Moltzen's decision to stay with Tigers cost us dearly

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
@innsaneink said:
@chickenkebabs said:
Anyone else bags three to down the dragons there would be threads proFessing undying love everywhere. With moltzen it's crickets. The hate on the guy is near pathological.

Thats probably because some people what he did, the way he acted and the way he brought crap on this club during the off season will never be forgotten.
When a man runs, cowers, hides and doesnt face up to his responsibilities, no amount of anything else will redeem himself - he needs to deal with his unfinished business that dragged the club through the sewer. Only then might some see him as a man - hard to respect right now - despite any amount of good footy being played

Rip in.

Our club is just as responsible for that debacle. It was our club who didn't release him, it was our club that hedged its bets until the last moment then decided to allow/enforce Moltzens contract.

Moltzens contract with Dragons becomes legitimate if Tigers grants the release.
 
Went to the dragons section on the LU forums to gloat a little on Moltzen's hat trick.

Was surprised to see tigers supporters backing the dragons fans in laying the slipper in to him.

His contract drama was not ideal, but it isn't a capital offence.

He's a great player and I'm stoked to have him on the squad.

Go tigers.
 
We all see things differently chicken
LaT- yeh Im aware Tauber & Humphrey played their parts too….TM was probably the meat in the s'wich
 
@innsaneink said:
Your sarcasm tells me you still dont understand the difference between supporting, and representing.
Not to worry

Well you know the difference apparently. Educate me.
 
@innsaneink said:
We all see things differently chicken
LaT- yeh Im aware Tauber & Humphrey played their parts too….TM was probably the meat in the s'wich

This. If Moltzen still wanted out, he'd have had the release granted. I can't see WT keeping a player against his will.
 
@innsaneink said:
We all see things differently chicken
LaT- yeh Im aware Tauber & Humphrey played their parts too….TM was probably the meat in the s'wich

That's fair. I'm not trying to stir trouble, just wanted to make a point.
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
@innsaneink said:
We all see things differently chicken
LaT- yeh Im aware Tauber & Humphrey played their parts too….TM was probably the meat in the s'wich

This. If Moltzen still wanted out, he'd have had the release granted. I can't see WT keeping a player against his will.

If its ok to lay the boot into Moltzen for not following through on his commitments, then our club comes into the firing line for the exact same reason.

Its unfair to give a pass to one party but not the other.
 
The threads about Moltz, a question was posed as to the dislike for him….he's the face of it all I guess, the other parties are behind the scenes somewhat and can easily be overlooked.
 
@LaT said:
@Cultured Bogan said:
@innsaneink said:
We all see things differently chicken
LaT- yeh Im aware Tauber & Humphrey played their parts too….TM was probably the meat in the s'wich

This. If Moltzen still wanted out, he'd have had the release granted. I can't see WT keeping a player against his will.

If its ok to lay the boot into Moltzen for not following through on his commitments, then our club comes into the firing line for the exact same reason.

Its unfair to give a pass to one party but not the other.

I've said previously in other threads that WT and Tauber have a case to answer as well.
 
what's done is done. like him or not, like tauber or not, like humpty or not. put this in their negatives column and when the club is struggling, remind them of everything and show how much they have learnt or not.

off field decisions shouldn't be the ones making headlines.
 
@tig_prmz said:
what's done is done. like him or not, like tauber or not, like humpty or not. put this in their negatives column and when the club is struggling, remind them of everything and show how much they have learnt or not.

off field decisions shouldn't be the ones making headlines.

Which brings me back to my point. Moltzen played well and was applauded in the media.

Yet, the silence on this forum was deafening.
 
@chickenkebabs said:
@tig_prmz said:
what's done is done. like him or not, like tauber or not, like humpty or not. put this in their negatives column and when the club is struggling, remind them of everything and show how much they have learnt or not.

off field decisions shouldn't be the ones making headlines.

Which brings me back to my point. Moltzen played well and was applauded in the media.

