Martin Tapau offers a few highlight reel plays every couple of weeks.
He has the 'potential' to dominate.
But isn't he 25 or so? He isn't going to improve dramatically from this point in his career. He's a 'shock trooper' type player, one which can be effective in the right team.
He is not going to make this side a finals team.
He's the Kiwi Dave Taylor.
Suaso Sue is a much more promising and well rounded forward. Ava is a better prop.
You could probably get the same kind of impact, over the course of a full season, from someone like JJ Felise.
Losing Tapau does not sink the club. He's an extremely well built, athletic guy. And likeable.
But he's not the saviour of this club. The Tigers need professional, hard nosed players to give them a winning edge. And to bring the best out of the young players in the club.
I would not consider Tapau's flamboyant 'big plays' hard nosed or consistant enough.
Crikey you are either extremely difficult to please or its sour grapes. Now a player has to be our "saviour" for us to be upset about him leaving? What the?
Tapau is probably the forward in the game with the most potential to be a consistent game-breaker, just like Fifita, Waerea-Hargreaves and even Dave Taylor. All huge and potentially very damaging. We have always needed a pack that competes with the bigger boppers and he is exactly the size we have cried out for for years. So, if any of us Tigers fans are not completely rope-able that Taupau is leaving then that will do me. Yes, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but if that opinion is one that suggests we don't need Taupau then as far as I'm concerned it is an opinion worth disregarding. Just like the opinions that floated around years ago that we didn't need Thurston, Cronk, DCE or Folau.