More bad behaviour

[goldcoast_tiger]

I am totally over NRL players and in particular Wests Tigers players bringing our club down…

The WT should have a **zero tolerance** policy to any players being charged by the police...they should immediately be stood down from the club and if proven guilty their contract torn up no if's, and's or but's....

When was the last time you read a Sydney Kings (or any NBL) player in trouble with the law....or lets take this further a Sydney FC or WSW player...?.
\
\
The NRL should come down hard on these fools.!

League is a mugs game, played by meatheads.

Players from basket ball or a number of sports, could mug someone in stark daylight and most probably no one one would recognise them anyway.
A NRL player only has to sneeze the wrong way, and a dozen phones spring out of pockets, When will some of these drongos realise that, and even the thickest of them ,get the message?
There’s a lot of players in the NRL, who know how to act like a human,
A pity that they get bundled in with the cretinous minority who are not capable of sane thinking,
I couldn’t care less if the League booted anyone who brings the game into disrepute, get rid of them

 

[newtiger]

Another long year… Dunno why I bother

I reckon. Everyone complains that they're human and they have lives etc, but you honestly believe that if the CEO of Qantas bashed a cabbie he'd not get the punt for it?

Keeping your nose clean is a small price to pay for the cheque you bring home.

If the CEO of Qantas bashed a cabbie it would be with his handbag.

 

[larrycorowa]

Investigate quickly, make a determination on what happened, weigh everything up and then make a decision and move on.

 

[newtiger]

Wests Tigers have been made aware of an incident involving a player on December 30, 2018.

The club is working with the NRL Integrity Unit on the matter and will be making no further comment at this stage.
https://www.weststigers.com.au/news/2019/01/03/wests-tigers-statement/

Who issued the statement Pascoe?

 

[Geo]

Wests Tigers have been made aware of an incident involving a player on December 30, 2018.

The club is working with the NRL Integrity Unit on the matter and will be making no further comment at this stage.
https://www.weststigers.com.au/news/2019/01/03/wests-tigers-statement/

You can tell by that statement that Pascoe is not running the club

Don't think he runs the other 15 Clubs ither considering it's the standard statement they ALL use…

 

[Swordy]

I'm over this sh#t!!!!!

Get rid of him NOW !!!

 

[Defiant]

Imo positive news.

If found guilty along with the South's guy we have surely fixed our cap up.

 

[kiwitiger]

I do wonder how Chris Lawrence or other civilised team mates of these Richard craniums feel about them at times. Imagine in your workplace having people like this you have to see everyday and interact with. Why would you. You must really love the game to do it. So over it…love the game...really starting to hate the participants.

 

[Snake]

There is a god MCK is a plodder and taking up cap space for a young someone that actually might work out and be of benefit I am sure Madge has someone already lined up ,this news has a negative edge but a very positive outcome tear up the contract and move on immediately… another DH !

 

[JD Tiger]

I wonder what's the point?

What's the bet that he ends up going to the Dogs or Eels before the season starts? We punt him, and he won't be without a club for more than a week.

So now I'm thinking we may as well fine him, dock him some of his pay (and salary cap space if possible) and try to retain him on less money on a good behaviour condition or something. IMO when assaulting a random person because you are inebriated you should end up in prison, but the courts are soft as, and they will give him a good behaviour bond and that'll be that.

Getting rid of our plodders is fine and well, but all we got is plodders.

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

Another long year… Dunno why I bother

I reckon. Everyone complains that they're human and they have lives etc, but you honestly believe that if the CEO of Qantas bashed a cabbie he'd not get the punt for it?

Keeping your nose clean is a small price to pay for the cheque you bring home.

If the CEO of Qantas bashed a cabbie it would be with his handbag.

Yes I know he is gay, that is irrelevant. If he got into a stink with a cabbie he would get punted though.

 

[Muffstar]

Punt him and the other moron we just signed.

 

[GNR4LIFE]

I wonder what's the point?

