Missed E T

Unfortunately the game consists of 50% attack.
If only you could just pick the best players by the amount of tackles they made, be so much easier.
 
@ said:
We have been missing ET big time:

https://imgur.com/a/6ScitzR

He eases the pressure on everyone else, giving us more sting in attack.

We're also missing Packer. He's no 80 minute man but has a big workload when he's on the field.

Missing 3 of our top 5 defenders has been killing us. Twal has been a very underrated lose for mine.
 
@ said:
@ said:
We have been missing ET big time:

https://imgur.com/a/6ScitzR

He eases the pressure on everyone else, giving us more sting in attack.

We're also missing Packer. He's no 80 minute man but has a big workload when he's on the field.

Missing 3 of our top 5 defenders has been killing us. Twal has been a very underrated lose for mine.

Twal and et were big outs for us.
 
With what has been debated as ET’s impact in attack being far less effective than his defensive impact I think it is a no brainer for ET to start at hooker. 30 mins to take the sting out of the game than allow Liddle to come into the game at his own pace. This can go on until Liddle adapts to 80mins.
ET has a great pass on him and in that stage of the game there is no running options available for a hooker as the defence is very tight. Let him get sharp ball to the forwards and halves and then bring Liddle on mid way through the game to scheme his way around the ruck.
I base this on my opinion that ET has a slight edge in defence over Eiso at Lock but ET has a massive edge over Godinet in defence In the middle. In attack Eiso posses a better attacking threat that ET at lock and I think ET can’t be much worse than Godinet at hooker in regards to delivery and reading a game.
 
Back
Top