No money for Moss

[matchball]

It's probably Anasta laying the boot in again.
Nothing to see here.

 

[GNR4LIFE]

I think we should ignore this story. I recall Tiger Torch's wise words, (our man on the inside and provider of the most interesting and insightful information on the 2016 team) - he said in his post of 18 December on the thread "Your top 17, Season 2016":

"That's about all I have at present, I may check in prior to kick off, don't forget to question any negative rumour/s regarding the club and analyse the source / motivation.

"The club is neither a basket case of (or) a best practice organization but it is heading in the right direction."

I intend to take TT's advice and ignore this garbage.

But by responding you haven't ignored it.

 

[fibrodreaming]

I think we should ignore this story. I recall Tiger Torch's wise words, (our man on the inside and provider of the most interesting and insightful information on the 2016 team) - he said in his post of 18 December on the thread "Your top 17, Season 2016":

"That's about all I have at present, I may check in prior to kick off, don't forget to question any negative rumour/s regarding the club and analyse the source / motivation.

"The club is neither a basket case of (or) a best practice organization but it is heading in the right direction."

I intend to take TT's advice and ignore this garbage.

But by responding you haven't ignored it.

Perhaps a poor choice of words on my part. I am not taking the report seriously.

 

[Geo]

Is Buzz back from the bar.?

Your link Ink is for subscribers…as if the want me to subscribe...bwahaha :laughing:

 

[southerntiger]

Why would the players give a stuff about a guy in the office getting the flick? I hardly think it's something that would cause an uproar among the playing group.

I've said it soooo many times…do NOT read the telegraph

The DT are not the only newspaper who make up sports stories just to sell more papers. Ask Chris Gayle who is suing the Fairfax Group.

Fairfax has gone significantly downhill in the past 10 years but they didn't make up that story. They reported a version of events told to them by a source. Irrespective, the fact that Gayle is suing doesn't mean it is not true. Fairfax has indicated that they stand by the story.

As for the DT, I take the view that generally the opposite of what they print is true.

 

[innsaneink]

Is Buzz back from the bar.?

Your link Ink is for subscribers…as if the want me to subscribe...bwahaha :laughing:

Yeah I dunno …..I was able to access the story on my phone after a 'Phil Moss' google news search....under this title.
Farah ditches All Stars for Super Bowl

I dont subscribe

 

[Nelson]

Yeah if you want to access "subscriber only" Daily Telegraph articles then Google the title of the article and open it from the search result link. You can also clear your browser history once you've reached your "weekly limit" of articles to reset it (which also works for the SMH).

 

[Eddie]

They do like a "crisis" the Tele

However we give them plenty to work with.

Now this could be major or minor (Moss) however with our history of paying out people what did you expect from the Tele.

Bottom line, we just got to get our house in order.

 

[Tigermama]

I liken the usual made up garbage from News publications, including the culturally and factually bankrupt Telegraph, to cockroach droppings. Unpleasant-to be immediately consigned to the trash can

:laughing:

 

[GNR4LIFE]

And people want to give Taylor only 10 rounds. We're clearly capable of paying someone out aren't we.

 

[Nelson]

And people want to give Taylor only 10 rounds. We're clearly capable of paying someone out aren't we.

There may be a performance clause that allows for termination without the need for a payout, or with a reduced figure at least. Hopefully we start the season well and it will all be irrelevant…

 

[jirskyr]

Just putting some perspective here.

You terminate someone and you owe them the payout of their contract. Is it really that weird to pay them out in installments, rather than a lump sum? We are talking about WT here, not Google.

Or put another way, can you afford full payout on your car loan today, or are you working it down over time?

 

[gallagher]

Just putting some perspective here.

You terminate someone and you owe them the payout of their contract. Is it really that weird to pay them out in installments, rather than a lump sum? We are talking about WT here, not Google.

Or put another way, can you afford full payout on your car loan today, or are you working it down over time?

If you make the choice to get rid of the car then the bank will demand their money right away, not in installments.

 

[supercoach]

The way I see it if you terminate a person who is under contract,that person is entitled to what ever money is owing the minute he is terminated. In saying that if both parties agree for the monies to be paid over time than there is no problems.
I really doubt there is much truth in this piece off fluff