Madge and Pascoe

This tread is why I love this forum.

Yep, there are the sack this person, blame that person crew posting as usual but overall most can see through that.

Love the comment that if Madge had Pascoe’s results we would be in the top 8. It’s true.

Love the comments about how negative and infighting surrounds O’Neil, we have all known people like that at work. The ones that always seem to be close to drama.

Facts:
We are consistently in the black financially

We have grown our membership base and annual revenue consistently

We have less front office leaks that I have EVER seen at Wests Tigers

We are consistently doing more in the community including indigenous communities

So... what’s Pascoe’s report card? It’s a B+.

Why a B+...

because some people don’t like his hair cut

because he hasn’t been able to get our team to tackle

because it’s his fault the board hired Potter and JT

and most of all he personally convinced Ivan to dog us
 
@cairnstigers said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1355891) said:
It's probably Benny the shafter that is spreading this rumour
Bring the club to its knees and buy it for a song
Or at least pressure for a sale
You have to ask yourself
Was it Benny that informed the media of the so called tensions between Madge and Pascoe
If he can pry one away from the club all of a sudden we are the laughing stock again
It makes his intentions to take over the club easier
Don't trust Benny
He is in this for himself
If he really wants to help, become a 3rd party investor so we can top up 3rd party payments to snare some key players
He can start with "The Cheese" "Finucane " and
"Coates"

Benny can see our junior system is starting to fire
This will stand us in good sted in the near future
If he comes in now he will try to take credit for all the hard work we have done with our junior system
The results are already showing

So no to Benny

I reckon you could well be :100: spot on re B. Elias spreading rumours @Cairnstigers.
Knowing how many gullible people are out there, a false rumour emanating from a very manipulative person such as the back door bloke can be a very powerful tool unfortunately.
Stop and think about what you could be getting yourself into folks.
If you have doubts about your upcoming marriage to that really lovely smiley person promising to look after you...ask yourself 'will he still need me will he still feed me when I'm 64?
As happens so often we find our self dumped well before we reach 64, then the love of your life goes on to change their name when they marry the next sucker.
The same could well happen if there is a marriage between B. Elias and Wests Tigers.
 
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.
 
@curaeus said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356023) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.

What he has done sponsorship wise is remarkable considering the teams performances over the yrs ,just shows what a huge BRAND this club is and the massive fan base interest !
 
@curaeus said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356023) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.

I put up a quote from him saying he was the lead negotiator in trying to re-sign Teddy.
We can't just clear him of responsibly of anything
the club fails at.
Why did he get credit for growing memberships? Shouldn't the membership dept get accolade?




I put up a quote last week from Pascoe where he said he took responsibly for losing Teddy as he was the lead negotiator.
 
@snake said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356025) said:
@curaeus said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356023) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.

What he has done sponsorship wise is remarkable considering the teams performances over the yrs ,just shows what a huge BRAND this club is and the massive fan base interest !

For what it’s worth, my understanding is that Pascoe has very little involvement in football operations- that’s Hartigan and Madge. He signs off the dollars (not determine the dollars or who we sign)
 
@trippa101 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1355853) said:
Hey guys, just wondering if anyone has heard anything similar to what i'm about to share.

Was speaking to a mate of mine today, late 40s, successful businessman etc (just highlighting to provide some context of credibility - take it what you will), he used to play for Parra back in the day, is good mates with Mark O'Neil (buckets) and a lot of the old tigers players because he grew up in Balmain.

Anyway he told me today that he had heard, it was supposed to come out in the media this week about the fractured relationship between Madge and Pascoe, and that Madge thinks Pascoe is hopeless.

Anyway my only intention is to see if anyone else had heard something similar. I'm not saying that its true. But my mate is a solid guy.

As a matter of interest @trippa101 how is the relationship between Mark O'Neill and B. Arthur going now?
 
@mccarry2 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356012) said:
This tread is why I love this forum.

Yep, there are the sack this person, blame that person crew posting as usual but overall most can see through that.

Love the comment that if Madge had Pascoe’s results we would be in the top 8. It’s true.

Love the comments about how negative and infighting surrounds O’Neil, we have all known people like that at work. The ones that always seem to be close to drama.

Facts:
We are consistently in the black financially

We have grown our membership base and annual revenue consistently

We have less front office leaks that I have EVER seen at Wests Tigers

We are consistently doing more in the community including indigenous communities

So... what’s Pascoe’s report card? It’s a B+.

Why a B+...

because some people don’t like his hair cut

because he hasn’t been able to get our team to tackle

because it’s his fault the board hired Potter and JT

and most of all he personally convinced Ivan to dog us

I love everything you said....until we get to the Ivan part. Didn't he want Ivan to stay, and becuase he left their friendship broke down and they haven't spoken since?
 
@tigersmurf said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356031) said:
@mccarry2 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356012) said:
This tread is why I love this forum.

Yep, there are the sack this person, blame that person crew posting as usual but overall most can see through that.

Love the comment that if Madge had Pascoe’s results we would be in the top 8. It’s true.

Love the comments about how negative and infighting surrounds O’Neil, we have all known people like that at work. The ones that always seem to be close to drama.

