Manly drama

Sounds like they are trying to save money this year and frontend to cancel out the future fines.

Bit dodgy but I am sure the NRL will allow it.
 
Posted on this in the signings and rumours thread regarding Hastings, they do still have a hooker in Joey Lussick, yet have named a development player (Fainu) ahead of him expecting approval from the NRL. Unlike the Bulldogs they refuse to offload their better players to ease their cap problems but instead try to get around it by doing dodgy deeds.
 
It is the Farah issue happening to Manly the dominate player ruling the decisions the coach and club are taking ..DCE runs Manly as did Farah at one time with the Tigers.
 
@ said:
It is the Farah issue happening to Manly the dominate player ruling the decisions the coach and club are taking ..DCE runs Manly as did Farah at one time with the Tigers.

We might find Floggah back to his old tricks again soon
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Watmough sounds like a scorn lover.
Airing out all the dirty laundry ?

Nrl just denied manly picking their young hooker and told em to use one of Lewis Brown, Jackson Hastings or Tom Wright.

Surprised Watmough didn't throw some coins at DCE's melon. That's what he usually does to his ex's by all reports .

Watmough should be the last player to cast the first stone. 😱pen_mouth:

Wait…what? :laughing:
 
I remember when we played Corey Paterson on the wing cause we had no one to do the job. These guys can play a centre at hooker as far as I'm concerned, but they won't because they are Manly and they get their way.
 
Back
Top