Maguire Signs Until End of 2023

@gallagher said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225078) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1224972) said:
@WT2K said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1224940) said:
Chammas reporting WT to give Madge one year extension

I don’t think he necessarily deserves it but for the sake of stability probably a sensible move. Any more than 1 year would be stupid.

I think that's a bit insulting TBH. A 1 year deal suggests they arnt sold on him.

Newspaper propaganda until it’s official .. News of only a one year extension creates uncertainty and sells newspapers
 
Madge is continuing to impress me.

As a Leader he has an element that refuses to compromise on standards on the field. He is willing to be the front man on decisions regardless pf the PR impact it has.

He is 100% the man to continue to forge our club to where we as the die hard fans have dreamed about since 2000.
 
Here is the details why...

1 more year 2021 to continue the deadwood and then minimum 2 years to recruit and build and show the fruit of the previous years.

I thinks some clubs like the Drags and the dogs would kill for top tier coach like our Madge!
 
@Cultured_Bogan said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225164) said:
Give him two years. Giving him one year with a full chequebook doesn't suggest the club trusts him to deliver.

His only KPI Measure he has, is to get the side into the top 8.
TBH if he doesn’t achieve that next year or looks unlikely to do it the year after, then he should go.
 
@TigerWest said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225167) said:
@Cultured_Bogan said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225164) said:
Give him two years. Giving him one year with a full chequebook doesn't suggest the club trusts him to deliver.

His only KPI Measure he has, is to get the side into the top 8.
TBH if he doesn’t achieve that next year or looks unlikely to do it the year after, then he should go.

I would not be against that. His extension should be applicable.
 
@gallagher said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225085) said:
@TrueTiger said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225081) said:
@gallagher said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225078) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1224972) said:
@WT2K said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1224940) said:
Chammas reporting WT to give Madge one year extension

I don’t think he necessarily deserves it but for the sake of stability probably a sensible move. Any more than 1 year would be stupid.

I think that's a bit insulting TBH. A 1 year deal suggests they arnt sold on him.

Im with you gal,but maybe they are just being cautious with whats happened to coaches and giving them long term contracts...Siebold comes to mind..

Possibly. Although 3 years (including next) is suitable to where the team is at.

Wouldn't it be smarter to give him 1 more year (which is another 2 seasons) from now, and then extend again next year if we're seeing some improvement?
 
**Tigers to re-sign Maguire but Reynolds, Packer drama highlights issues**

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/tigers-to-re-sign-maguire-but-reynolds-packer-drama-highlights-issues-20200905-p55sre.html

By Michael Chammas
Updated September 6, 2020

The Wests Tigers are moving to silence the deafening noise surrounding the tenure of their coach, set to hand Michael Maguire a one year contract extension despite more cause for concern emerging on Sunday.

A week of conjecture around the coach's relationship with his players ended with revelations out-of-favour duo Josh Reynolds and Russell Packer left Saturday night's game against Manly at half time.

When contacted by the Herald on Sunday night, Reynolds declined to comment. However sources close to the club said Reynolds, whose behaviour was out of character given his reputation as the ultimate team player, was privately fuming over suggestions that he walked out because he couldn't handle the cold.

The five-eighth, despite being told to find a new home on half a dozen occasions, wasn't required to attend the match but turned up to support his teammates, before leaving at half time.

"It's not a good look for two of our players to leave at half time," chairman Lee Hagipantelis told the Herald.

"Strictly speaking, they weren't required to be there. Russell had to warm up with the team as 19th man but Josh didn't even warm up with the team. Both players have acknowledged their action creates a perception, but perception is not reality.

"I have spoken to both of them and they've acknowledge it wasn't a good look. There was no intention on their part to show disrespect or a lack of unity. Russell suffers from an arthritic condition and had multiple surgeries in his foot to try and help him play again. Sitting there in the cold does affect him, that is true."

The players' inability to see out the match in the stands reflects poorly, but again highlights the disconnect that the club wants addressed in the offseason when it sits down with Maguire to map out its plan for the future.

The Wests Tigers has been a revolving door of coaches in recent years and the club is determined to make sure Maguire isn't added to the list, with the former South Sydney premiership-winning mentor to be given an extension on his contract despite already being locked in at the joint venture until the end of 2021.

It's an incredible show of faith when you consider the noise surrounding Maguire's tenure at the club. The murmurs of discontent in the playing ranks keep bubbling along, not to mention the fact the Tigers are likely to miss the finals for a second straight year under his watch despite a miraculous come-from-behind win against Manly on Saturday night.

The Tigers would be well within their rights to sit back and see how next year unfolds before making a decision. That's the safe play considering he still has another year to run on his deal and, to put it bluntly, rival clubs are not exactly lining up for his services.

But in a strong message to the players, some of whom are privately questioning whether he is in fact the right man to lead them out of a decade-long finals slumber, the board and executives will in the coming months add another year to Maguire's incumbency.

The Tigers and, for the large part, their success-starved fans, believe Maguire is the right man. They are behind his no-nonsense approach and want him to add a hard edge to a club long regarded for its soft underbelly.

