Magpies vs Balmain - Campbelltown - SAT 3pm

@alien said:
why the hell was my post deleted? i have a right to have an opinion!

I deleted your post alien. Claiming the ref cost Wests the game is nothing short of pure unadulterated garbage. It's also why you were on mod preview for so long.
 
@Aladinsane said:
@galahs said:
now you admit to picking on elderly people :astonished:

Hey Galahs , was that you on the sunny eastern sideline screaming stuff to the Wests Team , no one in the Western stand could even understand…..sounded like Jim Bean fuelled rebel yell :smiley:

Nah, I don't like Jim Bean
 
@galahs said:
I have only met you twice in my life CT. Last weekend and a few weeks earlier at Leichhardt oval when you tried to run me down in your car!

You're not the only one he has tried to run down with his car.
 
@willow said:
@alien said:
why the hell was my post deleted? i have a right to have an opinion!

I deleted your post alien. Claiming the ref cost Wests the game is nothing short of pure unadulterated garbage. It's also why you were on mod preview for so long.

The ref did cost us the game. He wouldn't accept my bribes. (which is just as well for him because it was a black case full of monopoly money)
 
@willow said:
@alien said:
why the hell was my post deleted? i have a right to have an opinion!

I deleted your post alien. Claiming the ref cost Wests the game is nothing short of pure unadulterated garbage. It's also why you were on mod preview for so long.

That cheating ref made decisions against Western Suburbs that I disagreed with. If those calls didn't go against Western Suburbs then we definately could have won since it was a close game in the end. You have a right to disagree but deleting my post is just stupid.
 
@alien said:
@willow said:
@alien said:
why the hell was my post deleted? i have a right to have an opinion!

I deleted your post alien. Claiming the ref cost Wests the game is nothing short of pure unadulterated garbage. It's also why you were on mod preview for so long.

That cheating ref made decisions against Western Suburbs that I disagreed with. If those calls didn't go against Western Suburbs then we definately could have won since it was a close game in the end. You have a right to disagree but deleting my post is just stupid.

What calls? The calls where Keppa threw the ball to Balmain to score? The call where Keppa dropped the ball bringing it out of Wests end late in the second half? The rubbish kicking game from Wests?

You're seriously kidding yourself if you think the ref cost Wests the game, it shows your lack of knowledge. and you might want to obtain some proof before you accuse the ref of cheating. Both sides had their chances, Balmain simply made the most of theirs in the end. Deal with it.

And if you continue to post rusbbish like the post I deleted, I will continue to delete them alien.
 
As i recall, the ref piggy backed the Magpies out of their own red zone on a few occassions which weren't fair calls..So if anything the ref once again favoured the Magpies just like they did in the first clash between the two sides..
 
@willow said:
@alien said:
@willow said:
I deleted your post alien. Claiming the ref cost Wests the game is nothing short of pure unadulterated garbage. It's also why you were on mod preview for so long.

That cheating ref made decisions against Western Suburbs that I disagreed with. If those calls didn't go against Western Suburbs then we definately could have won since it was a close game in the end. You have a right to disagree but deleting my post is just stupid.

you might want to obtain some proof before you accuse the ref of cheating.

And if you continue to post rusbbish like the post I deleted, I will continue to delete them alien.

Proof??? :laughing: Yeah because all the posts on this forum contain proof don't they. :laughing: It's called an opinion which is what all posts on here are. You are just abusing your power on here.

If the roles were reversed I wouldn't delete your posts just because I didn't agree with it. You make alot of posts on here that I don't agree with either.
 
No alien, you made a statement, an incorrect one at that.

4\. Slander, hearsay, allegations, accusations or the statement of facts that cannot be proven will be removed and the offending user will be banned.
 
@willow said:
No alien, you made a statement, an incorrect one at that.

4\. Slander, hearsay, allegations, accusations or the statement of facts that cannot be proven will be removed and the offending user will be banned.

Heaps of people on this forum have called refs "cheats" on here. I guess it's only not acceptable when Balmain wins the match aye…
 
@alien said:
@willow said:
No alien, you made a statement, an incorrect one at that.

4\. Slander, hearsay, allegations, accusations or the statement of facts that cannot be proven will be removed and the offending user will be banned.

Heaps of people on this forum have called refs "cheats" on here. I guess it's only not acceptable when Balmain wins the match aye…

Reading isn't one of your strong points is it? Just to be clear, I did post this in regards to the match:

**Well I watched the match with Geo today, now it's no secret Geo supports Wests, however I didn't care who won to be honest, there were players in both teams I was keen to watch and see how they went.**

If you were still on mod preview your original post would not have seen the light of day alien. We've given you a chance by taking you off, but by all means, if you want to find yourself back on there, then continue down this path.
 
The ref did not cheat ….neither did Balmain...Wests turned over too much ball when it mattered...In short Wests were CRAP....THE END..... :brick:
 
@willow said:
If you were still on mod preview your original post would not have seen the light of day alien. We've given you a chance by taking you off, but by all means, if you want to find yourself back on there, then continue down this path.

I was asking why my post was deleted. There isn't anything wrong with asking that question. I don't care if you don't agree with my opinion about something but you shouldn't have deleted my post just because you thought it wasn't true. Howcome the other 1000 posts on here where people have called a ref a "cheat" are not deleted?
 
@alien said:
@willow said:
If you were still on mod preview your original post would not have seen the light of day alien. We've given you a chance by taking you off, but by all means, if you want to find yourself back on there, then continue down this path.

I was asking why my post was deleted. There isn't anything wrong with asking that question. I don't care if you don't agree with my opinion about something but you shouldn't have deleted my post just because you thought it wasn't true. Howcome the other 1000 posts on here where people have called a ref a "cheat" are not deleted?

I didn't delete your post asking why your previous post was deleted. I have explained this to you already alien. Move on and stop going around in circles.
 
@willow said:
I didn't delete your post asking why your previous post was deleted. I have explained this to you already alien. Move on and stop going around in circles.

I asked why my post was deleted and you basically said it was because you didn't agree with my opinion.

And I'm not going around in circles. My name isn't Daniel.
 
You had your chance alien. Reading definitely isn't one of your strong points:

4\. Slander, hearsay, allegations, accusations or the statement of facts that cannot be proven will be removed and the offending user will be banned.

Please read that, that is why your post was deleted. We have declined well over 100 of your posts since this forum opened because they violate forum rules. This thread will close if you continue to make an issue out of it.
 
Back
Top