Martin Kennedy

Kennedy is a good prospect, struggling to be effective at times but the signs are there for a good career ahead of him.

Would be happy if we signed him.
 
Sign Tolman and Kennedy and there is a forward pack for you.

8\. Woods
9\. Farah
10\. Galloway
11\. Pettybourne
12\. Fulton
13\. Blair

14\. Buchanan
15\. Tollman
16\. Kennedy
17\. Sironen
 
I think what MacDougall means is that the sort of football Rose plays is not similar to our pack and wouldn't slot in as easy as someone like Kennedy. I have no doubt Potter could fit him up a bit. Rose does a good job out at Manly and he definitely suits under strict coaching styles.
 
@Newtown said:
Memo to Wests Tigers Management: Is Wests Tigers finally going to sign two much needed prop forwards?

answer in a nut shell, hell no, they will wait and think then see if sponsors and fan think its a good idea then say no.

just heard on TV tolman signed for the EELS, good work tiger recruitment.
 
@bp tiger said:
@Newtown said:
Memo to Wests Tigers Management: Is Wests Tigers finally going to sign two much needed prop forwards?

answer in a nut shell, hell no, they will wait and think then see if sponsors and fan think its a good idea then say no.

just heard on TV tolman signed for the EELS, good work tiger recruitment.

What does Tolman signing with the eels have to do with our recruitment?

Good player yes but not the type of prop we need. We have enough work horse type players we need some mongrels

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@derailed said:
@bp tiger said:
@Newtown said:
Memo to Wests Tigers Management: Is Wests Tigers finally going to sign two much needed prop forwards?

answer in a nut shell, hell no, they will wait and think then see if sponsors and fan think its a good idea then say no.

just heard on TV tolman signed for the EELS, good work tiger recruitment.

What does Tolman signing with the eels have to do with our recruitment?

Good player yes but not the type of prop we need. We have enough work horse type players we need some mongrels

Who do you suggest for a suitable prop? There have been at at least 15 different props suggested in this forum over the past two months and Wests Tigers have not been able to recruit anyone of them.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@bp tiger said:
@Newtown said:
Memo to Wests Tigers Management: Is Wests Tigers finally going to sign two much needed prop forwards?

answer in a nut shell, hell no, they will wait and think then see if sponsors and fan think its a good idea then say no.

just heard on TV tolman signed for the EELS, good work tiger recruitment.

Would you pay $650k a year for Tolman? I certainly wouldn't.
 
yes there is a lot of things been said, but do we really know if the club is fair dinkum. we lose ellis this year and heigno, and we buy 3 NSW cup type forwards. we had the best crop of frontrowers coming throw in woods fifita along with gibbs and we let them go to get blair, u work it out.
 
West Tigers paid $500 k on a four year dea; for a forward who still has to make an impact. Based on that you are right $650k is well overs. By the way if Tolman is costing $650k a year I wonder what Sonny Bill Williams would be costing the Roosters?
 
@willow said:
@bp tiger said:
@Newtown said:
Memo to Wests Tigers Management: Is Wests Tigers finally going to sign two much needed prop forwards?

answer in a nut shell, hell no, they will wait and think then see if sponsors and fan think its a good idea then say no.

just heard on TV tolman signed for the EELS, good work tiger recruitment.

Would you pay $650k a year for Tolman? I certainly wouldn't.

NO, willow not worth it but that not the point at least they are trying to do something about ther situation. its better to throw money at a decent player than buy 3 would bees like we bought, give me tolman over them any day.
 
@Newtown said:
@derailed said:
@bp tiger said:
@Newtown said:
Memo to Wests Tigers Management: Is Wests Tigers finally going to sign two much needed prop forwards?

answer in a nut shell, hell no, they will wait and think then see if sponsors and fan think its a good idea then say no.

just heard on TV tolman signed for the EELS, good work tiger recruitment.

What does Tolman signing with the eels have to do with our recruitment?

Good player yes but not the type of prop we need. We have enough work horse type players we need some mongrels

Who do you suggest for a suitable prop? There have been at at least 15 different props suggested in this forum over the past two months and Wests Tigers have not been able to recruit anyone of them.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

I would go hard for Pritchard - He can go missing yes be can also be lethal.

Weyman would also be a good pick with a lot of experience and he has carried the dragons pack.

I agree everyone has been naming props left right and centre but how many has the club gone after?
 
He's done nothing in a while. He only ever looked good and that was a game against us a few years ago.

He's not yet 30 or been injured for us to buy him.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
The roosters fans hate Kenedy, he is their forums version of Tim Moltzen.
He had a wonderful game against us a few years back, but in general think he is a plodder.

We need a prop, so he'll do, but IMO he is not the lightening bolt solution to our problems.

Ive never rated Rose, even as a kid at Penrith thought he was very lazy.

of the available props not running around in first grade, the best for me is defintely Dayne Weston, I really like him as a player
 
Kennedy is a nuffy. The only good games he has played against us because we love making average players look like superstars.

With that being said he is a prop and not at the end of his career so if he was available I would sign him.
 
Give me Kennedy any day before playing Eddie or The Bludger at prop. He has the size and age to be a great recruit. But knowing the way Wazza works we will end with no one or a no name.
 
I rate Kennedy…...Id def be interested in him.

He isnt getting much of a go at the rorters.

Not worried about Tolman at all......his 6 metres per hit up we already have, thanks but no thanks.
 
Back
Top