Manly Inclusive Pride jersey backlash

[69-05-41]

 

[twentyforty]

Good to see Manly divided over this. Josh Aloiai to spokesperson for the 7.
Foran leaving next year, Davey going. Taupas and Josh Schuster wanting out

Apparently Manly had to hire an independent mediator to find some common ground between the players.
I guess the inclusivity attempt actually had the reverse affect?
Possibly the only way to sort this issue is to have a quota, with each club having in their top 30 an equal number of LGBTQIA and religious worshiping players?
This has worked well for women in work places?

 

[1eyedmel]

Has it been reported that shuster wants out of manly or are we just hoping on here. If so is there any interest from the tigers in signing him.

 

[earl]

Apparently Manly had to hire an independent mediator to find some common ground between the players.
I guess the inclusivity attempt actually had the reverse affect?
Possibly the only way to sort this issue is to have a quota, with each club having in their top 30 an equal number of LGBTQIA and religious worshiping players?
This has worked well for women in work places?

This leads to a bunch of questions:-

1. Do you believe that wearing a jersey supporting the LGBT community has something to do with women's quotas ? If so can you explain how they are related ?
2. Are you homophobic ?
3. Are you supportive of homophobia ?
4. When you are referring to religious worshiping players are you talking about people that practice religion or are you talking about people that define non-heterosexual practices as a sin and immoral ?
5. Do you think you can be religious and not have bigoted views towards the LGBT community ?
6. Do you have any proof that quotas haven't worked for women in work places ?
7. Are you just talking about quotas or all societal changes bought on by feminism such as women being able to vote ?
8. Do you believe that inclusion means being supportive of racism or pedophilia or religious terrorism ?
9. If you are against any of these practices (in question 8) do you believe that inclusion in these instances is wrong ?

 

[earl]

Has it been reported that shuster wants out of manly or are we just hoping on here. If so is there any interest from the tigers in signing him.

I think there was interest in him from the Tigers that has nothing at all to do with this issue. Schuster isn't getting a lot of game time and he will probably be replaced by Kelma when Kelma gets there.

There were stories Schuster wanted out of Manly prior to this issue being raised.

 

[The SHADOW]

This leads to a bunch of questions:-

1. Do you believe that wearing a jersey supporting the LGBT community has something to do with women's quotas ? If so can you explain how they are related ?
2. Are you homophobic ?
3. Are you supportive of homophobia ?
4. When you are referring to religious worshiping players are you talking about people that practice religion or are you talking about people that define non-heterosexual practices as a sin and immoral ?
5. Do you think you can be religious and not have bigoted views towards the LGBT community ?
6. Do you have any proof that quotas haven't worked for women in work places ?
7. Are you just talking about quotas or all societal changes bought on by feminism such as women being able to vote ?
8. Are you supportive of racists ?
9. Do you believe that inclusion means being supportive of racism or pedophilia or religious terrorism ?
10. If you are against any of these practices (in question 9) do you believe that inclusion in these instances is wrong ?

The bus left last week, next bus can take you back.

 

[earl]

The bus left last week, next bus can take you back.

It's a big issue and I assume it's going to be an ongoing big issue.

 

[The SHADOW]

Get the signs up at Manly HQ

 

[Merlot]

It's a big issue and I assume it's going to be an ongoing big issue.

the lack of buses or all that other nonsense ?

 

[PJ2]

Benj needs to go after fat ass Schuster.
Great player.
Also screw manly, couldn't happen to a better club...

 

[The SHADOW]

Benj needs to go after fat ass Schuster.
Great player.
Also screw manly, couldn't happen to a better club...

Dosent seem like th character we need.

 

[earl]

the lack of buses or all that other nonsense ?

You know what would have made it a non issue - the players wearing the jersey.

 

[earl]

Dosent seem like th character we need.

When he is on he is an awesome player. The problem is that he looks like he might not put the effort in to play to his potential.

 

[innsaneink]

I'm surprised someone hasn't been offended by or wants to change the name of "manly" to something else

 

[The SHADOW]

I'm surprised someone hasn't been offended by or wants to change the name of "manly" to something else

Well what about Blacktown.

 

[The SHADOW]

You know what would have made it a non issue - the players wearing the jersey.

Don’t pls don’t

 

[earl]

Don’t pls don’t

It's true though right. Why make this issue into an issue ?

Anyway - what do you do ?

 

[Magpie_Magic]

Benj needs to go after fat ass Schuster.
Great player.
Also screw manly, couldn't happen to a better club...

Maybe put Saab to the bus as well.

 

[twentyforty]

This leads to a bunch of questions:-

1. Do you believe that wearing a jersey supporting the LGBT community has something to do with women's quotas ? If so can you explain how they are related ?
2. Are you homophobic ?
3. Are you supportive of homophobia ?
4. When you are referring to religious worshiping players are you talking about people that practice religion or are you talking about people that define non-heterosexual practices as a sin and immoral ?
5. Do you think you can be religious and not have bigoted views towards the LGBT community ?
6. Do you have any proof that quotas haven't worked for women in work places ?
7. Are you just talking about quotas or all societal changes bought on by feminism such as women being able to vote ?
8. Do you believe that inclusion means being supportive of racism or pedophilia or religious terrorism ?
9. If you are against any of these practices (in question 8) do you believe that inclusion in these instances is wrong ?

Not worthy of a response.

 

[earl]

Not worthy of a response.

That isn't being intellectually honest. Just state that your theories can't stand up to those trivial questions.