. Him and Ads are real competitor's with voices.
Reynolds had a voice. How’d that work out?
Reynolds was a poor player with poor form and we had a moron signing off on massive contracts. It was a disaster. I don't think they are comparable.
I think it is when we are talking about leaders. Having a voice doesn’t automatically mean he’s going to turn the team around. He has no track record in Australia. The only thing people are clinging to is what he’s done in a third rate competition. It means nothing in Australia.
I have no interest in the leadership idea. Tamou/Mbye sum up to me what leaders add. We need quality players. We need halves that come up with the right plays and create opportunities for us.
Hastings is unproven but I have more confidence in him than Brooks and I have a lot more confidence in Brooks over Reynolds.
The truth is we just have to wait and see how he performs.
How can you have more confidence in someone unproven?
It’s perfectly normal to be confident about recruits. It might turn out to be misplaced, but that’s what happens with any recruit in any business. Why else would you recruit them if you didn’t have confidence in them?
The only thing that IS proven is that Brooks is not a first grade halfback. To have any confidence in him is to go against 8 years of evidence.