Madge Maguire - Mega Thread

[WT2K]

From DT:

 

[gallagher]

From DT:

Lol, letting media scrutiny decide their moves. They're spooked.

 

[TigerWest]

From DT:

Oh, it’s from the Tele, it must be true.......not

 

[mike]

From DT:

Does anyone actually believe this tripe?

 

[WT2K]

From DT:

Does anyone actually believe this tripe?

Nope. They have another WT article up, I'm not posting it. Might burn the forum down.

 

[izotope]

From DT:

Does anyone actually believe this tripe?

Completely believable with our joke of a board

 

[gallagher]

From DT:

Does anyone actually believe this tripe?

Definitely plausible. You wouldn't rule it out would you?

 

[gallagher]

From DT:

Does anyone actually believe this tripe?

Nope. They have another WT article up, I'm not posting it. Might burn the forum down.

Ah cmon. Need a laugh

 

[mike]

From DT:

Does anyone actually believe this tripe?

Definitely plausible. You wouldn't rule it out would you?

If it's by the DT then yes I would rule it out. They are completely despicable.

 

[gallagher]

From DT:

Does anyone actually believe this tripe?

Definitely plausible. You wouldn't rule it out would you?


If it's by the DT then yes I would rule it out. They are complete despicable.

LOL, hard you argue with that.

 

[WT2K]

From DT:

Does anyone actually believe this tripe?

Nope. They have another WT article up, I'm not posting it. Might burn the forum down.

Ah cmon. Need a laugh

https://weststigersforum.com/topic/32304/revealed-secret-bid-to-buy-battling-tigers

 

[pawsandclaws1]

From DT:

Does anyone actually believe this tripe?

Completely believable with our joke of a board

No if you read it again it states officials who have looked at Flanagan. I would take that to mean club officials not Board members.

 

[TillLindemann]

From DT:

Does anyone actually believe this tripe?

Definitely plausible. You wouldn't rule it out would you?


If it's by the DT then yes I would rule it out. They are completely despicable.

Worst paper in Australia, and always has an agenda.

 

[Merlot]

Madge came in,changed d whole culture from we score more points,we win,2 defence,that is the wrong gameplan2day ,we had it ,we lost it ,in the new game of things ,hope its found sooner than L8r

 

[Tim Sheens]

I am a big Doueihi fan and I think his form generally this year has been pretty good (his game against Souths was excellent and his game against Manly was terrible). I think his attack has been good although i’ve been really disappointed in how little ball he gives JTJ, it’s like he’s invisible. I think his kicking game has been impressive but his defence has been woeful. He really needs to improve his defence.

Pretty well this for me as well, though I want to see less of his bombs too, unless we are in their thirty odd, as overall they are much less effective than Brooks'

 

[Magpieger]

From DT:

Does anyone actually believe this tripe?

Definitely plausible. You wouldn't rule it out would you?


If it's by the DT then yes I would rule it out. They are completely despicable.

Wait, are they despicable rascals or rapscallions?

 

[BZN]

the rabble starts with Canterbury Cup
WE are WESTS TIGERS
play as them in every grade show some unity we are not Magpies we are tigers


That’s just petty

not petty I woukd say petty that Magpies are the Canterbury Cup side considering jersey flogged is wests tigers

No NRL side is represented in CC. They all have feeder teams. The Magpies are the WT’s feeder team.

others are not joint ventures either
we are a joint venture and should be represented equally in Canterbury Cup not just through one side that being Magpies
Roosters have newtown
Manly have blackthorn
again they are not Merged entities like Wests Tigers
it is divisive

The sooner all and sundry realise that the Weststigers are no longer a joint venture the better.
Like it or not Wests Ashfield own the club paid all debts owing by Balmain and to my knowledge are funding all Balmain junior leagues .
I do not understand why the club has not requested the media to report fact not fiction in regards to the club ! We as supporters have to accept and move forward with the realities as there is no advantage to anyone but seeing things as they are . Yes was a joint venture ..2021not anymore this is not divisive this is fact !

well the day we are called wests Magpies in NRL would be the day they can have membership back.