Yet, the silence on this forum was deafening.

people would find it hard to cheer this guy and i dont have any problems with that. it's just seeing that this topic has 3 pages which i dont like. i dont wanna tell others to build a bridge and get over it.

just put this performance into moltzen's positive column if you think he played well…
 
@chickenkebabs said:
@tig_prmz said:
what's done is done. like him or not, like tauber or not, like humpty or not. put this in their negatives column and when the club is struggling, remind them of everything and show how much they have learnt or not.

off field decisions shouldn't be the ones making headlines.

Which brings me back to my point. Moltzen played well and was applauded in the media.

Yet, the silence on this forum was deafening.

Maybe its superstition, like not changing undies during a winning streak.
 
@tig_prmz said:
@chickenkebabs said:
@tig_prmz said:
what's done is done. like him or not, like tauber or not, like humpty or not. put this in their negatives column and when the club is struggling, remind them of everything and show how much they have learnt or not.

off field decisions shouldn't be the ones making headlines.

Which brings me back to my point. Moltzen played well and was applauded in the media.

Yet, the silence on this forum was deafening.

people would find it hard to cheer this guy and i dont have any problems with that. it's just seeing that this topic has 3 pages which i dont like. i dont wanna tell others to build a bridge and get over it.

just put this performance into moltzen's positive column if you think he played well…

They can't cheer for him because…...
 
@LaT said:
@innsaneink said:
@chickenkebabs said:
Anyone else bags three to down the dragons there would be threads proFessing undying love everywhere. With moltzen it's crickets. The hate on the guy is near pathological.

Thats probably because some people what he did, the way he acted and the way he brought crap on this club during the off season will never be forgotten.
When a man runs, cowers, hides and doesnt face up to his responsibilities, no amount of anything else will redeem himself - he needs to deal with his unfinished business that dragged the club through the sewer. Only then might some see him as a man - hard to respect right now - despite any amount of good footy being played

Rip in.

Our club is just as responsible for that debacle. It was our club who didn't release him, it was our club that hedged its bets until the last moment then decided to allow/enforce Moltzens contract.

Moltzens contract with Dragons becomes legitimate if Tigers grants the release.

When the dragons came out last year and announced the signing on the eve of our game, Humphries said that we have not released Tim… I don't believe that there was a back flip from that position... More fool the dragons for not chasing up on it until too late in the season...
 
@TripleB said:
@LaT said:
@innsaneink said:
@chickenkebabs said:
Anyone else bags three to down the dragons there would be threads proFessing undying love everywhere. With moltzen it's crickets. The hate on the guy is near pathological.

Thats probably because some people what he did, the way he acted and the way he brought crap on this club during the off season will never be forgotten.
When a man runs, cowers, hides and doesnt face up to his responsibilities, no amount of anything else will redeem himself - he needs to deal with his unfinished business that dragged the club through the sewer. Only then might some see him as a man - hard to respect right now - despite any amount of good footy being played

Rip in.

Our club is just as responsible for that debacle. It was our club who didn't release him, it was our club that hedged its bets until the last moment then decided to allow/enforce Moltzens contract.

Moltzens contract with Dragons becomes legitimate if Tigers grants the release.

When the dragons came out last year and announced the signing on the eve of our game, Humphreys said that we have not released Tim… I don't believe that there was a back flip from that position... More fool the dragons for not chasing up on it until too late in the season...

We sat on the release. Dragons/Tauber and even Moltzen thought he was moving there for 2012\. When it suited us and T Moltzen we all just said "nope, contract still stands".

It was unethical conduct and made the entire club look bad. I don't ever want Wests Tigers to pull this sort of crap again.
 
If Lui hadn't bought a case of vodka cruisers, Moltzen would be at Kogarah. He'd be hating it to.

Correct me if I'm wrong.
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
@innsaneink said:
We all see things differently chicken
LaT- yeh Im aware Tauber & Humphrey played their parts too….TM was probably the meat in the s'wich

This. If Moltzen still wanted out, he'd have had the release granted. I can't see WT keeping a player against his will.

He never wanted to leave in the first place!
 
Back
Top