hobbo1
Well-known member
@mike said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411734) said:@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411363) said:@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411362) said:@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411360) said:@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411354) said:@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411351) said:@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411332) said:@2005magic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411324) said:I have heard on numerous occassions in pre match comments by Maguire that the team has trained well and practiced what they have to do and then they come out on to the field and play like headless chooks with no pattern / system to defence and little to no planning.
So, doesnt the truth then have to be that on the field of battle they are falling apart under pressure? Could it be that the leadership group isnt leading by example, the captain is not inspiring them (or not on the field), and the halfback is not organising, or most worryingly, the team is dogging it. While it is true there are many young-uns in the 17, there are also enough experienced old-uns to be able to take the pressure and help the others. Yet, they are not.
If they are doing totally opposite to what has been practised on training the culprit players are in the wrong and should be sacked. Surely contracts have in them undertaking coaches instructions. If the players think they n=know better tit cant go on.
Im all for replacing Maguire if we can find someone better, but the players behind all this should not, cannot, escape the axe. If they do get a new coach, they would have to accept the direction the club is going in and not go through another massive rebuild.
Questions are being asked of the coach about why he is reporting to the club that training is going well but that is not transferring to gameday.
That’s an interesting one. It feels like we have a pretty disconnected group which I’d imagine would also be fairly obvious through the week. Do people from the senior admin not go to training and watch? What are they doing? Certainly not winning in their meetings with player managers.
Going and watching training and understanding what is happening, whether the goals of the session are being achieved, if players are hitting data etc are different things. I don't expect Pascoe to be able to go to training and determine of the training session was successful. I would also be disappointed if he is spending all day at training.
With the right experience it’s easy to tell the difference between a really connected team and one that’s got issues. I think everything would just be humming if you watched Melbourne train. I imagine some of our fellas would stroll in and probably not even acknowledge each other. That’s how they’re playing anyway.
Yes but that is not the senior management role to see that, it is Madges role. That is why he is being asked those questions.
This is where we disagree mate, from top down I’d want football nous. They’re on big money and what exactly are they doing to win us games?
Edit: This is why I like the Sheens appointment.
Maybe you do but I don’t. This is not a sole trader or small business organisation where 1 person does everything. You have specialists for each area of the organisation. Not everyone has or should have football nous, that would not be a well functioning organisation.
The current model isn’t working too well it it !