They also know where there's smoke, there's fire. The issue involving Packer and Reynolds is evidence of that. Packer and Reynolds didn't break any rules when they left the game. Some of their teammates who weren't playing didn't even show up at all, but it's a bad look nonetheless.

The players must take responsibility for their poor choices, but there's also an onus on Maguire to evolve in the off-season and address some of the issues with his coaching style that has affected his relationship with several players at his last two clubs.

There's a misconception that the issues arise from how hard Maguire trains his players, that they can't stomach his military-like regime. The real problem stems around his communication skills, and a feeling he avoids the tough conversations.

Like when he asked Benji Marshall and Robbie Farah to approach Moses Mbye about stepping away from the captaincy last year, instead of having the conversation himself. Or, just last week, when he struggled to tell Marshall he wasn't required in 2021, asking the veteran playmaker to "give him 24 hours" despite already reaching a decision with the club he wasn't part of their plans going forward.

Maguire has the runs on the board. No one is questioning his rugby league IQ or his ability to prepare a football team. But a generational transition in players has prompted debate over how compatible his philosophies are with the modern-day footballer.

It was evident last year in how he handled Ryan Matterson, a player who came to the club from the Sydney Roosters with a reputation for requiring a cuddle - or three - to get the best out of him. Maguire is from a different school. The type that brings baseball bats and boa constrictors into dressing rooms to get his point across. Mollycoddling delicate footballers is not in his nature.

The Tigers possess a roster built by Ivan Cleary with personalities that suit an Ivan Cleary-coached team. Maguire will get his team in 2022, when the salary cap frees up in the first season of his forthcoming extension, but what he does between now and then will have a huge impact on whether he can attract Maguire-type footballers to the club.

Tigers powerbrokers know the club is not in a position to let quality footballers walk out the door, or turn players off joining, if it can be avoided by the coach learning to relate on a different level.

Sometimes a teaspoon of cement isn't the only remedy.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225197) said:
@gallagher said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225085) said:
@TrueTiger said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225081) said:
@gallagher said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225078) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1224972) said:
@WT2K said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1224940) said:
Chammas reporting WT to give Madge one year extension

I don’t think he necessarily deserves it but for the sake of stability probably a sensible move. Any more than 1 year would be stupid.

I think that's a bit insulting TBH. A 1 year deal suggests they arnt sold on him.

Im with you gal,but maybe they are just being cautious with whats happened to coaches and giving them long term contracts...Siebold comes to mind..

Possibly. Although 3 years (including next) is suitable to where the team is at.

Wouldn't it be smarter to give him 1 more year (which is another 2 seasons) from now, and then extend again next year if we're seeing some improvement?

I think they will go 2 myself...

1 year doesn't help that much with recruiting...
 
@TigerWest said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225167) said:
@Cultured_Bogan said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225164) said:
Give him two years. Giving him one year with a full chequebook doesn't suggest the club trusts him to deliver.

His only KPI Measure he has, is to get the side into the top 8.
TBH if he doesn’t achieve that next year or looks unlikely to do it the year after, then he should go.


WHilst the logic of that position is obvious, if he isnt given better cattle to deal with, what is likely to change to get us in the 8? This squad is not a top 8 squad and to date Madge is not responsible. IMO he needs the time and resources to fix squad first.
 
@Geo said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225267) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225197) said:
@gallagher said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225085) said:
@TrueTiger said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225081) said:
@gallagher said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1225078) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1224972) said:
@WT2K said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1224940) said:
Chammas reporting WT to give Madge one year extension

I don’t think he necessarily deserves it but for the sake of stability probably a sensible move. Any more than 1 year would be stupid.

I think that's a bit insulting TBH. A 1 year deal suggests they arnt sold on him.

Im with you gal,but maybe they are just being cautious with whats happened to coaches and giving them long term contracts...Siebold comes to mind..

Possibly. Although 3 years (including next) is suitable to where the team is at.

Wouldn't it be smarter to give him 1 more year (which is another 2 seasons) from now, and then extend again next year if we're seeing some improvement?

I think they will go 2 myself...

1 year doesn't help that much with recruiting...

My thoughts too.
 
@Elderslie_Tiger said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1256590) said:
Apparently Madge has verbally agreed to 2 year extension until 2023

Where is that information coming from?
 
@jadtiger said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1256592) said:
@Elderslie_Tiger said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1256590) said:
Apparently Madge has verbally agreed to 2 year extension until 2023

Where is that information coming from?

Big Sports Breakfast and Telegraph
 
@Elderslie_Tiger said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1256590) said:
Apparently Madge has verbally agreed to 2 year extension until 2023

Well that’s rewarding mediocrity... something this club does well ! Maybe some runs on the board before rewarding this smells like desperation once again ..
 
@Elderslie_Tiger said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1256593) said:
@jadtiger said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1256592) said:
@Elderslie_Tiger said in [Maguire \- Contract Thread\.\.](/post/1256590) said:
Apparently Madge has verbally agreed to 2 year extension until 2023

Where is that information coming from?

Big Sports Breakfast and Telegraph

Thanks but i wouldnt believe DT in any circumstances the other mob i hope is more reliable
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top