No ticker

[Joel Helmes]

Calm down guys.

 

[Fade_To_Black]

Talk about thick, and missing the point
We are cyber bullies.
Happy?

Talk about missing the point :laughing:
What's the problem? Truth hurt?
Now you resort to calling me thick , on top of other having to 'learn' me :unamused:
I'm neither thick or need to be taught anything.
If you think smart alec juvenile remarks will bully me into silence then you have picked on the wrong person - I don't get bullied by anyone in the real world , **let alone by keyboard blowhards**.

:righton:

 

[GNR4LIFE]

Harden up Ck. You'd think this guy was an immediate family member

 

[dermo]

http://www.makingthenut.com/content/couch-round-26-0

Congratulations Tim Moltzen, Ben Roberts and Chris Sandow: On a weekend of high drama for the Willie M Medal, the Wests Tigers' Tim Moltzen polled two votes in the loss to Melbourne while Ben Roberts received two votes and Chris Sandow one in the final game of the year to lead to a three-way tie for the 2012 Willie M Medal.

It is Sandow's second Willie M Medal, after the Eels halfback won the inaugural award with South Sydney in 2010.

On an unprecedented weekend, the Parramatta halves duo and Wests Tigers fullback all recorded votes on the final weekend to win rugby league's most dubious honour.

Moltzen and Sandow both posted votes in 10 games, each winning four worst on ground efforts, while Roberts posted in nine games and also had four worst on ground performances.

**Moltzen played all 24 game for the Tigers and committed 17 errors and missed 44 tackles, struggling under the high ball all season while offering very little support at the back.**

Roberts was actually dropped throughout the season but managed 19 games, making the award all the more remarkable. In his first season at the Eels, he combined 24 handling errors and an average of over two missed tackles a game with a horrible kicking game, poor options and astonishingly bad defensive reads. His game against the Tigers was one of the worst ever.

Sandow, a perennial vote-getter, returned to his best in 23 games for his new club. Signed on a big-money deal, he contributed 24 errors and 5.5 missed tackles with a general disinterest in playing rugby league.

Congratulations goes out to all three as well as Tim Sheens, Stephen Kearney and Brad Arthur. Their names are now etched in history, forever linked with mediocrity, below par rugby league, stupidity, gutlessness and a general lack of ability.

Willie M Rollcall of Honour
2010: Chris Sandow (Sou)
2011: Blake Ferguson (Can)
2012: Tim Moltzen (Tig), Ben Roberts (Par), Chris Sandow (Par)

He only played 20 games this year actually, shows how much this bell end knows

 

[dermo]

No mention of the try saving tackle he made on Widdop in the first few mins

Things a footballer are supposed to do often get overlooked when they regulalrly shirk their responsibilitys.
Players make try saving tackles every week, right down to the u/8's….its a fundamental part of the game.
What next?
Applauding him for tying his bootlaces correctly?

If theres going to be a 4 page thread on his one error all game, then you would think one of you would mention the **good things** he did but no, its the same every week, does alot of good things then one bad and the whole forum blows up. He made no **errors** (1 actually when you take into account the non attempt at the bomb) and had 1 missed tackle but the way you lot carry on you'd think he was the sole reason we lost

You just dont get how weak dogging it is, going the self preservation route instead of giving it your all for the team.

Brett Hodgson….a scrawny runt but the heart and guts of a lion.

Its not just ''**errors''**.....all players make errors

And all players do '**'good things**", things they are supposed to do on a field, but we dont talk about them, we talk about exceptional, brilliant things, because good things are a fundamental part of the game, its evident, its not necessary to discuss it

It's rather hypocritical to call someone you don't no personally weak and soft from behind the comfort of you computer screen isn't it. And once again I think if you are going to so vehemently abuse him, it is necessary to talk of his positives.

 

[innsaneink]

Im describing his football ability…the incident we are talking about reeked of having ''No ticker''
Nothing to stop you creating your own thread on his positives

Vehemently abuse?....please, get a grip.

 

[innsaneink]

Talk about thick, and missing the point
We are cyber bullies.
Happy?

Talk about missing the point :laughing:
What's the problem? Truth hurt?
Now you resort to calling me thick , on top of other having to 'learn' me :unamused:
I'm neither thick or need to be taught anything.
If you think smart alec juvenile remarks will bully me into silence then you have picked on the wrong person - I don't get bullied by anyone in the real world , let alone by keyboard blowhards.

I just agreed with you…...still not happy?
Let it go.
And you need to learn the difference between discussion, which is whats happening here....and bullying

Such a soft generation today, the PC brigade and the leftys have a lot to answer for

 

[GNR4LIFE]

Dermo, he's only going off what Moltzen has showed on the field. You saying he hasn't earnt that tag after some of the things he's showed us this yr and last yr?

And Ck you always go on about you only defend Moltzen cos your sick of the crap he receives, not cos you worship him (which is really believable btw :laughing: ), so going on what you claim just for a second, why don't you ever defend Sheens and Blair against the same thing? they receive the same amount of crap as Moltzen and it gets just as bad (particularly in Sheens case) but you never say a word. Yet you'll defend Moltzen against every last negative word against him. Your agenda is just as obvious as the people you like to accuse

 

[dermo]

Dermo, he's only going off what Moltzen has showed on the field. You saying he hasn't earnt that tag after some of the things he's showed us this yr and last yr?