It wont happen... To over simplify the situation, the NRL actually owns the Licencing, and the clubs lease the "brands" from them. The Tiger has always polled as one of the strongest branding logo's world wide, they wouldnt let its slip away.

About the CC team being Magpies branded... to be honest, its financial to a point, alleviating some of the financial burden off the WT. The real shame in our CC being Magpies, is that we once had a leg up on the competition having both Tigers and Magpies in CC, meaning we had the ability to nurture twice the talent, and we merged them. That was the lost opportunity.

Old rusted on Magpies will remember being pushed out of Pratten Park, to Lidcombe, Humphries old man almost succeeding having booted us from the competition, then being forced out to Campbelltown... we lost fans everytime. Sure there is some militant old fogeys out there, but for the most part us old boys know how it feels to have your OG team put through the ringer, and dont wish it on Balmain either. Too much history to flush down the dunny.

Wests Ashfield has left the door open for Balmain to rise from the ashes, and goes about maintaining Balmains obligations to juniors without much fanfare. Their seats on the WT board returned when debt is repaid. I dont know how they could be any more compassionate to Balmains state of affairs, or why you are so upset.

[/QUOTE]

 

[the_third]

From DT:

Does anyone actually believe this tripe?

yeah nah

 

[the_third]

the rabble starts with Canterbury Cup
WE are WESTS TIGERS
play as them in every grade show some unity we are not Magpies we are tigers


That’s just petty

not petty I woukd say petty that Magpies are the Canterbury Cup side considering jersey flogged is wests tigers

No NRL side is represented in CC. They all have feeder teams. The Magpies are the WT’s feeder team.

others are not joint ventures either
we are a joint venture and should be represented equally in Canterbury Cup not just through one side that being Magpies
Roosters have newtown
Manly have blackthorn
again they are not Merged entities like Wests Tigers
it is divisive

The sooner all and sundry realise that the Weststigers are no longer a joint venture the better.
Like it or not Wests Ashfield own the club paid all debts owing by Balmain and to my knowledge are funding all Balmain junior leagues .
I do not understand why the club has not requested the media to report fact not fiction in regards to the club ! We as supporters have to accept and move forward with the realities as there is no advantage to anyone but seeing things as they are . Yes was a joint venture ..2021not anymore this is not divisive this is fact !

well the day we are called wests Magpies in NRL would be the day they can have membership back.

It wont happen... To over simplify the situation, the NRL actually owns the Licencing, and the clubs lease the "brands" from them. The Tiger has always polled as one of the strongest branding logo's world wide, they wouldnt let its slip away.

About the CC team being Magpies branded... to be honest, its financial to a point, alleviating some of the financial burden off the WT. The real shame in our CC being Magpies, is that we once had a leg up on the competition having both Tigers and Magpies in CC, meaning we had the ability to nurture twice the talent, and we merged them. That was the lost opportunity.

Old rusted on Magpies will remember being pushed out of Pratten Park, to Lidcombe, Humphries old man almost succeeding having booted us from the competition, then being forced out to Campbelltown... we lost fans everytime. Sure there is some militant old fogeys out there, but for the most part us old boys know how it feels to have your OG team put through the ringer, and dont wish it on Balmain either. Too much history to flush down the dunny.

Wests Ashfield has left the door open for Balmain to rise from the ashes, and goes about maintaining Balmains obligations to juniors without much fanfare. Their seats on the WT board returned when debt is repaid. I dont know how they could be any more compassionate to Balmains state of affairs, or why you are so upset.

top post

 

[BZN]

From DT:

Does anyone actually believe this tripe?

Definitely plausible. You wouldn't rule it out would you?


If it's by the DT then yes I would rule it out. They are completely despicable.

Wait, are they despicable rascals or rapscallions?

Rapscallions...wow!!!...:astonished: :+1:
You've just won the award for word of the day
@Magpieger