Facts:
We are consistently in the black financially

We have grown our membership base and annual revenue consistently

We have less front office leaks that I have EVER seen at Wests Tigers

We are consistently doing more in the community including indigenous communities

So... what’s Pascoe’s report card? It’s a B+.

Why a B+...

because some people don’t like his hair cut

because he hasn’t been able to get our team to tackle

because it’s his fault the board hired Potter and JT

and most of all he personally convinced Ivan to dog us

I love everything you said....until we get to the Ivan part. Didn't he want Ivan to stay, and becuase he left their friendship broke down and they haven't spoken since

Sarcasm, I believe
 
@gallagher said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356027) said:
@curaeus said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356023) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.

I put up a quote from him saying he was the lead negotiator in trying to re-sign Teddy.
We can't just clear him of responsibly of anything
the club fails at.
Why did he get credit for growing memberships? Shouldn't the membership dept get accolade?




I put up a quote last week from Pascoe where he said he took responsibly for losing Teddy as he was the lead negotiator.

Years ago and different processes have been in place for a long time now.
 
@gallagher said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356027) said:
@curaeus said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356023) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.

I put up a quote from him saying he was the lead negotiator in trying to re-sign Teddy.
We can't just clear him of responsibly of anything
the club fails at.
Why did he get credit for growing memberships? Shouldn't the membership dept get accolade?




I put up a quote last week from Pascoe where he said he took responsibly for losing Teddy as he was the lead negotiator.


I saw Teddy getting interviewed a few weeks ago,, he was asked about leaving us, he said the reason he left was they put a deadline on signing, and he wanted to see about a few things first. He actually said, believe it or not, if they hadn’t put a deadline on it, he probably would of stayed
 
@851 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356037) said:
@gallagher said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356027) said:
@curaeus said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356023) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.

I put up a quote from him saying he was the lead negotiator in trying to re-sign Teddy.
We can't just clear him of responsibly of anything
the club fails at.
Why did he get credit for growing memberships? Shouldn't the membership dept get accolade?




I put up a quote last week from Pascoe where he said he took responsibly for losing Teddy as he was the lead negotiator.


I saw Teddy getting interviewed a few weeks ago,, he was asked about leaving us, he said the reason he left was they put a deadline on signing, and he wanted to see about a few things first. He actually said, believe it or not, if they hadn’t put a deadline on it, he probably would of stayed

I don’t believe Teddy for ONE SECOND. I know from a very good Roosters source he had already agreed to terms well before that. My source aside, there were tonnes of people saying the same thing.
 
@mccarry2 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356038) said:
@851 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356037) said:
@gallagher said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356027) said:
@curaeus said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356023) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.

I put up a quote from him saying he was the lead negotiator in trying to re-sign Teddy.
We can't just clear him of responsibly of anything
the club fails at.
Why did he get credit for growing memberships? Shouldn't the membership dept get accolade?




I put up a quote last week from Pascoe where he said he took responsibly for losing Teddy as he was the lead negotiator.


I saw Teddy getting interviewed a few weeks ago,, he was asked about leaving us, he said the reason he left was they put a deadline on signing, and he wanted to see about a few things first. He actually said, believe it or not, if they hadn’t put a deadline on it, he probably would of stayed

I don’t believe Teddy for ONE SECOND. I know from a very good Roosters source he had already agreed to terms well before that. My source aside, there were tonnes of people saying the same thing.

Me either. Dragged it out as long as possible so he could get the deal done with the Roosters
 
@mike said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356039) said:
@mccarry2 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356038) said:
@851 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356037) said:
@gallagher said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356027) said:
@curaeus said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356023) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.

I put up a quote from him saying he was the lead negotiator in trying to re-sign Teddy.
We can't just clear him of responsibly of anything
the club fails at.
Why did he get credit for growing memberships? Shouldn't the membership dept get accolade?




I put up a quote last week from Pascoe where he said he took responsibly for losing Teddy as he was the lead negotiator.


I saw Teddy getting interviewed a few weeks ago,, he was asked about leaving us, he said the reason he left was they put a deadline on signing, and he wanted to see about a few things first. He actually said, believe it or not, if they hadn’t put a deadline on it, he probably would of stayed

I don’t believe Teddy for ONE SECOND. I know from a very good Roosters source he had already agreed to terms well before that. My source aside, there were tonnes of people saying the same thing.

Me either. Dragged it out as long as possible so he could get the deal done with the Roosters

And double whammy lost Papenhuyzen who I believe to be a better player.
 
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

Well said :+1: @Crucible
 
@gallagher said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356027) said:
I put up a quote last week from Pascoe where he said he took responsibly for losing Teddy as he was the lead negotiator.

We could have had the best deal maker of all time and he would have left. The thing that reflects badly on Pascoe here is that he admits to something that was completely out of his control and was never going to happen. I don't like admitting to stuff that had basically nothing at all to do with you. It's a common technique to make yourself out to better than what you are.

We've been a mess in the past and the culture within the playing group when the big 3 were here was terrible. They were just trying to screw us over and had no intention of trying to lead this club to winning premierships.
 
Back
Top