And Ck you always go on about you only defend Moltzen cos your sick of the crap he receives, not cos you worship him (which is really believable btw :laughing: ), so going on what you claim just for a second, why don't you ever defend Sheens and Blair against the same thing? they receive the same amount of crap as Moltzen and it gets just as bad (particularly in Sheens case) but you never say a word. Yet you'll defend Moltzen against every last negative word against him. Your agenda is just as obvious as the people you like to accuse

Not to the extent that is made out on here, he doesn't go 100% at a highball but then when we played Parra he makes a 1 v 1 tackle on a runaway Moi Moi who tried to run right over the top of him, to me that takes courage but you wouldn't hear a word of it from some here.

And for what its worth IMO Sheens is more to blame for our short comings this year than Moltzen

 

[innsaneink]

Im pretty sure that tackle was mentioned by several, I know i did, it impressed me and I can still see it in my mind…....it was a great tackle

 

[dermo]

Im pretty sure that tackle was mentioned by several, I know i did, it impressed me and I can still see it in my mind…....it was a great tackle

So if one incident of "dogging it" as you put it makes him weak, wouldn't one incident of courage make him courageous?

 

[tig_prmz]

Dermo, he's only going off what Moltzen has showed on the field. You saying he hasn't earnt that tag after some of the things he's showed us this yr and last yr?

And Ck you always go on about you only defend Moltzen cos your sick of the crap he receives, not cos you worship him (which is really believable btw :laughing: ), so going on what you claim just for a second, why don't you ever defend Sheens and Blair against the same thing? they receive the same amount of crap as Moltzen and it gets just as bad (particularly in Sheens case) but you never say a word. Yet you'll defend Moltzen against every last negative word against him. Your agenda is just as obvious as the people you like to accuse

Not to the extent that is made out on here, he doesn't go 100% at a highball but then when we played Parra he makes a 1 v 1 tackle on a runaway Moi Moi **who tried to run right over the top of him,** to me that takes courage but you wouldn't hear a word of it from some here.

And for what its worth IMO Sheens is more to blame for our short comings this year than Moltzen

yeh right… :unamused:

lol u dont know the meaning of discussion... ink/gnr think he is pea hearted and so far all your excuses have been pathetic.. world runs on evidences.

 

[cktiger]

Talk about thick, and missing the point
We are cyber bullies.
Happy?

Talk about missing the point :laughing:
What's the problem? Truth hurt?
Now you resort to calling me thick , on top of other having to 'learn' me :unamused:
I'm neither thick or need to be taught anything.
If you think smart alec juvenile remarks will bully me into silence then you have picked on the wrong person - I don't get bullied by anyone in the real world , let alone by keyboard blowhards.

I just agreed with you…...still not happy?
Let it go.
And you need to learn the difference between discussion, which is whats happening here....and bullying

**Such a soft generation today, the PC brigade and the leftys have a lot to answer for**

:laughing: You'll need to to better than that poor attempt , ink.
And telling me I need to learn something …again. :crazy
I am acutely aware of the difference between discussion and what's happening here.
Trying to lord it over everone with your veiled insults at people's comprehension of things does not wash with me.
You're lame attempt at feeling superior by listing your location as 'ahead of you' says it all.
By the way , I come from a generation that took no crap from anyone and grew up in one of the toughest areas around.
I'm neither soft , a lefty or politically correct and have never been influenced by them (as you allude).
Once again you have gotten things wrong.
Stick to picking on the kids and leave the men alone.

 

[innsaneink]

So why do you think Im bullying you?
Harden up for christs sake

Nice to see im under your skin…if my location irks you so...then LOL@ u

 

[cktiger]

So why do you think Im bullying you?
Harden up for christs sake

Nice to see im under your skin…if my location irks you so...then LOL@ u

Another attempt?
I need to harden up ? :roll
You are not bullying me, ink … and don't think you ever could.
Under my skin?
Don't give yourself so much credit.
If anything I feel sorry for you.

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

Enough already.

 

[innsaneink]

So why do you think Im bullying you?
Harden up for christs sake

Nice to see im under your skin…if my location irks you so...then LOL@ u

Another attempt?
I need to harden up ? :roll
**You are not bullying me, ink … and don't think you ever could.**
Under my skin?
Don't give yourself so much credit.
If anything I feel sorry for you.

So why did you address this to me?

If you think smart alec juvenile remarks will bully me into silence then you have picked on the wrong person - I don't get bullied by anyone in the real world

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

Give the posturing a rest and discuss the topic. Any further comments will be deleted.

 

[cktiger]

No probs with me CB.

 

[innsaneink]

Tim just needs to get the eye of the tiger.
I remember once when Lawrence was first starting, a commentator mentioned he could see in his eyes once he crossed that sideline…110% total focus.....nothing else matters. Only team - for the next 90 mins or watever.
Tim needs that.