**What's the bet that he ends up going to the Dogs or Eels before the season starts? We punt him, and he won't be without a club for more than a week.**

So now I'm thinking we may as well fine him, dock him some of his pay (and salary cap space if possible) and try to retain him on less money on a good behaviour condition or something. IMO when assaulting a random person because you are inebriated you should end up in prison, but the courts are soft as, and they will give him a good behaviour bond and that'll be that.

Getting rid of our plodders is fine and well, but all we got is plodders.

Who cares. He’s an average player. They can have him.

 

[JD Tiger]

I wonder what's the point?

**What's the bet that he ends up going to the Dogs or Eels before the season starts? We punt him, and he won't be without a club for more than a week.**

So now I'm thinking we may as well fine him, dock him some of his pay (and salary cap space if possible) and try to retain him on less money on a good behaviour condition or something. IMO when assaulting a random person because you are inebriated you should end up in prison, but the courts are soft as, and they will give him a good behaviour bond and that'll be that.

Getting rid of our plodders is fine and well, but all we got is plodders.

Who cares. He’s an average player. They can have him.

Yeah I hear you, and you are right, he's a good average player, but no better then that. Just annoys me that when we kick them out, another club snaps them up immediately. There's no consequences, these guys think they can do anything and get away with it, and yes they usually do.

 

[Dallas]

Goodbye

 

[colmcd]

I wonder what's the point?

**What's the bet that he ends up going to the Dogs or Eels before the season starts? We punt him, and he won't be without a club for more than a week.**

So now I'm thinking we may as well fine him, dock him some of his pay (and salary cap space if possible) and try to retain him on less money on a good behaviour condition or something. IMO when assaulting a random person because you are inebriated you should end up in prison, but the courts are soft as, and they will give him a good behaviour bond and that'll be that.

Getting rid of our plodders is fine and well, but all we got is plodders.

Who cares. He’s an average player. They can have him.

Yeah I hear you, and you are right, he's a good average player, but no better then that. Just annoys me that when we kick them out, another club snaps them up immediately. There's no consequences, these guys think they can do anything and get away with it, and yes they usually do.

Bingo.

I actually think it should happen in reverse. If a player demonstrates bad behaviour then the Club should have full rights to the players contract and no other club should be able to sign him unless the first club agrees.
The clubs do need to do their part, but no one can stop an idiot being an idiot.

Either way Chee-Kam won't be getting a call from Uncle Nick. He is too average to be wanted and if he is back in the NRL it will be for 80K

 

[GNR4LIFE]

I wonder what's the point?

**What's the bet that he ends up going to the Dogs or Eels before the season starts? We punt him, and he won't be without a club for more than a week.**

So now I'm thinking we may as well fine him, dock him some of his pay (and salary cap space if possible) and try to retain him on less money on a good behaviour condition or something. IMO when assaulting a random person because you are inebriated you should end up in prison, but the courts are soft as, and they will give him a good behaviour bond and that'll be that.

Getting rid of our plodders is fine and well, but all we got is plodders.

Who cares. He’s an average player. They can have him.

Yeah I hear you, and you are right, he's a good average player, but no better then that. Just annoys me that when we kick them out, another club snaps them up immediately. There's no consequences, these guys think they can do anything and get away with it, and yes they usually do.

Bingo.

I actually think it should happen in reverse. If a player demonstrates bad behaviour then the Club should have full rights to the players contract and no other club should be able to sign him unless the first club agrees.
**The clubs do need to do their part, but no one can stop an idiot being an idiot.**

Either way Chee-Kam won't be getting a call from Uncle Nick. He is too average to be wanted and if he is back in the NRL it will be for 80K

They aren’t babysitters. They can’t stop players from going out. And if one of them chooses to punch out an Uber driver, that is on the player.

 

[Madge]

I don’t think we should be bringing religion into this because it has nothing to do with it.

 

[TheDaBoss]

So much for new year new team

 

[Tcat]

The poor guy. People don't understand the pressure these young kids are under. 😡.🤡.